Zhang Yongqing, Chen Luping, Ouyang Yinluan, Wang Xiaoyan, Fu Tiantian, Yan Guohui, Liang Zhaoxia, Chen Danqing
Department of Obstetrics, Women's Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China (Zhang, Chen, Ouyang, Fu, Yan, Liang, Chen).
Department of Obstetrics, Taizhou First People's Hospital, Taizhou, China (Wang).
AJOG Glob Rep. 2024 Aug 15;4(4):100390. doi: 10.1016/j.xagr.2024.100390. eCollection 2024 Nov.
Gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) can lead to various adverse pregnancy outcomes for both mothers and infants, including gestational hypertension, premature rupture of membranes, preterm birth, macrosomia, large for gestational age (LGA) infants, and neonatal hypoglycemia. Previous studies have mainly focused on the overall risk of GDM for adverse maternal and neonatal outcomes, but there has been limited research specifically investigating the relationship between different patterns of abnormal oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) results and adverse maternal and neonatal outcomes.
The study aimed to analyze the maternal and neonatal outcomes among GDM women with different OGTT patterns and to explore a new classification method capable of stratifying GDM into high-risk (GDM-HR) and low-risk subtypes based on OGTT results.
We conducted a retrospective cohort study at the Women's Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, spanning from November 1, 2015, to April 30, 2018. During the study period, a total of 3268 cases of GDM were enrolled. Based on the results of the OGTT, these GDM cases were classified into 7 subtypes, and the composition ratio of each subtype and their maternal and neonatal outcomes were analyzed. Innovatively, we proposed to categorize GDM-HR (characterized by elevated fasting blood glucose [FBG] levels, including T0, T0+1, T0+2, and T0+1+2) and low-risk GDM (GDM-LR, without elevated FBG, including T1, T2, and T1+2) and compared the maternal and neonatal outcomes between the two subtypes.
(1) In this cohort of 3268 GDM cases, the composition ratios of the 7 GDM subtypes were as follows: T0 (7.9%, =260), T1 (24.2%, =791), T2 (27.4%, =897), T0+1 (5.4%, =175), T0+2 (1.7%, =56), T1+2 (26.2%, =855), and T0+1+2 (7.2%, =234). (2) GDM subtypes with elevated FBG levels (GDM-HR) exhibit more severe adverse prognostic outcomes compared to those without elevated FBG levels (GDM-LR). (3) Multiple logistic regression analysis revealed that compared to the GDM-LR group, the GDM-HR group showed increased fetal birth weight (by approximately 150 grams), and had higher rates of cesarean section (adjusted odds ratio [aOR]: 1.45, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.19-1.76), hypertensive disorders of pregnancy (aOR: 1.78, 95% CI: 1.35-2.35), preterm birth (aOR: 1.59, 95% CI: 1.17-2.16), macrosomia (aOR: 2.66, 95% CI: 2.07-3.43), LGA infants (aOR: 2.46, 95% CI: 2.05-2.97), and neonatal hypoglycemia (aOR: 2.00, 95% CI: 1.37-2.91). Partial correlation analysis shows a positive correlation between fetal birth weight and FBG levels, with =0.222, <.001. Multiple linear regression indicates that for every 1 mmol/L increase in FBG, the fetal weight is estimated to increase by approximately 188 grams.
The composition ratio of GDM subtypes with elevated FBG (GDM-HR) is relatively low within GDM cases, yet it presents with a higher risk of adverse outcomes compared to subtypes without elevated FBG (GDM-LR), warranting increased attention from obstetricians. Applying this new classification method in clinical practice enables better differentiation and individualized management of GDM.
妊娠期糖尿病(GDM)可导致母婴出现各种不良妊娠结局,包括妊娠期高血压、胎膜早破、早产、巨大儿、大于胎龄儿(LGA)以及新生儿低血糖。以往研究主要关注GDM对母婴不良结局的总体风险,但专门研究口服葡萄糖耐量试验(OGTT)结果的不同异常模式与母婴不良结局之间关系的研究有限。
本研究旨在分析不同OGTT模式的GDM女性的母婴结局,并探索一种能够根据OGTT结果将GDM分为高危(GDM-HR)和低危亚型的新分类方法。
我们在浙江大学医学院附属妇产科医院进行了一项回顾性队列研究,研究时间跨度为2015年11月1日至2018年4月30日。研究期间,共纳入3268例GDM病例。根据OGTT结果,将这些GDM病例分为7个亚型,并分析各亚型的构成比及其母婴结局。创新性地,我们提议将GDM-HR(以空腹血糖[FBG]水平升高为特征,包括T0、T0+1、T0+2和T0+1+2)和低危GDM(GDM-LR,无FBG升高,包括T!、T2和T1+2)进行分类,并比较两种亚型的母婴结局。
(1)在这3268例GDM病例队列中,7种GDM亚型的构成比分别为:T0(7.9%,=260)、T1(24.2%,=791)、T2(27.4%,=897)、T0+1(5.4%,=175)、T0+2(1.7%,=56)、T1+2(26.2%,=855)和T0+1+2(7.2%,=234)。(2)与无FBG水平升高的GDM亚型(GDM-LR)相比,FBG水平升高的GDM亚型(GDM-HR)表现出更严重的不良预后结局。(3)多因素logistic回归分析显示,与GDM-LR组相比,GDM-HR组胎儿出生体重增加(约150克),剖宫产率更高(调整优势比[aOR]:1.45,95%置信区间[CI]:1.19-1.76)、妊娠期高血压疾病(aOR:1.78,95%CI:1.35-2.35)、早产(aOR:1.59,95%CI:1.17-2.16)、巨大儿(aOR:2.66,95%CI:2.07-3.43)、LGA婴儿(aOR:2.46,95%CI:2.05-2.97)和新生儿低血糖(aOR:2.00,95%CI:1.37-2.91)。偏相关分析显示胎儿出生体重与FBG水平呈正相关,r=0.222,P<0.001。多因素线性回归表明,FBG每升高1 mmol/L,胎儿体重估计增加约188克。
FBG升高的GDM亚型(GDM-HR)在GDM病例中的构成比相对较低,但与无FBG升高的亚型(GDM-LR)相比,其不良结局风险更高,值得产科医生更多关注。在临床实践中应用这种新的分类方法能够更好地对GDM进行区分和个体化管理。