• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

树种和结构类型水平的结构多样性。

Species and structural diversity of trees at the structural type level.

机构信息

Guangxi Key Laboratory of Forest Ecology and Conservation, College of Forestry, Guangxi University, Nanning, 530004, China.

Laibin Jinxiu Dayaoshan Forest Ecosystem Observation and Research Station of Guangxi. No, Jinxiu County, 95 Gongde Road, Laibin, 545700, Guangxi, China.

出版信息

BMC Ecol Evol. 2024 Mar 28;24(1):40. doi: 10.1186/s12862-024-02229-y.

DOI:10.1186/s12862-024-02229-y
PMID:38549102
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10976781/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Species and structural diversity are important for understanding the formation of forest communities, key ecological processes, and improving forest ecological functions and services, but their spatial characteristics have received little attention. Based on the spatial relationships among neighbouring trees, we proposed to divide trees within a structural unit into 15 structural types, and used the univariate distributions of the uniform angle index (W), mingling (M), and dominance (U), along with four common species diversity indices, to analyse the diversity of structural types in natural forests near the Tropic of Cancer.

RESULTS

Only a portion of clumped class maintained aggregation, most exhibited a random pattern. Species mixture increased exponentially across distribution classes, and abundance and richness exhibited an initial increase followed by a slight decrease. The distribution patterns of mixture classes varied from highly clustered to random, and M distributions gradually shifted from an inverted J-shaped curve to a J-shaped curve. Abundance and richness exhibited an exponential distribution, whereas the Shannon-Wiener index increased linearly. The W distribution of differentiation classes approximated a normal distribution, whereas M distributions exhibited a J shape. The U distribution of each structure type was approximately 0.2.

CONCLUSIONS

These results reveal the species and structural diversity characteristics of trees at the structural type level and expand our knowledge of forest biodiversity. The new method proposed here should significantly contribute to biodiversity monitoring efforts in terrestrial ecosystems, and suggests that higher standards for the simulation and reconstruction of stand structure, as well as thinning in near-natural forests, is warranted.

摘要

背景

物种和结构多样性对于理解森林群落的形成、关键生态过程以及提高森林生态功能和服务至关重要,但它们的空间特征尚未得到充分关注。基于相邻树木之间的空间关系,我们提出将结构单元内的树木划分为 15 种结构类型,并使用均匀角指数 (W)、混交度 (M) 和优势度 (U) 的单变量分布以及四种常见的物种多样性指数来分析近热带地区天然林的结构类型多样性。

结果

仅部分聚集类保持聚集,大多数呈现随机模式。物种混合度随分布类别的增加呈指数增长,丰度和丰富度先增加后略有减少。混合类别的分布模式从高度聚集到随机变化,M 分布逐渐从倒 J 形曲线变为 J 形曲线。丰度和丰富度呈指数分布,而香农-威纳指数呈线性增加。分化类别的 W 分布近似正态分布,而 M 分布呈 J 形。每种结构类型的 U 分布约为 0.2。

