Kabthymer Robel Hussen, Saadati Saeede, Lee Mark, Hariharan Rohit, Feehan Jack, Mousa Aya, de Courten Barbora
Department of Medicine, School of Clinical Sciences, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia.
School of Health and Biomedical Sciences, RMIT University, Melbourne, Australia.
Nutr Rev. 2025 Feb 1;83(2):e54-e64. doi: 10.1093/nutrit/nuae021.
Mental ill-health is a common and growing issue, affecting 1 in 8 individuals or 970 million people worldwide in 2019. Histidine-containing dipeptides (HCDs) have been suggested to mitigate some aspects of mental ill-health, but a quantitative synthesis of the evidence is lacking. Therefore, a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials was conducted.
To summarize the evidence on the effects of HCDs on mental health outcomes.
A systematic literature search was performed using electronic databases (Medline via Ovid, Embase via Ovid, Scopus, Google Scholar, and Cochrane) from inception to October, 2022.
Two authors independently extracted data using a structured extraction format.
Data analysis was performed using STATA version 17. Random-effects models were used, and heterogeneity was assessed using the I2 test. Quality appraisal was performed using the Cochrane risk-of-bias 2.0 tool and the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) approach.
5507 studies were identified, with 20 studies fulfilling the inclusion criteria. Eighteen studies comprising 776 participants were included in the meta-analysis. HCD supplementation (anserine/carnosine, l-carnosine, β-alanine) caused a significant reduction in depression scores measured with the Becks Depression Inventory (-0.79; 95% CI: -1.24, -0.35; moderate certainty on GRADE) when compared with placebo. An increase in quality-of-life scores measured with the 36-item Short-Form survey (SF-36) (0.65; 95% CI: 0.00, 1.30) and low certainty on GRADE in HCDs (anserine/carnosine, l-carnosine, β-alanine) when compared with placebo were found. However, the rest of the outcomes did not show a significant change between HCD supplementation and placebo. Although the number of studies included in the meta-analysis was modest, a significant mean reduction was observed in depression score as well as an increase in quality-of-life score for the HCD group when compared with placebo. Most of the studies included had small sample sizes with short follow-up periods and moderate to high risk of bias, highlighting the need for further, well-designed studies to improve the evidence base.
PROSPERO registration no. CRD42017075354.
心理健康问题是一个普遍且日益严重的问题,2019年全球每8个人中就有1人受其影响,即9.7亿人。含组氨酸的二肽(HCDs)已被认为可缓解心理健康问题的某些方面,但缺乏对证据的定量综合分析。因此,我们进行了一项随机对照试验的系统评价和荟萃分析。
总结HCDs对心理健康结果影响的证据。
使用电子数据库(通过Ovid的Medline、通过Ovid的Embase、Scopus、谷歌学术和Cochrane)进行了一项系统的文献检索,检索时间从数据库建立至2022年10月。
两名作者使用结构化提取格式独立提取数据。
使用STATA 17版进行数据分析。采用随机效应模型,并使用I²检验评估异质性。使用Cochrane偏倚风险2.0工具和推荐分级、评估、制定与评价(GRADE)方法进行质量评估。
共识别出5507项研究,其中20项研究符合纳入标准。荟萃分析纳入了18项研究,共776名参与者。与安慰剂相比,补充HCDs(鹅肌肽/肌肽、L-肌肽、β-丙氨酸)导致使用贝克抑郁量表测量的抑郁评分显著降低(-0.79;95%置信区间:-1.24,-0.35;GRADE中等确定性)。与安慰剂相比,使用36项简短调查问卷(SF-36)测量的生活质量评分有所提高(0.65;95%置信区间:0.00,1.30),且HCDs(鹅肌肽/肌肽、L-肌肽、β-丙氨酸)的GRADE确定性较低。然而,其余结果在补充HCDs与安慰剂之间未显示出显著变化。尽管荟萃分析中纳入的研究数量不多,但与安慰剂相比,HCD组的抑郁评分显著降低,生活质量评分有所提高。纳入的大多数研究样本量小、随访期短且偏倚风险为中度至高度,这突出表明需要进一步开展设计良好的研究以完善证据基础。
PROSPERO注册号CRD42017075354。