• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
How does empowering men affect intimate partner violence? Evidence from Bangladesh.增强男性权能如何影响亲密伴侣暴力行为?来自孟加拉国的证据。
SSM Popul Health. 2024 Mar 16;26:101656. doi: 10.1016/j.ssmph.2024.101656. eCollection 2024 Jun.
2
Men's perspectives on women's empowerment and intimate partner violence in rural Bangladesh.孟加拉国农村男性对女性赋权及亲密伴侣暴力的看法。
Cult Health Sex. 2018 Jan;20(1):113-127. doi: 10.1080/13691058.2017.1332391. Epub 2017 Jun 8.
3
Economic empowerment and intimate partner violence: a secondary data analysis of the cross-sectional Demographic Health Surveys in Sub-Saharan Africa.经济赋权与亲密伴侣暴力:对撒哈拉以南非洲地区横断面人口健康调查的二次数据分析。
BMC Womens Health. 2021 Jun 12;21(1):241. doi: 10.1186/s12905-021-01363-9.
4
Associations of attitudes and social norms with experiences of intimate partner violence among married adolescents and their husbands in rural Niger: a dyadic cross-sectional study.态度和社会规范与尼日尔农村已婚青少年及其丈夫中亲密伴侣暴力经历的关联:一项对偶横断面研究。
BMC Womens Health. 2022 May 18;22(1):180. doi: 10.1186/s12905-022-01724-y.
5
WOMEN'S EMPOWERMENT AND INTIMATE PARTNER VIOLENCE IN BANGLADESH: INVESTIGATING THE COMPLEX RELATIONSHIP.孟加拉国的妇女赋权与亲密伴侣暴力:探究复杂关系。
J Biosoc Sci. 2019 Mar;51(2):188-202. doi: 10.1017/S0021932018000068. Epub 2018 Mar 6.
6
Women's and men's reports of past-year prevalence of intimate partner violence and rape and women's risk factors for intimate partner violence: A multicountry cross-sectional study in Asia and the Pacific.关于过去一年亲密伴侣暴力和强奸的女性及男性报告以及女性亲密伴侣暴力的风险因素:一项在亚洲及太平洋地区开展的多国横断面研究。
PLoS Med. 2017 Sep 5;14(9):e1002381. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1002381. eCollection 2017 Sep.
7
Effectiveness of a culturally appropriate intervention to prevent intimate partner violence and HIV transmission among men, women, and couples in rural Ethiopia: Findings from a cluster-randomized controlled trial.文化适宜型干预在埃塞俄比亚农村地区预防男性、女性和夫妻间亲密伴侣暴力和艾滋病毒传播的效果:一项基于群组随机对照试验的研究结果。
PLoS Med. 2020 Aug 18;17(8):e1003274. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1003274. eCollection 2020 Aug.
8
Household decision-making and its association with intimate partner violence: Examining differences in men's and women's perceptions in Uganda.家庭决策及其与亲密伴侣暴力的关联:探究乌干达男性与女性认知的差异
SSM Popul Health. 2019 Jun 28;8:100442. doi: 10.1016/j.ssmph.2019.100442. eCollection 2019 Aug.
9
Men's response to their wives' participation in microfinance: perpetration and justification of intimate partner violence in Bangladesh.男性对其妻子参与小额信贷的反应:孟加拉国亲密伴侣暴力行为的实施与辩解
Public Health. 2016 Dec;141:146-152. doi: 10.1016/j.puhe.2016.09.016. Epub 2016 Oct 15.
10
Intimate partner violence functions as both a risk marker and risk factor for women's HIV infection: findings from Indian husband-wife dyads.亲密伴侣暴力既是女性感染艾滋病毒的风险标志,也是风险因素:来自印度夫妻二元组的研究结果。
J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2009 Aug 15;51(5):593-600. doi: 10.1097/QAI.0b013e3181a255d6.

