Thiero Oumar, Tounkara Moctar, Konare Fousseini, Keita Soumba, Diarra Seydou
Department of Teaching and Research in Public Health and Specialities, Faculty of Medicine and Odonto Stomatology.
University Clinical Research Center (UCRC). University of Sciences, Techniques and Technologies of Bamako (USTTB). Mali.
Tunis Med. 2024 Mar 5;102(3):134-138. doi: 10.62438/tunismed.v102i3.4661.
To describe the scientific editorial quality of practice theses defended at the Faculties of Medicine and Pharmacy of Bamako (Mali), during the period 2016-2018.
This was a cross-sectional study conducted on practice theses in health science, defended between 2016 and 2018, and the electronic version of which was available at the libraries of the Faculties of Medicine and Pharmacy in Bamako. An adjusted STROBE grid was used to measure a scientific editorial conformity score for 18 iso-weighted items of the IMRaD structure (i.e. a total of 18 points). In this way, the scientific editorial quality of practice theses in health sciences was judged to be highly conform (14-18 points), fairly conform (9-13 points), poorly conform (5-8 points), or not conform (<5 points). An ordinal logistic regression model was used to identify determining factors independently associated with the scientific editorial quality of the health sciences practice thesis, with a significance level of 5%.
A total of 534 practice theses in health sciences were included in this study, whose scientific editorial quality was judged to be highly or fairly conform (12.2%), poorly conform (43.1%) or not conform (44.8%). These standards scientific editorial conformity, which was higher in a "Medicine" thesis than in a "Pharmacy" thesis (ORa=2.45; IC95% [1.62-3.27], p<=0.05), was attributed to the supervisor's membership of a research structure (ORa=2.88; IC95% [1.6-3.2]; p<0.05).
The research methodology profile of the practice health sciences thesis supervisor and the thesis section are associated with scientific editorial standard with the IMRaD.
描述2016 - 2018年期间在巴马科（马里）的医学院和药学院所答辩的实习论文的科学编辑质量。
这是一项横断面研究，对象为2016年至2018年间答辩的健康科学实习论文，其电子版可在巴马科医学院和药学院图书馆获取。使用经过调整的STROBE网格来衡量IMRaD结构中18个同等权重项目的科学编辑符合度得分（即总分18分）。通过这种方式，将健康科学实习论文的科学编辑质量判定为高度符合（14 - 18分）、中等符合（9 - 13分）、符合度差（5 - 8分）或不符合（<5分）。使用有序逻辑回归模型来确定与健康科学实习论文的科学编辑质量独立相关的决定因素，显著性水平为5%。
本研究共纳入534篇健康科学实习论文，其科学编辑质量被判定为高度或中等符合（12.2%）、符合度差（43.1%）或不符合（44.8%）。这些标准的科学编辑符合度在“医学”论文中高于“药学”论文（优势比=2.45；95%置信区间[1.62 - 3.27]，p<=0.05），这归因于导师所属的研究机构（优势比=2.88；95%置信区间[1.6 - 3.2]；p<0.05）。
健康科学实习论文导师的研究方法概况和论文所属学科与IMRaD的科学编辑标准相关。
