• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

产科在 ARRIVE(诱导与期待管理随机试验)试验和 2019 年冠状病毒病(COVID-19)大流行时代的种族差异。

Obstetric Racial Disparities in the Era of the ARRIVE (A Randomized Trial of Induction Versus Expectant Management) Trial and the Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) Pandemic.

机构信息

Division of Maternal Fetal Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, the Department of Biostatics and Bioinformatics, and the Division of Women's Community and Population Health, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina.

出版信息

Obstet Gynecol. 2024 May 1;143(5):690-699. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000005564. Epub 2024 Mar 28.

DOI:10.1097/AOG.0000000000005564
PMID:38547489
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11031288/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the influence of the ARRIVE (A Randomized Trial of Induction Versus Expectant Management) trial and the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic on racial and ethnic differences in labor induction, pregnancy-associated hypertension, and cesarean delivery among non-Hispanic Black and non-Hispanic White low-risk, first-time pregnancies.

METHODS

We conducted an interrupted time series analysis of U.S. birth certificate data from maternal non-Hispanic Black and non-Hispanic White race and ethnicity, first pregnancy, 39 or more weeks of gestation, with no documented contraindication to vaginal delivery or expectant management beyond 39 weeks. We compared the rate of labor induction (primary outcome), pregnancy-associated hypertension, and cesarean delivery during three time periods: pre-ARRIVE (January 1, 2015-July 31, 2018), post-ARRIVE (November 1, 2018-February 29, 2020), and post-COVID-19 (March 1, 2020-December 31, 2021).

RESULTS

In the post-ARRIVE period, the rate of labor induction increased in both non-Hispanic White and non-Hispanic Black patients, with no statistically significant difference in the magnitude of increase between the two groups (rate ratio for race [RR race ] 0.98, 95% CI, 0.95-1.02, P =.289). Post-COVID-19, the rate of labor induction increased in non-Hispanic White but not non-Hispanic Black patients. The magnitude of the rate change between non-Hispanic White and non-Hispanic Black patients was significant (RR race 0.95, 95% CI, 0.92-0.99, P =.009). Non-Hispanic Black pregnant people were more likely to have pregnancy-associated hypertension and more often delivered by cesarean at all time periods.

CONCLUSION

Changes in obstetric practice after both the ARRIVE trial and the COVID-19 pandemic were not associated with changes in Black-White racial differences in labor induction, cesarean delivery, and pregnancy-associated hypertension.

摘要

目的

评估 ARRIVE(诱导与期待管理随机试验)试验和 2019 年冠状病毒病(COVID-19)大流行对非西班牙裔黑人和非西班牙裔白种人低危初产妇中分娩诱导、妊娠相关高血压和剖宫产术种族和民族差异的影响。

方法

我们对美国母婴非西班牙裔黑人和非西班牙裔白种人种族和民族、初产妇、39 周或以上、无阴道分娩或期待管理至 39 周以上记录禁忌症的出生证明数据进行了一项中断时间序列分析。我们比较了三个时间段的分娩诱导率(主要结局)、妊娠相关高血压和剖宫产术:ARRIVE 之前(2015 年 1 月 1 日-2018 年 7 月 31 日)、ARRIVE 之后(2018 年 11 月 1 日-2020 年 2 月 29 日)和 COVID-19 之后(2020 年 3 月 1 日-2021 年 12 月 31 日)。

结果

在 ARRIVE 之后的时期,非西班牙裔白人和非西班牙裔黑人患者的分娩诱导率均增加,但两组之间增加幅度无统计学差异(种族比值比[RR race ]0.98,95%置信区间,0.95-1.02,P =.289)。COVID-19 后,非西班牙裔白人患者的分娩诱导率增加,但非西班牙裔黑人患者则不然。非西班牙裔白人和非西班牙裔黑人患者之间的速率变化幅度差异有统计学意义(RR race 0.95,95%置信区间,0.92-0.99,P =.009)。在所有时间段,非西班牙裔黑人孕妇更有可能患有妊娠相关高血压,并且更常通过剖宫产分娩。

结论

ARRIVE 试验和 COVID-19 大流行后产科实践的变化与分娩诱导、剖宫产术和妊娠相关高血压的黑人和白人种族差异的变化无关。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4139/11031288/916be064307d/nihms-1971317-f0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4139/11031288/6d9e4ca554ad/nihms-1971317-f0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4139/11031288/301d7915d49d/nihms-1971317-f0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4139/11031288/916be064307d/nihms-1971317-f0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4139/11031288/6d9e4ca554ad/nihms-1971317-f0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4139/11031288/301d7915d49d/nihms-1971317-f0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4139/11031288/916be064307d/nihms-1971317-f0003.jpg

