Zhang A, Su M Y, Zheng L J, Chen L, Liu G C, Song L L, Wang Y J
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Guangdong Maternal and Child Health Hospital, Guangzhou 511400, China.
Department of Maternal and Child Health, School of Public Health, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430030, China.
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi. 2024 Mar 25;59(3):184-191. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn112141-20231107-00178.
To investigate the impact of abnormal patterns of 75 g oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) in the second trimester on the risk of large for gestational age (LGA) newborn deliveries. General clinical data and OGTT results of 66 290 pregnant women who received regular prenatal care and delivered in Guangdong Maternal and Child Health Hospital from December 24, 2016 to July 26, 2022 were collected. According to the results of OGTT, the pregnant women were divided into 8 groups: normal blood glucose group (normal fasting blood glucose, 1-hour and 2-hour after oral glucose, 54 518 cases), gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) 0 group (only abnormal fasting blood glucose, 1 430 cases), GDM 1 group (only abnormal blood glucose at 1-hour after oral glucose, 2 150 cases), GDM 2 group (only abnormal blood glucose at 2-hour after oral glucose, 3 736 cases), GDM 0+1 group (both fasting blood glucose and 1-hour after oral glucose were abnormal, 371 cases), GDM 0+2 group (both fasting blood glucose and 2-hour after oral glucose were abnormal, 280 cases), GDM 1+2 group (abnormal blood glucose at 1-hour and 2-hour after oral glucose, 2 981 cases) and GDM 0+1+2 group (abnormal fasting blood glucose, 1-hour and 2-hour after oral glucose, 824 cases). Multivariate logistic regression was used to analyze the effects of different abnormal OGTT patterns on LGA. In addition, the blood glucose measurements at the three time points of OGTT were combined and used as continuous variables in the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve to evaluate the predictive value of each blood glucose measurement mode for LGA and the area under the curve (AUC) was compared. (1) Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that the risks of LGA were significantly increased in GDM 0 group (=1.76, 95%: 1.50-2.08; <0.001), GDM 0+1 group (=2.29, 95%: 1.72-3.04; <0.001), and GDM 0+1+2 group (=1.98, 95%: 1.61-2.43; <0.001). (2) ROC curve analysis showed that fasting blood glucose, 1-hour after oral glucose, 2-hour after oral glucose, fasting+1-hour after oral glucose, fasting+2-hour after oral glucose, 1-hour+2-hour after oral glucose, and fasting+1-hour+2-hour after oral glucose had certain predictive value for LGA (all <0.001). The AUC of fasting blood glucose measurement was higher than that of 2-hour blood glucose measurement in predicting LGA, and the difference was statistically significant (<0.05). There was no significant difference in the AUC between fasting blood glucose and other blood glucose measurement modes for predicting LGA (all >0.05). In the abnormal OGTT patterns, pregnant women with abnormal fasting blood glucose, abnormal fasting+1-hour after oral glucose, and abnormal fasting+1-hour+2-hour after oral glucose have an increased risk of LGA. Fasting blood glucose measurement is of great significance for the prediction of LGA, and could be used as an optimal indicator to evaluate the risk of LGA in clinical practice.
探讨孕中期75克口服葡萄糖耐量试验(OGTT)异常模式对大于胎龄(LGA)新生儿分娩风险的影响。收集了2016年12月24日至2022年7月26日在广东省妇幼保健院接受常规产前检查并分娩的66290例孕妇的一般临床资料和OGTT结果。根据OGTT结果,将孕妇分为8组:血糖正常组(空腹血糖、口服葡萄糖后1小时及2小时血糖均正常,54518例)、妊娠期糖尿病(GDM)0组(仅空腹血糖异常,1430例)、GDM 1组(仅口服葡萄糖后1小时血糖异常,2150例)、GDM 2组(仅口服葡萄糖后2小时血糖异常,3736例)、GDM 0 + 1组(空腹血糖和口服葡萄糖后1小时血糖均异常,371例)、GDM 0 + 2组(空腹血糖和口服葡萄糖后2小时血糖均异常,280例)、GDM 1 + 2组(口服葡萄糖后1小时及2小时血糖异常,2981例)和GDM 0 + 1 + 2组(空腹血糖、口服葡萄糖后1小时及2小时血糖均异常,824例)。采用多因素logistic回归分析不同OGTT异常模式对LGA的影响。此外,将OGTT三个时间点的血糖测量值合并作为连续变量绘制受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线,评估各血糖测量模式对LGA的预测价值并比较曲线下面积(AUC)。(1)多因素logistic回归分析显示,GDM 0组(=1.76,95%:1.50 - 2.08;<0.001)、GDM 0 + 1组(=2.29,95%:1.72 - 3.04;<0.001)和GDM 0 + 1 + 2组(=1.98,95%:1.61 - 2.43;<0.001)的LGA风险显著增加。(2)ROC曲线分析显示,空腹血糖、口服葡萄糖后1小时血糖、口服葡萄糖后2小时血糖、空腹 + 口服葡萄糖后1小时血糖、空腹 + 口服葡萄糖后2小时血糖、口服葡萄糖后1小时 + 2小时血糖以及空腹 + 口服葡萄糖后1小时 + 2小时血糖对LGA均有一定预测价值(均<0.001)。空腹血糖测量预测LGA的AUC高于口服葡萄糖后2小时血糖测量,差异有统计学意义(<0.05)。空腹血糖与其他血糖测量模式预测LGA的AUC差异无统计学意义(均>0.05)。在OGTT异常模式中,空腹血糖异常、空腹 + 口服葡萄糖后1小时血糖异常以及空腹 + 口服葡萄糖后1小时 + 2小时血糖异常的孕妇LGA风险增加。空腹血糖测量对LGA预测具有重要意义,可作为临床评估LGA风险的最佳指标。