• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

爱尔兰康复教育的共创多方法评估。

A co-created multimethod evaluation of recovery education in Ireland.

机构信息

Business Information Systems, J. E. Cairnes School of Business & Economics, University of Galway, Galway, Ireland.

Department of Nursing and Midwifery, Health Research Institute, University of Limerick, Limerick, Ireland.

出版信息

Health Expect. 2024 Apr;27(2):e13937. doi: 10.1111/hex.13937.

DOI:10.1111/hex.13937
PMID:38549203
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10978797/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

This paper aims to explore the impact of recovery education on recovery knowledge, attitudes and the quality of life of students undertaking recovery education, contributing to the evidence base in relation to the impact of recovery education. It also explores the experiences of all stakeholders involved in the co-facilitation, delivery and participation in recovery education.

SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS

This study evaluates the experiences of stakeholders involved in the co-facilitation, delivery and participation in recovery education across four recovery colleges in Ireland. Participants included students undertaking recovery education, peer educators, education facilitators, recovery college coordinators and practitioner/service providers.

DISCUSSION

Findings from the quantitative survey when compared with extant literature suggest that students had a good understanding of recovery education. The social aspect of empowerment for growth and wellbeing was identified through themes relating to co-production and facilitating student learning. Support for equitable access to recovery education, including co-production for both the public and staff, was identified as a challenge for the future.

CONCLUSION

The findings from both the qualitative and quantitative components of the study show the positive impact of recovery education on stakeholders while acknowledging the need for ongoing support for people working in recovery education and the development of services. In particular, there was a high level of recovery knowledge found in students undertaking recovery education.

PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION

This study utilised a co-created study design. From inception a steering group comprising stakeholders (peer educators, recovery education facilitators including past recovery college students and nonpeer staff involved in the co-production of recovery education) directed the conduct of the evaluation. This steering group participated in an iterative process of information sharing, suggestions for evaluation process and language.

摘要

背景

本文旨在探讨康复教育对接受康复教育的学生的康复知识、态度和生活质量的影响,为康复教育效果的评估提供依据,并探讨在共同促进、实施和参与康复教育过程中所有利益相关者的体验。

设置和参与者

本研究评估了爱尔兰四所康复学院共同促进、实施和参与康复教育过程中所有利益相关者的体验。参与者包括接受康复教育的学生、同伴教育者、教育促进者、康复学院协调员以及从业者/服务提供者。

讨论

定量调查结果与现有文献相比表明,学生对康复教育有很好的理解。通过与共同创作和促进学生学习相关的主题,确定了赋权促进成长和幸福的社会方面。未来的挑战包括支持公平获得康复教育,包括共同创作以惠及公众和员工。

结论

研究的定性和定量部分的结果都表明了康复教育对利益相关者的积极影响,同时也认识到需要为从事康复教育的人员提供持续支持,并需要发展服务。特别是,接受康复教育的学生表现出了很高的康复知识水平。

