Suppr超能文献

从医疗保健专业人员角度看摩洛哥皮肤利什曼病诊断工具的微观成本核算及可接受性:一项混合方法研究。

Micro-costing from healthcare professional's perspective and acceptability of cutaneous leishmaniasis diagnostic tools in Morocco: A mixed-methods study.

作者信息

Bennis Issam, Sadiki Mohamed, Ezzahidi Abdelkacem, Laaroussi Naoual, Bouhout Souad

机构信息

International School of Public Health, Mohammed VI University of Health and Sciences (UM6SS), Casablanca, Morocco.

Delegation of Ministry of Health, Tinghir Province, Morocco.

出版信息

PLOS Glob Public Health. 2024 Mar 28;4(3):e0002534. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0002534. eCollection 2024.

Abstract

In Morocco, cutaneous leishmaniasis (CL) represents a concern with three causative parasite species. Despite this, rapid diagnostic test (RDT) for CL is not part of the national control strategy. This study evaluates the acceptability and micro-costing of the CL Detect Rapid Test by Inbios International. The study was conducted from June 2019 to January 2020 and included 46 healthcare professionals from 40 primary healthcare centers and district labs. Data was collected by self-administered questionnaires and interviews and analysed using NVivo, Jamovi, and Python to generate a predictive model and sensitivity analysis by calculating the average Cost-Benefit Ratio for compared CL diagnostic scenarios. The exchange rate is 1 USD = 9.6 MAD (Moroccan Dirham) in November 2019. The CL-RDT received notable acceptance for its user-friendliness and time efficiency compared to traditional microscopy. Micro-costing data revealed that the average unit cost for microscopy is 15 MAD [7-31], whereas 75 MAD [52-131] for CL-RDT. Altogether, the diagnostic cost for microscopy is 115 MAD±4, marginally higher than the 102 MAD±2 for CL-RDT (p = 0,05). Sensitivity analysis identified the most cost-benefit scenarios based on a Cost-Benefit Ratio (CBR). The optimal approach involves using CL-RDT once at a primary healthcare centre (PHC) (CBR = 1.4), especially if the unitary cost is below 79 MAD. The second-best option is using CL-RDT once at a laboratory (CBR = 1.0), which is advantageous if priced under 54 MAD. However, using CL-RDT twice for the same lesion had a less favourable CBR of 0.6 and was only beneficial if priced below 09 MAD. The reference scenario was a single CL-RDT at the PHC followed by microscopy at a laboratory. In conclusion, the forthcoming CL-RDT, expected to feature enhanced sensitivity, is advocated for deployment in resource-limited endemic areas.

摘要

在摩洛哥,皮肤利什曼病(CL)是一个令人担忧的问题,有三种致病寄生虫物种。尽管如此,CL的快速诊断测试(RDT)并非国家控制战略的一部分。本研究评估了Inbios International公司的CL Detect快速检测的可接受性和微观成本。该研究于2019年6月至2020年1月进行,纳入了来自40个初级医疗保健中心和地区实验室的46名医疗保健专业人员。数据通过自行填写的问卷和访谈收集,并使用NVivo、Jamovi和Python进行分析,以生成预测模型并通过计算比较CL诊断方案的平均成本效益比进行敏感性分析。2019年11月的汇率为1美元 = 9.6摩洛哥迪拉姆(MAD)。与传统显微镜检查相比,CL-RDT因其用户友好性和时间效率而获得了显著认可。微观成本数据显示,显微镜检查的平均单位成本为15摩洛哥迪拉姆[7 - 31],而CL-RDT为75摩洛哥迪拉姆[52 - 131]。总体而言,显微镜检查的诊断成本为115摩洛哥迪拉姆±4,略高于CL-RDT的102摩洛哥迪拉姆±2(p = 0.05)。敏感性分析基于成本效益比(CBR)确定了最具成本效益的方案。最佳方法是在初级医疗保健中心(PHC)使用一次CL-RDT(CBR = 1.4),特别是如果单位成本低于79摩洛哥迪拉姆。次优选择是在实验室使用一次CL-RDT(CBR = 1.0),如果价格低于54摩洛哥迪拉姆则具有优势。然而,对同一病变使用两次CL-RDT的CBR不太理想,为0.6,只有在价格低于9摩洛哥迪拉姆时才有益。参考方案是在PHC进行一次CL-RDT,然后在实验室进行显微镜检查。总之,预计即将推出的具有更高灵敏度的CL-RDT,主张在资源有限的流行地区部署。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a7f4/10977798/360b2a830095/pgph.0002534.g001.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验