Suppr超能文献

减少美国乳房重建中的差异:2005 年至 2017 年使用三个全国性数据集进行的分析。

Disparity Reduction in U.S. Breast Reconstruction: An Analysis from 2005 to 2017 Using 3 Nationwide Data Sets.

机构信息

From the Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Service.

Department of Epidemiology and Statistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center.

出版信息

Plast Reconstr Surg. 2024 Dec 1;154(6):1065e-1075e. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000011432. Epub 2024 Mar 26.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Following passage of the Women's Health and Cancer Rights Act of 1998 (WHCRA), a steady rise in breast reconstruction rates was reported; however, a recent update is lacking. This study aimed to evaluate longitudinal trends in breast reconstruction (BR) rates in the United States and relevant sociodemographic factors.

METHODS

Mastectomy cases with and without BR from 2005 through 2017 were abstracted from the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database; the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Program database; and the National Cancer Database (NCDB). BR rates were examined using Poisson regression. Multivariable logistic regression analysis of NCDB data were used to identify predictors of reconstruction. Race and insurance distributions were evaluated over time.

RESULTS

Of 1,554,381 mastectomy patients, 507,631 (32.7%) underwent BR. Annual reconstruction rates per 1000 mastectomies increased from 2005 to 2012 (National Surgical Quality Improvement Program incidence rate ratio [IRR], 1.077; Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Program IRR, 1.090; and NCDB IRR, 1.092) and stabilized from 2013 to 2017. NCDB data showed that patients who were younger (≤59 years), privately insured, had fewer comorbidities, and underwent contralateral prophylactic mastectomy were more likely to undergo BR (all P < 0.001). Over time, the increase in BR rates was higher among Black (252.3%) and Asian (366.4%) patients than among White patients (137.3%). BR rates increased more among Medicaid (418.6%) and Medicare (302.8%) patients than among privately insured patients (125.3%).

CONCLUSIONS

This analysis demonstrates stabilization in immediate BR rates over the past decade; reasons behind this stabilization are likely multifactorial. Disparities based on race and insurance type have decreased, with a more equitable distribution of BR rates.

CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Risk, III.

摘要

背景

1998 年《妇女健康与癌症权益法案》(WHCRA)通过后,据报道乳房重建率稳步上升;然而,最近缺乏更新。本研究旨在评估美国乳房重建(BR)率的纵向趋势及相关社会人口因素。

方法

从国家外科质量改进计划数据库、监测、流行病学和最终结果数据库以及国家癌症数据库(NCDB)中提取 2005 年至 2017 年接受乳房切除术且行或不行乳房重建的病例;采用泊松回归分析 BR 率。对 NCDB 数据进行多变量逻辑回归分析,以确定重建的预测因素。评估种族和保险分布随时间的变化。

结果

在 1554381 例乳房切除术患者中,507631 例(32.7%)接受了 BR。每 1000 例乳房切除术的年度重建率从 2005 年至 2012 年增加(国家外科质量改进计划发生率比 [IRR],1.077;监测、流行病学和最终结果计划 IRR,1.090;NCDB IRR,1.092),并从 2013 年至 2017 年稳定下来。NCDB 数据显示,年龄较小(≤59 岁)、私人保险、合并症较少且接受对侧预防性乳房切除术的患者更有可能接受 BR(均 P < 0.001)。随着时间的推移,黑人(252.3%)和亚洲人(366.4%)患者的 BR 率增长高于白人患者(137.3%)。医疗补助(418.6%)和医疗保险(302.8%)患者的 BR 率增长高于私人保险患者(125.3%)。

结论

本分析表明,过去十年中 BR 即时率稳定;这种稳定的原因可能是多方面的。基于种族和保险类型的差异已经减少,BR 率的分布更加公平。

临床问题/证据水平:风险,III。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

1
The Approach to Multidisciplinary Oncologic Breast Care.多学科乳腺癌护理方法
Semin Plast Surg. 2025 Mar 31;39(2):97-102. doi: 10.1055/s-0045-1806808. eCollection 2025 May.
2

本文引用的文献

3
Not Just a Linear Closure: Aesthetic Flat Closure after Mastectomy.不仅仅是线性缝合:乳房切除术后的美学平整缝合
Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2022 May 18;10(5):e4327. doi: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000004327. eCollection 2022 May.
7
Current Trends in Postmastectomy Breast Reconstruction.乳房切除术后乳房重建的当前趋势
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2017 Nov;140(5S Advances in Breast Reconstruction):7S-13S. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000003941.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验