Rajme-López Sandra, Martinez-Guerra Bernardo A, Román-Montes Carla M, Tamez-Torres Karla M, Tello-Mercado Andrea C, Tepo-Ponce Karen M, Segura-Ortíz Zurisadai, López-Aguirre Abigail, Gutiérrez-Mazariegos Orianlid Del Rocío, Lazcano-Delgadillo Oswaldo, Nares-López Rafael, González-Lara María F, Kershenobich-Stalnikowitz David, Sifuentes-Osornio José, Ponce-de-León Alfredo, Ruíz-Palacios Guillermo M
Infectious Diseases Department, Instituto Nacional de Ciencias Médicas y Nutrición 'Salvador Zubirán', Mexico City, Mexico.
Instituto Nacional de Ciencias Médicas y Nutrición 'Salvador Zubirán', Mexico City, Mexico.
Ther Adv Infect Dis. 2024 Mar 26;11:20499361241236582. doi: 10.1177/20499361241236582. eCollection 2024 Jan-Dec.
Even though worldwide death rates from coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) have decreased, the threat of disease progression and death for high-risk groups continues. Few direct comparisons between the available severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) antivirals have been made.
We aimed to compare two SARS-CoV-2 antivirals (nirmatrelvir/ritonavir and remdesivir) against all-cause hospitalization or death.
This is a propensity score-matched cohort study.
We included all high-risk outpatients with COVID-19 in a tertiary referral center in Mexico City from 1 January 2022 to 31 July 2023. The primary outcome was all-cause hospitalization or death 28 days after symptom onset. The secondary outcome was COVID-19-associated hospitalization or death 28 days after symptom onset. Logistic regression analysis for characteristics associated with the primary outcome and a multi-group comparison with Kaplan-Meier survival estimates were performed.
Of 1566 patients analyzed, 783 did not receive antiviral treatment, 451 received remdesivir, and 332 received nirmatrelvir/ritonavir. The median age was 60 years (interquartile range: 46-72), 62.5% were female and 97.8% had at least one comorbidity. The use of nirmatrelvir/ritonavir was associated with an absolute risk reduction of 8.8% and a relative risk reduction of 90% for all-cause hospitalization or death. The use of remdesivir was associated with an absolute risk reduction of 6.4% and a relative risk reduction of 66% for all-cause hospitalization or death. In multivariable analysis, both antivirals reduced the odds of 28-day all-cause hospitalization or death [nirmatrelvir/ritonavir odds ratio (OR) 0.08 - 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.03-0.19, remdesivir OR 0.29 - 95% CI: 0.18-0.45].
In high-risk COVID-19 outpatients, early antiviral treatment with nirmatrelvir/ritonavir or remdesivir was associated with lower 28-day all-cause hospitalization or death.
尽管2019冠状病毒病(COVID-19)的全球死亡率有所下降,但高危人群疾病进展和死亡的威胁依然存在。目前针对严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒2(SARS-CoV-2)的抗病毒药物之间很少有直接比较。
我们旨在比较两种SARS-CoV-2抗病毒药物(奈玛特韦/利托那韦和瑞德西韦)对全因住院或死亡的影响。
这是一项倾向评分匹配队列研究。
我们纳入了2022年1月1日至2023年7月31日在墨西哥城一家三级转诊中心的所有高危COVID-19门诊患者。主要结局是症状出现后28天的全因住院或死亡。次要结局是症状出现后28天的COVID-19相关住院或死亡。对与主要结局相关的特征进行逻辑回归分析,并采用Kaplan-Meier生存估计进行多组比较。
在分析的1566例患者中,783例未接受抗病毒治疗,451例接受瑞德西韦治疗,332例接受奈玛特韦/利托那韦治疗。中位年龄为60岁(四分位间距:46-72岁),62.5%为女性,97.8%至少有一种合并症。使用奈玛特韦/利托那韦使全因住院或死亡的绝对风险降低8.8%,相对风险降低90%。使用瑞德西韦使全因住院或死亡的绝对风险降低6.4%,相对风险降低66%。在多变量分析中,两种抗病毒药物均降低了28天全因住院或死亡的几率[奈玛特韦/利托那韦比值比(OR)0.08 - 95%置信区间(CI):0.03-0.19,瑞德西韦OR 0.29 - 95% CI:0.18-0.45]。
在高危COVID-19门诊患者中,早期使用奈玛特韦/利托那韦或瑞德西韦进行抗病毒治疗与28天全因住院或死亡风险较低相关。