Kaufmann Mareile, Vestad Maja
Department of Criminology and Sociology of Law, University of Oslo, Kristian Augusts Gate 17, 0164 Oslo, Norway.
Crit Criminol. 2023;31(4):1217-1232. doi: 10.1007/s10612-023-09732-6. Epub 2023 Oct 9.
The use of biometrics for the creation of visual 'body types' needs continued criminological engagement. This article discusses Lombroso's practice of typing 'born criminals' vis-à-vis genomic phenotyping used to identify potential suspects. Both are prevalent examples of scientizing police and legal work. While Lombroso draws on anatomy to explain causes of criminal behavior, phenotyping is based on genomic and physiognomic correlation to help identify suspects. Despite these differences, both forms of visualizing bodies, we argue, are also a practice of . Especially in the context of crime and crime control, marking is a sensitive and political practice. Since typing is embedded in criminology, our analysis is also a critical engagement with criminology itself.
将生物识别技术用于创建视觉“身体类型”需要犯罪学持续参与。本文讨论了隆布罗索对“天生罪犯”进行分类的做法,以及用于识别潜在嫌疑人的基因组表型分析。这两者都是将警察和法律工作科学化的普遍例子。虽然隆布罗索利用解剖学来解释犯罪行为的原因,但表型分析是基于基因组和面相学的相关性来帮助识别嫌疑人。我们认为,尽管存在这些差异,但这两种可视化身体的形式也是一种标记行为。特别是在犯罪和犯罪控制的背景下,标记是一种敏感且具有政治性的行为。由于分类法植根于犯罪学,我们的分析也是对犯罪学本身的批判性参与。