• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

从医疗保健专业人员角度看摩洛哥皮肤利什曼病诊断工具的微观成本核算及可接受性:一项混合方法研究。

Micro-costing from healthcare professional's perspective and acceptability of cutaneous leishmaniasis diagnostic tools in Morocco: A mixed-methods study.

作者信息

Bennis Issam, Sadiki Mohamed, Ezzahidi Abdelkacem, Laaroussi Naoual, Bouhout Souad

机构信息

International School of Public Health, Mohammed VI University of Health and Sciences (UM6SS), Casablanca, Morocco.

Delegation of Ministry of Health, Tinghir Province, Morocco.

出版信息

PLOS Glob Public Health. 2024 Mar 28;4(3):e0002534. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0002534. eCollection 2024.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pgph.0002534
PMID:38547152
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10977798/
Abstract

In Morocco, cutaneous leishmaniasis (CL) represents a concern with three causative parasite species. Despite this, rapid diagnostic test (RDT) for CL is not part of the national control strategy. This study evaluates the acceptability and micro-costing of the CL Detect Rapid Test by Inbios International. The study was conducted from June 2019 to January 2020 and included 46 healthcare professionals from 40 primary healthcare centers and district labs. Data was collected by self-administered questionnaires and interviews and analysed using NVivo, Jamovi, and Python to generate a predictive model and sensitivity analysis by calculating the average Cost-Benefit Ratio for compared CL diagnostic scenarios. The exchange rate is 1 USD = 9.6 MAD (Moroccan Dirham) in November 2019. The CL-RDT received notable acceptance for its user-friendliness and time efficiency compared to traditional microscopy. Micro-costing data revealed that the average unit cost for microscopy is 15 MAD [7-31], whereas 75 MAD [52-131] for CL-RDT. Altogether, the diagnostic cost for microscopy is 115 MAD±4, marginally higher than the 102 MAD±2 for CL-RDT (p = 0,05). Sensitivity analysis identified the most cost-benefit scenarios based on a Cost-Benefit Ratio (CBR). The optimal approach involves using CL-RDT once at a primary healthcare centre (PHC) (CBR = 1.4), especially if the unitary cost is below 79 MAD. The second-best option is using CL-RDT once at a laboratory (CBR = 1.0), which is advantageous if priced under 54 MAD. However, using CL-RDT twice for the same lesion had a less favourable CBR of 0.6 and was only beneficial if priced below 09 MAD. The reference scenario was a single CL-RDT at the PHC followed by microscopy at a laboratory. In conclusion, the forthcoming CL-RDT, expected to feature enhanced sensitivity, is advocated for deployment in resource-limited endemic areas.

摘要

在摩洛哥,皮肤利什曼病(CL)是一个令人担忧的问题,有三种致病寄生虫物种。尽管如此,CL的快速诊断测试(RDT)并非国家控制战略的一部分。本研究评估了Inbios International公司的CL Detect快速检测的可接受性和微观成本。该研究于2019年6月至2020年1月进行,纳入了来自40个初级医疗保健中心和地区实验室的46名医疗保健专业人员。数据通过自行填写的问卷和访谈收集,并使用NVivo、Jamovi和Python进行分析,以生成预测模型并通过计算比较CL诊断方案的平均成本效益比进行敏感性分析。2019年11月的汇率为1美元 = 9.6摩洛哥迪拉姆(MAD)。与传统显微镜检查相比,CL-RDT因其用户友好性和时间效率而获得了显著认可。微观成本数据显示,显微镜检查的平均单位成本为15摩洛哥迪拉姆[7 - 31],而CL-RDT为75摩洛哥迪拉姆[52 - 131]。总体而言,显微镜检查的诊断成本为115摩洛哥迪拉姆±4,略高于CL-RDT的102摩洛哥迪拉姆±2(p = 0.05)。敏感性分析基于成本效益比(CBR)确定了最具成本效益的方案。最佳方法是在初级医疗保健中心(PHC)使用一次CL-RDT(CBR = 1.4),特别是如果单位成本低于79摩洛哥迪拉姆。次优选择是在实验室使用一次CL-RDT(CBR = 1.0),如果价格低于54摩洛哥迪拉姆则具有优势。然而,对同一病变使用两次CL-RDT的CBR不太理想,为0.6,只有在价格低于9摩洛哥迪拉姆时才有益。参考方案是在PHC进行一次CL-RDT,然后在实验室进行显微镜检查。总之,预计即将推出的具有更高灵敏度的CL-RDT,主张在资源有限的流行地区部署。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a7f4/10977798/427d5004809c/pgph.0002534.g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a7f4/10977798/360b2a830095/pgph.0002534.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a7f4/10977798/275e29ba39b3/pgph.0002534.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a7f4/10977798/ddb833f904e3/pgph.0002534.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a7f4/10977798/427d5004809c/pgph.0002534.g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a7f4/10977798/360b2a830095/pgph.0002534.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a7f4/10977798/275e29ba39b3/pgph.0002534.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a7f4/10977798/ddb833f904e3/pgph.0002534.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a7f4/10977798/427d5004809c/pgph.0002534.g004.jpg