本文引用的文献

1
Women's Employment and Intimate Partner Violence: Understanding the Role of Individual and Community Structural Drivers in Low- and Middle-Income Countries.妇女就业与亲密伴侣暴力:理解个体和社区结构因素在中低收入国家的作用。
J Interpers Violence. 2023 May;38(9-10):6480-6499. doi: 10.1177/08862605221134086. Epub 2022 Nov 13.
2
Education and Intimate Partner Violence Among Married Women in Nigeria: A Multilevel Analysis of Individual and Community-Level Factors.尼日利亚已婚妇女的教育与亲密伴侣暴力:个体和社区层面因素的多层次分析。
J Interpers Violence. 2023 Feb;38(3-4):3831-3863. doi: 10.1177/08862605221109896. Epub 2022 Oct 13.
3
Intimate partner violence and associated factors among reproductive age women in Liberia: a cross-sectional study using a recent Liberian demographic and health survey.利比里亚育龄妇女的亲密伴侣暴力及其相关因素:一项利用最近的利比里亚人口与健康调查的横断面研究。
BMC Womens Health. 2022 Jun 17;22(1):238. doi: 10.1186/s12905-022-01830-x.
4
Determinants of Emotional Intimate Partner Violence against Women and Girls with Children in Mexican Households: An Ecological Framework.墨西哥家庭中对有子女的妇女和女童实施情感亲密伴侣暴力的决定因素:生态框架。
J Interpers Violence. 2022 Dec;37(23-24):NP22704-NP22731. doi: 10.1177/08862605211072179. Epub 2022 Feb 8.
5
Do women with autonomy in the household experience less intimate partner violence in Malawi? Evidence from the 2015-16 Demographic and Health Survey.在马拉维,家庭自主权较高的女性是否较少经历亲密伴侣暴力?来自 2015-16 年人口与健康调查的证据。
J Biosoc Sci. 2022 Nov;54(6):939-958. doi: 10.1017/S0021932021000559. Epub 2021 Oct 27.
6
The power of the collective empowers women: Evidence from self-help groups in India.集体的力量赋予女性力量:来自印度自助团体的证据。
World Dev. 2021 Oct;146:105579. doi: 10.1016/j.worlddev.2021.105579.
7
Economic empowerment and intimate partner violence: a secondary data analysis of the cross-sectional Demographic Health Surveys in Sub-Saharan Africa.经济赋权与亲密伴侣暴力:对撒哈拉以南非洲地区横断面人口健康调查的二次数据分析。
BMC Womens Health. 2021 Jun 12;21(1):241. doi: 10.1186/s12905-021-01363-9.
8
Understanding female and male empowerment in Burkina Faso using the project-level Women's Empowerment in Agriculture Index (pro-WEAI): a longitudinal study.利用项目层面的农业妇女赋权指数(pro-WEAI)了解布基纳法索的女性和男性赋权:一项纵向研究。
BMC Womens Health. 2021 Jun 3;21(1):230. doi: 10.1186/s12905-021-01371-9.
9
Women's participation in microfinance: Effects on Women's agency, exposure to partner violence, and mental health.女性参与小额信贷:对妇女代理、遭受伴侣暴力和心理健康的影响。
Soc Sci Med. 2021 Feb;270:113686. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2021.113686. Epub 2021 Jan 5.
10
The Role of Income on the Relationship Between the Brazilian Cash Transfer Program () and Intimate Partner Violence: Evidence From a Multigroup Path Analysis.收入对巴西现金转移计划()与亲密伴侣暴力关系的影响:多群组路径分析的证据。
J Interpers Violence. 2022 Apr;37(7-8):NP4006-NP4029. doi: 10.1177/0886260520951313. Epub 2020 Sep 10.

增强男性权能如何影响亲密伴侣暴力行为?来自孟加拉国的证据。

How does empowering men affect intimate partner violence? Evidence from Bangladesh.

作者信息

Francis-Tan Andrew

机构信息

National University of Singapore, Singapore.

出版信息

SSM Popul Health. 2024 Mar 16;26:101656. doi: 10.1016/j.ssmph.2024.101656. eCollection 2024 Jun.

DOI:10.1016/j.ssmph.2024.101656
PMID:38544696
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10965466/
Abstract

This paper investigates the relationship between women's and men's empowerment and intimate partner violence (IPV). To do so, it uses a sample of 4548 households with a husband and a wife who are present in two or three rounds of the Bangladesh Integrated Household Survey (BIHS). Measures of empowerment are constructed separately and symmetrically for husbands and wives. Conditional fixed-effects logistic regressions are employed to examine the statistical association between measures of empowerment and intimate partner violence. Findings indicate that IPV is widespread in rural Bangladesh, as 67.6% and 22.4% of households report experiencing verbal and physical IPV, respectively, in at least one round. Husbands tend to be more empowered than their wives in most, but not all, dimensions. Yet, even in dimensions of empowerment dominated by men on average, the percentage of households in which individual wives are more empowered than their husbands is notable. In regressions, some measures of men's empowerment (e.g., ownership of assets) are negatively associated with verbal and any IPV. Some measures of women's empowerment (e.g., community influence) are associated with verbal, physical, and any IPV, but the signs are mixed. All in all, the findings suggest that men's empowerment may be a determinant of intimate partner violence in rural Bangladesh, and they also underscore the need to extend theories of empowerment.

摘要

本文探讨了妇女赋权和男子赋权与亲密伴侣暴力(IPV)之间的关系。为此,研究采用了孟加拉国综合家庭调查(BIHS)两轮或三轮调查中包含夫妻的4548个家庭作为样本。分别为丈夫和妻子构建了对称的赋权指标。采用条件固定效应逻辑回归来检验赋权指标与亲密伴侣暴力之间的统计关联。研究结果表明,亲密伴侣暴力在孟加拉国农村地区普遍存在,至少有一轮调查中,分别有67.6%和22.4%的家庭报告经历过言语和身体上的亲密伴侣暴力。在大多数但并非所有维度上,丈夫往往比妻子更有权力。然而,即使在平均而言由男性主导的赋权维度中,个别妻子比丈夫更有权力的家庭比例也相当可观。在回归分析中,一些男性赋权指标(如资产所有权)与言语暴力和任何形式的亲密伴侣暴力呈负相关。一些女性赋权指标(如社区影响力)与言语暴力、身体暴力和任何形式的亲密伴侣暴力相关,但符号不一。总的来说,研究结果表明,男子赋权可能是孟加拉国农村地区亲密伴侣暴力的一个决定因素,同时也强调了扩展赋权理论的必要性。