相似文献

1
Obstetric Racial Disparities in the Era of the ARRIVE (A Randomized Trial of Induction Versus Expectant Management) Trial and the Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) Pandemic.产科在 ARRIVE(诱导与期待管理随机试验)试验和 2019 年冠状病毒病(COVID-19)大流行时代的种族差异。
Obstet Gynecol. 2024 May 1;143(5):690-699. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000005564. Epub 2024 Mar 28.
2
Impact of the ARRIVE Trial in Nulliparous Individuals with Morbid Obesity: Interrupted Time Series Analysis.ARRIVE试验对肥胖初产妇的影响:中断时间序列分析。
Am J Perinatol. 2025 Jan;42(1):60-67. doi: 10.1055/s-0044-1787542. Epub 2024 Jun 10.
3
Effects of the ARRIVE (A Randomized Trial of Induction Versus Expectant Management) Trial on Elective Induction and Obstetric Outcomes in Term Nulliparous Patients.ARRIVE(诱导与期待管理随机试验)试验对足月初产妇选择性引产和产科结局的影响。
Obstet Gynecol. 2023 Aug 1;142(2):242-250. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000005217. Epub 2023 Jul 5.
4
Assessing the predictive accuracy of the new vaginal birth after cesarean delivery calculator.评估新式剖宫产术后阴道分娩计算器的预测准确性。
Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM. 2023 Jun;5(6):100960. doi: 10.1016/j.ajogmf.2023.100960. Epub 2023 Apr 5.
5
Racial and Ethnic Differences in Utilization of Labor Management Strategies Intended to Reduce Cesarean Delivery Rates.旨在降低剖宫产率的劳动管理策略使用中的种族和民族差异。
Obstet Gynecol. 2017 Dec;130(6):1285-1294. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000002343.
6
Induction of labor vs expectant management among low-risk patients with 1 prior cesarean delivery.有1次剖宫产史的低风险患者中引产与期待治疗的比较
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2025 Mar;232(3):321.e1-321.e10. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2024.06.001. Epub 2024 Jun 7.
7
Racial and Ethnic Disparities in Postpartum Care in the Greater Boston Area During the COVID-19 Pandemic.大波士顿地区 COVID-19 大流行期间产后护理中的种族和民族差异。
JAMA Netw Open. 2022 Jun 1;5(6):e2216355. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.16355.
8
The relative impact of labor induction versus improved labor management: Before and after the ARRIVE (a randomized trial of induction vs. expectant management) trial.引产与改进的产程管理的相对影响:ARRIVE(引产与期待管理随机试验)试验前后。
Birth. 2024 Dec;51(4):719-727. doi: 10.1111/birt.12845. Epub 2024 Jun 15.
9
Maternal and neonatal outcomes of elective induction of labor.择期引产的母婴结局
Evid Rep Technol Assess (Full Rep). 2009 Mar(176):1-257.
10
Disparities by race/ethnicity in unplanned cesarean birth among healthy nulliparas: a secondary analysis of the nuMoM2b dataset.健康初产妇中计划性剖宫产率的种族/民族差异:nuMoM2b 数据集的二次分析。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2023 May 12;23(1):342. doi: 10.1186/s12884-023-05667-6.

引用本文的文献

1
Examining the Impact of the Syndemic on Black Birthing Individuals in the USA: a Systematic Review.审视并发病症对美国黑人分娩人群的影响:一项系统综述
J Racial Ethn Health Disparities. 2025 Feb 24. doi: 10.1007/s40615-025-02311-1.

本文引用的文献

1
Changes in Rates of Hypertensive Disorders of Pregnancy Among Nulliparous Patients After the ARRIVE (A Randomized Trial of Induction Versus Expectant Management) Trial.ARRIVE 试验(引产与期待治疗的随机试验)后初产妇妊娠高血压疾病发生率的变化。
Obstet Gynecol. 2023 Aug 1;142(2):239-241. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000005239. Epub 2023 Jul 5.
2
Pre and Post-Lockdown Cesarean Deliveries and Perinatal Quality Indicators During the COVID-19 Pandemic.新冠疫情期间封锁前后的剖宫产分娩及围产期质量指标
Dela J Public Health. 2022 Aug 31;8(3):108-112. doi: 10.32481/djph.2022.08.018. eCollection 2022 Aug.
3
Giving Birth in the Early Phases of the COVID-19 Pandemic: The Patient Experience.COVID-19 大流行早期分娩:患者体验。
Matern Child Health J. 2022 Sep;26(9):1753-1761. doi: 10.1007/s10995-022-03495-2. Epub 2022 Jul 27.
4
The impact of coronavirus on reproduction: contraceptive access, pregnancy rates, pregnancy delay, and the role of vaccination.冠状病毒对生殖的影响:避孕措施的可及性、妊娠率、妊娠延迟以及疫苗接种的作用。
F S Rev. 2022 Jul;3(3):190-200. doi: 10.1016/j.xfnr.2022.05.002. Epub 2022 May 30.
5
The influence of racial-ethnic discrimination on women's health care outcomes: A mixed methods systematic review.种族-民族歧视对女性医疗保健结果的影响:一项混合方法的系统评价。
Soc Sci Med. 2023 Jan;316:114983. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2022.114983. Epub 2022 Apr 22.
6
Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine Special Statement: Cognitive bias and medical error in obstetrics-challenges and opportunities.母胎医学会特别声明:妇产科认知偏差和医疗差错——挑战与机遇。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2022 Aug;227(2):B2-B10. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2022.04.033. Epub 2022 Apr 27.
7
Hypertensive Disorders in Pregnancy and Mortality at Delivery Hospitalization - United States, 2017-2019.妊娠高血压疾病与分娩住院期间的死亡率 - 美国,2017-2019 年。
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2022 Apr 29;71(17):585-591. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.mm7117a1.
8
Changes in obstetrical practices and pregnancy outcomes following the ARRIVE trial.ARRIVE试验后产科实践和妊娠结局的变化。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2022 May;226(5):716.e1-716.e12. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2022.02.003. Epub 2022 Feb 6.
9
COVID-19 and Preeclampsia: Overlapping Features in Pregnancy.新型冠状病毒肺炎与子痫前期:妊娠中的重叠特征
Rambam Maimonides Med J. 2022 Jan 27;13(1):e0007. doi: 10.5041/RMMJ.10464.
10
Eliminating Explicit and Implicit Biases in Health Care: Evidence and Research Needs.消除医疗保健中的显性和隐性偏见:证据和研究需求。
Annu Rev Public Health. 2022 Apr 5;43:477-501. doi: 10.1146/annurev-publhealth-052620-103528. Epub 2022 Jan 12.