相似文献

1
Micro-costing from healthcare professional's perspective and acceptability of cutaneous leishmaniasis diagnostic tools in Morocco: A mixed-methods study.从医疗保健专业人员角度看摩洛哥皮肤利什曼病诊断工具的微观成本核算及可接受性:一项混合方法研究。
PLOS Glob Public Health. 2024 Mar 28;4(3):e0002534. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0002534. eCollection 2024.
2
Accuracy of a Rapid Diagnostic Test Based on Antigen Detection for the Diagnosis of Cutaneous Leishmaniasis in Patients with Suggestive Skin Lesions in Morocco.基于抗原检测的快速诊断试验在摩洛哥疑似皮损患者中诊断皮肤利什曼病的准确性。
Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2018 Sep;99(3):716-722. doi: 10.4269/ajtmh.18-0066. Epub 2018 Jul 5.
3
Cost Effectiveness of New Diagnostic Tools for Cutaneous Leishmaniasis in Afghanistan.阿富汗皮肤利什曼病新诊断工具的成本效益。
Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2019 Apr;17(2):213-230. doi: 10.1007/s40258-018-0449-8.
4
Efficacy of a new rapid diagnostic test kit to diagnose Sri Lankan cutaneous leishmaniasis caused by Leishmania donovani.一种新型快速诊断试剂盒用于诊断由杜氏利什曼原虫引起的斯里兰卡皮肤利什曼病的疗效。
PLoS One. 2017 Nov 14;12(11):e0187024. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0187024. eCollection 2017.
5
Cost-effectiveness analysis of malaria rapid diagnostic test in the elimination setting.消除疟疾背景下疟疾快速诊断检测的成本效益分析。
Infect Dis Poverty. 2020 Sep 29;9(1):135. doi: 10.1186/s40249-020-00745-9.
6
Cost-effectiveness of incorporating Ebola prediction score tools and rapid diagnostic tests into a screening algorithm: A decision analytic model.将埃博拉预测评分工具和快速诊断测试纳入筛查算法的成本效益:决策分析模型。
PLoS One. 2023 Oct 17;18(10):e0293077. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0293077. eCollection 2023.
7
Cost-effectiveness of diagnostic for malaria in Extra-Amazon Region, Brazil.巴西亚马孙河以外地区疟疾诊断的成本效益分析。
Malar J. 2012 Nov 23;11:390. doi: 10.1186/1475-2875-11-390.
8
Estimation of the cost of treatment by chemotherapy for early breast cancer in Morocco.摩洛哥早期乳腺癌化疗治疗成本的估算。
Cost Eff Resour Alloc. 2010 Sep 10;8:16. doi: 10.1186/1478-7547-8-16.
9
Cost-effectiveness analysis of rapid diagnostic test, microscopy and syndromic approach in the diagnosis of malaria in Nigeria: implications for scaling-up deployment of ACT.尼日利亚疟疾快速诊断检测、显微镜检查和症状处理方法的成本效益分析:对 ACT 广泛应用部署的影响。
Malar J. 2009 Nov 23;8:265. doi: 10.1186/1475-2875-8-265.
10
Testing for SARS-CoV-2 in resource-limited settings: A cost analysis study of diagnostic tests using different Ag-RDTs and RT-PCR technologies in Mozambique.资源有限环境下的新型冠状病毒2019检测:莫桑比克使用不同抗原快速检测试剂和逆转录聚合酶链反应技术进行诊断检测的成本分析研究
PLOS Glob Public Health. 2023 Jun 13;3(6):e0001999. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0001999. eCollection 2023.

