Department of Biomedical Sciences, Faculty of Pharmaceutical, Biomedical and Veterinary Sciences, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium.
Department of Public Health, Institute of Tropical Medicine, Antwerp, Belgium.
Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2018 Sep;99(3):716-722. doi: 10.4269/ajtmh.18-0066. Epub 2018 Jul 5.
In rural areas in Morocco, diagnosing cutaneous leishmaniasis (CL) can be challenging. We evaluated the accuracy of a rapid diagnostic test (RDT) based on antigen detection, CL Detect Rapid Test (Inbios International Inc., Seattle, WA), in this setting. We consecutively recruited patients with new skin ulcers in nine primary health centers. We took a dental broach sample for the RDT and two other tissue samples by scraping the border and center of the lesion with a scalpel and smearing it on a slide. We duplicated each smear by pressing a clean slide against it and processed the slides by microscopy, polymerase chain reaction (PCR) internal transcribed spacer 1, and kDNA minicircle PCR. In a subgroup with positive PCR, the species was identified using PCR-restriction fragment length polymorphism and PCR-sequencing of genes. A participant with positive microscopy and/or PCR was considered a confirmed CL case. We computed sensitivity (Se) and specificity (Sp) of the RDT compared with this reference standard (ClinicalTrials.gov registration: NCT02979002). Between December 2016 and July 2017, we included 219 patients, 50% of them were under 18 years old. Rapid diagnostic test Se was 68% [95% confidence interval (CI): 61-74], Sp 94% [95% CI: 91-97], positive predictive value 95% [95% CI: 92-98], and negative predictive value 64% [95% CI: 58-70]. Despite its low Se, this novel RDT is a useful addition to clinical management of CL in Morocco, especially in isolated localities. Rapid diagnostic test-positive lesions can be treated as CL; but when RDT negative, microscopy should be done in a second step. The Se of the RDT can probably be optimized by improving the sampling procedure.
在摩洛哥农村地区,诊断皮肤利什曼病(CL)可能具有挑战性。我们在这种情况下评估了基于抗原检测的快速诊断检测(RDT)的准确性,CL 检测快速检测(Inbios International Inc.,西雅图,WA)。我们连续招募了九个初级保健中心新出现皮肤溃疡的患者。我们用牙锉样本进行 RDT,并使用手术刀刮取病变的边界和中心,将其涂抹在载玻片上,以获得另外两个组织样本。我们用干净的载玻片压在每个涂片上,通过显微镜检查、聚合酶链反应(PCR)内部转录间隔区 1 和 kDNA 微环 PCR 处理载玻片。在具有阳性 PCR 的亚组中,使用 PCR-限制性片段长度多态性和基因的 PCR 测序来鉴定种。显微镜检查和/或 PCR 阳性的参与者被认为是确诊的 CL 病例。我们计算了 RDT 与参考标准(ClinicalTrials.gov 注册:NCT02979002)相比的敏感性(Se)和特异性(Sp)。2016 年 12 月至 2017 年 7 月期间,我们共纳入 219 例患者,其中 50%的患者年龄在 18 岁以下。快速诊断检测的 Se 为 68%[95%置信区间(CI):61-74],Sp 为 94%[95% CI:91-97],阳性预测值为 95%[95% CI:92-98],阴性预测值为 64%[95% CI:58-70]。尽管其 Se 较低,但这种新型 RDT 是摩洛哥 CL 临床管理的有用补充,尤其是在偏远地区。RDT 阳性的病变可视为 CL 进行治疗;但是当 RDT 为阴性时,应在第二步进行显微镜检查。通过改进取样程序,可能会优化 RDT 的 Se。