结论

这些结果揭示了树木在结构类型水平上的物种和结构多样性特征,并扩展了我们对森林生物多样性的认识。这里提出的新方法应该会极大地促进陆地生态系统的生物多样性监测工作,并表明需要更高的标准来模拟和重建林分结构,以及对近自然林进行疏伐。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/333a/10976781/2aa9ced3d85e/12862_2024_2229_Fig7_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/333a/10976781/93b731066b96/12862_2024_2229_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/333a/10976781/fd0a6b385701/12862_2024_2229_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/333a/10976781/00aaffed53f2/12862_2024_2229_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/333a/10976781/bb5cc56a8743/12862_2024_2229_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/333a/10976781/e345d99a613a/12862_2024_2229_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/333a/10976781/b54539c5b00a/12862_2024_2229_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/333a/10976781/2aa9ced3d85e/12862_2024_2229_Fig7_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/333a/10976781/93b731066b96/12862_2024_2229_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/333a/10976781/fd0a6b385701/12862_2024_2229_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/333a/10976781/00aaffed53f2/12862_2024_2229_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/333a/10976781/bb5cc56a8743/12862_2024_2229_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/333a/10976781/e345d99a613a/12862_2024_2229_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/333a/10976781/b54539c5b00a/12862_2024_2229_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/333a/10976781/2aa9ced3d85e/12862_2024_2229_Fig7_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Species and structural diversity of trees at the structural type level.树种和结构类型水平的结构多样性。
BMC Ecol Evol. 2024 Mar 28;24(1):40. doi: 10.1186/s12862-024-02229-y.
2
Spatial structural characteristics of forests dominated by Pinus tabulaeformis Carr.油松占优势的森林的空间结构特征
PLoS One. 2018 Apr 13;13(4):e0194710. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0194710. eCollection 2018.
3
[Community structure of Quercus aliena var acuteserrata forest in the Taibai Mountain, China].[中国太白山锐齿栎林的群落结构]
Ying Yong Sheng Tai Xue Bao. 2020 Jun;31(6):1923-1932. doi: 10.13287/j.1001-9332.202006.003.
4
The effect of natural disturbances on forest biodiversity: an ecological synthesis.自然干扰对森林生物多样性的影响:生态综合。
Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc. 2022 Oct;97(5):1930-1947. doi: 10.1111/brv.12876. Epub 2022 Jul 8.
5
Fine-scale topographic influence on the spatial distribution of tree species diameter in old-growth beech (Fagus orientalis Lipsky.) forests, northern Iran.细尺度地形对伊朗北部成熟山毛榉(Fagus orientalis Lipsky.)林树种直径空间分布的影响。
Sci Rep. 2022 May 10;12(1):7633. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-10606-0.
6
Spatial Distribution Patterns in the Very Rare and Species-Rich Picea chihuahuana Tree Community (Mexico).奇瓦瓦云杉(墨西哥)极稀有种且物种丰富的树木群落中的空间分布模式
PLoS One. 2015 Oct 23;10(10):e0140442. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0140442. eCollection 2015.
7
Effects of community structure of sprouting forests with different densities on ecosystem carbon density at the early stage of succession.不同密度萌生林群落结构对演替早期生态系统碳密度的影响。
Ying Yong Sheng Tai Xue Bao. 2024 Feb;35(2):289-297. doi: 10.13287/j.1001-9332.202402.014.
8
Changes of vegetation in coniferous monocultures in the context of conversion to mixed forests in 30 years - Implications for biodiversity restoration.30 年来,从针叶纯林向混交林转变过程中的植被变化——对生物多样性恢复的启示。
J Environ Manage. 2023 Oct 1;343:118199. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2023.118199. Epub 2023 May 25.
9
Effects of stand structure and ungulates on understory vegetation in managed and unmanaged forests.林分结构和有蹄类动物对经营和未经营森林林下植被的影响。
Ecol Appl. 2022 Apr;32(3):e2531. doi: 10.1002/eap.2531. Epub 2022 Mar 15.
10
Hydroids (Cnidaria, Hydrozoa) from Mauritanian Coral Mounds.来自毛里塔尼亚珊瑚丘的水螅虫纲动物(刺胞动物门,水螅虫纲)。
Zootaxa. 2020 Nov 16;4878(3):zootaxa.4878.3.2. doi: 10.11646/zootaxa.4878.3.2.

本文引用的文献

1
Pervasive within-species spatial repulsion among adult tropical trees.成年热带树木在种内普遍存在的空间排斥现象。
Science. 2023 Aug 4;381(6657):563-568. doi: 10.1126/science.adg7021. Epub 2023 Aug 3.
2
Phytosociology of stratification in a lowland tropical rainforest occurring north of the Tropic of Cancer in Meghalaya, India.印度梅加拉亚邦北回归线以北低地热带雨林分层的植物社会学
Plant Divers. 2019 Aug 12;41(5):285-299. doi: 10.1016/j.pld.2019.08.001. eCollection 2019 Oct.
3
Competition and coexistence in plant communities: intraspecific competition is stronger than interspecific competition.
植物群落中的竞争与共存:种内竞争比种间竞争更强。
Ecol Lett. 2018 Sep;21(9):1319-1329. doi: 10.1111/ele.13098. Epub 2018 Jun 25.
4
Large trees are surrounded by more heterospecific neighboring trees in Korean pine broad-leaved natural forests.在红松阔叶混交林,大树的周围通常有更多的伴生树种。
Sci Rep. 2018 Jun 14;8(1):9149. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-27140-7.
5
Negative density dependence is stronger in resource-rich environments and diversifies communities when stronger for common but not rare species.在资源丰富的环境中,负密度依赖性更强,当对常见而非稀有物种的作用更强时,会使群落更加多样化。
Ecol Lett. 2016 Jun;19(6):657-67. doi: 10.1111/ele.12603. Epub 2016 Apr 25.
6
Multiple successional pathways in human-modified tropical landscapes: new insights from forest succession, forest fragmentation and landscape ecology research.人类改造的热带景观中的多种演替途径:来自森林演替、森林破碎化和景观生态学研究的新见解。
Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc. 2017 Feb;92(1):326-340. doi: 10.1111/brv.12231. Epub 2015 Nov 5.
7
Forest structure in low-diversity tropical forests: a study of Hawaiian wet and dry forests.低多样性热带森林的森林结构:对夏威夷湿润和干燥森林的研究。
PLoS One. 2014 Aug 27;9(8):e103268. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0103268. eCollection 2014.
8
Point patterns of tree distribution determined by habitat heterogeneity and dispersal limitation.由生境异质性和扩散限制决定的树木分布点格局。
Oecologia. 2011 Jan;165(1):175-84. doi: 10.1007/s00442-010-1718-x. Epub 2010 Jul 18.
9
The future of tropical forests.热带森林的未来。
Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2010 May;1195:1-27. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.2010.05455.x.
10
Spatial patterns in the distribution of tropical tree species.热带树种分布的空间格局。
Science. 2000 May 26;288(5470):1414-8. doi: 10.1126/science.288.5470.1414.