Penlington Chris, Pornsukjantra Pattramon, Chazot Paul, Cole Frances, Denneny Diarmuid
Department of Dental Sciences, Faculty of Medical Sciences Newcastle University, Newcastle, UK.
Psychology in Healthcare, Newcastle Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Newcastle Upon Tyne, UK.
Br J Pain. 2024 Apr;18(2):148-154. doi: 10.1177/20494637231212748. Epub 2023 Nov 4.
Supported self-management is an important component of management for persistent pain according to current recommendations and guidelines. However, it is unclear whether staff from differing disciplines who may be in early contact with people with established or developing persistent pain are confident to introduce and support self-management for this patient group.
To determine the confidence of staff across professional disciplines to introduce and support self-management.
Cross-sectional online survey.
Charts were constructed to represent information on professional grouping, prior training in self-management and confidence in supporting key components of self-management for persistent pain. Analysis of variance was used to test for differences between groups.
Overall, 165 practitioners reported confidence to support self-management below the midpoint of a ten-point scale and 93 above. There were few differences between different professions apart from in explaining pain (f = 6.879 < .001), managing activity levels (f = 6.340 < .001) and supporting healthy habits (f = 4.700, = .001) in which physiotherapists expressed higher confidence than other professional groups. There was no difference in confidence expressed between staff who had or had not received previous training in self-management (f = 1.357, = .233).
Many front-line staff who might be expected to introduce and deliver self-management support for persistent pain lack the confidence and skills to do so. This is consistent with a known lack of education about pain across disciplinary boundaries in primary and community-based care. In order to meet treatment priorities for persistent pain there is an urgent need to upskill the workforce by providing access to good quality training and resources.
根据当前的建议和指南,支持性自我管理是持续性疼痛管理的重要组成部分。然而,尚不清楚那些可能与已确诊或正在发展为持续性疼痛的患者早期接触的不同学科的工作人员是否有信心为该患者群体引入并支持自我管理。
确定不同专业学科的工作人员引入并支持自我管理的信心。
横断面在线调查。
构建图表以呈现关于专业分组、自我管理方面的既往培训以及对持续性疼痛自我管理关键组成部分的支持信心等信息。使用方差分析来检验组间差异。
总体而言,165名从业者表示在10分制量表的中点以下有信心支持自我管理,93名从业者表示在中点以上有信心。除了解释疼痛(F = 6.879,P <.001)、管理活动水平(F = 6.340,P <.001)和支持健康习惯(F = 4.700,P =.001)方面存在差异外,不同专业之间差异不大,在这些方面,物理治疗师比其他专业群体表现出更高的信心。接受过或未接受过自我管理方面既往培训的工作人员在信心表达上没有差异(F = 1.357,P =.233)。
许多预期会为持续性疼痛引入并提供自我管理支持的一线工作人员缺乏这样做的信心和技能。这与基层和社区护理中跨学科疼痛教育的已知缺乏情况一致。为了满足持续性疼痛的治疗重点,迫切需要通过提供高质量的培训和资源来提升工作人员的技能。