本文引用的文献

1
The psychosocial burden of cutaneous leishmaniasis in rural Sri Lanka: A multi-method qualitative study.斯里兰卡农村地区皮肤利什曼病的社会心理负担:一项多方法定性研究。
PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2024 Jan 18;18(1):e0011909. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0011909. eCollection 2024 Jan.
2
Diagnostic performance of CL Detect rapid-immunochromatographic test for cutaneous leishmaniasis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.CL Detect 快速免疫层析试验诊断皮肤利什曼病的诊断性能:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Syst Rev. 2023 Dec 20;12(1):240. doi: 10.1186/s13643-023-02422-y.
3
Delayed diagnosis among patients with cutaneous and mucocutaneous leishmaniasis.
皮肤和黏膜皮肤利什曼病患者的诊断延迟。
Travel Med Infect Dis. 2023 Sep-Oct;55:102637. doi: 10.1016/j.tmaid.2023.102637. Epub 2023 Aug 25.
4
Molecular Diagnosis of Leishmaniasis in Spain: Development and Validation of Ready-To-Use Gel-Form Nested and Real-Time PCRs To Detect spp.西班牙利什曼原虫病的分子诊断:用于检测 spp. 的即用型凝胶形式巢式和实时 PCR 的开发和验证
Microbiol Spectr. 2023 Jun 15;11(3):e0335422. doi: 10.1128/spectrum.03354-22. Epub 2023 Apr 4.
5
Evaluation of a diagnostic device, CL Detect rapid test for the diagnosis of new world cutaneous leishmaniasis in Peru.评价一种诊断设备,即 CL Detect 快速检测试剂,用于在秘鲁诊断新热带皮肤利什曼病。
PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2023 Mar 13;17(3):e0011054. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0011054. eCollection 2023 Mar.
6
Diagnosis of Human Cutaneous Leishmaniasis: A Comparative Study Using CL Detect Dipstick, Direct Smear and Polymerase Chain Reaction Methods.人皮肤利什曼病的诊断:CL 检测棒、直接涂片和聚合酶链反应方法的比较研究。
Acta Parasitol. 2023 Jun;68(2):328-333. doi: 10.1007/s11686-023-00662-5. Epub 2023 Mar 13.
7
Laboratory diagnostics for human Leishmania infections: a polymerase chain reaction-focussed review of detection and identification methods.实验室诊断人利什曼原虫感染:聚合酶链反应为重点的检测和鉴定方法综述。
Parasit Vectors. 2022 Nov 5;15(1):412. doi: 10.1186/s13071-022-05524-z.
8
Cutaneous Leishmaniasis: A 2022 Updated Narrative Review into Diagnosis and Management Developments.皮肤利什曼病:2022 年更新的诊断和治疗进展叙述性综述。
Am J Clin Dermatol. 2022 Nov;23(6):823-840. doi: 10.1007/s40257-022-00726-8. Epub 2022 Sep 14.
9
A novel rapid LAMP test for identification of cutaneous leishmaniasis: An evaluation and comparative analysis of three molecular methods.一种用于鉴定皮肤利什曼病的新型快速 LAMP 检测方法:三种分子方法的评估和比较分析。
Microb Pathog. 2022 Aug;169:105612. doi: 10.1016/j.micpath.2022.105612. Epub 2022 May 31.
10
Evaluation of the CL Detect Rapid Test in Ethiopian patients suspected for Cutaneous Leishmaniasis.评估 CL Detect Rapid 检测试剂盒在埃塞俄比亚疑似皮肤利什曼病患者中的应用。
PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2022 Jan 18;16(1):e0010143. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0010143. eCollection 2022 Jan.