患者或公众贡献

本研究采用了共同创作的研究设计。从一开始,一个由利益相关者(同伴教育者、包括过去的康复学院学生在内的康复教育促进者,以及参与康复教育共同创作的非同伴工作人员)组成的指导小组就指导了评估的进行。该指导小组参与了信息共享、评估过程和语言建议的迭代过程。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/53fd/10978797/0c1c5c2f44cf/HEX-27-e13937-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/53fd/10978797/0c1c5c2f44cf/HEX-27-e13937-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/53fd/10978797/0c1c5c2f44cf/HEX-27-e13937-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
A co-created multimethod evaluation of recovery education in Ireland.爱尔兰康复教育的共创多方法评估。
Health Expect. 2024 Apr;27(2):e13937. doi: 10.1111/hex.13937.
2
The impact of Recovery Colleges on mental health staff, services and society.康复学院对心理健康工作人员、服务和社会的影响。
Epidemiol Psychiatr Sci. 2019 Oct;28(5):481-488. doi: 10.1017/S204579601800063X. Epub 2018 Oct 23.
3
The meaning of co-production for clinicians: An exploratory case study of Practitioner Trainers in one Recovery College.共同生产对临床医生的意义:对一所康复学院中从业者培训师的探索性案例研究。
J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs. 2018 Jun;25(5-6):349-357. doi: 10.1111/jpm.12469.
4
Evaluation of a national training programme to support engagement in mental health services: Learning enablers and learning gains.评估一个支持参与心理健康服务的国家培训计划:学习促进因素和学习收益。
J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs. 2019 Nov;26(9-10):323-336. doi: 10.1111/jpm.12535. Epub 2019 Oct 7.
5
Impact of summer programmes on the outcomes of disadvantaged or 'at risk' young people: A systematic review.暑期项目对处境不利或“有风险”的年轻人的影响:一项系统综述。
Campbell Syst Rev. 2024 Jun 13;20(2):e1406. doi: 10.1002/cl2.1406. eCollection 2024 Jun.
6
Recovery schools for improving behavioral and academic outcomes among students in recovery from substance use disorders: a systematic review.改善物质使用障碍康复期学生行为和学业成果的康复学校:一项系统综述
Campbell Syst Rev. 2018 Oct 4;14(1):1-86. doi: 10.4073/csr.2018.9. eCollection 2018.
7
What do we not know (yet) about recovery colleges? A study protocol on their (cost-)effectiveness, mechanisms of action, fidelity and positioning.关于康复学院,我们(目前)还不知道什么?一项关于其(成本)效益、作用机制、保真度和定位的研究方案。
BMC Psychiatry. 2023 Nov 8;23(1):816. doi: 10.1186/s12888-023-05293-8.
8
Creating "an oasis of hope, inclusion and connection": students and stakeholders' experiences of a pilot Recovery College.创建“希望、包容和联系的绿洲”:学生和利益相关者对试点康复学院的体验。
J Ment Health. 2024 Feb;33(1):92-100. doi: 10.1080/09638237.2023.2245881. Epub 2023 Aug 28.
9
Student and educator experiences of maternal-child simulation-based learning: a systematic review of qualitative evidence protocol.基于母婴模拟学习的学生和教育工作者体验:定性证据协议的系统评价
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Jan;13(1):14-26. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-1694.
10
Clinical learning experiences of healthcare professional students in a student-led clinical learning environment (SLCLE) - A mixed methods evaluation.医学生主导的临床学习环境(SLCLE)中的临床学习体验 - 混合方法评估。
Nurse Educ Pract. 2024 Aug;79:104035. doi: 10.1016/j.nepr.2024.104035. Epub 2024 Jun 30.

引用本文的文献

1
State-of-the-art literature review of Recovery College evaluative studies between 2013-2024.2013年至2024年间康复学院评估研究的最新文献综述。
Front Psychiatry. 2025 Aug 4;16:1584110. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2025.1584110. eCollection 2025.

本文引用的文献

1
Implementation and evaluation of recovery-oriented practice interventions for people with mental illness in Asia: An integrative review.亚洲精神疾病患者康复导向实践干预措施的实施与评估:一项综合综述。
Int J Nurs Stud. 2023 Nov;147:104591. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2023.104591. Epub 2023 Aug 28.
2
Recovery in Mind: A Recovery College's journey through the Covid-19 pandemic.心的康复:一所康复学院在新冠疫情期间的历程。
Health Expect. 2022 Dec;25(6):3274-3286. doi: 10.1111/hex.13635. Epub 2022 Oct 25.
3
'A lot of small things make a difference'. Mental health and strategies of coping during the COVID-19 pandemic.
“很多小事都有影响”。新冠疫情期间的心理健康和应对策略。
Health Expect. 2022 Apr;25(2):532-540. doi: 10.1111/hex.13416. Epub 2021 Dec 22.
4
Psychological impacts and online interventions of social isolation amongst older adults during COVID-19 pandemic: A scoping review.COVID-19 大流行期间老年人社交隔离的心理影响和在线干预:范围综述。
J Adv Nurs. 2022 Mar;78(3):609-644. doi: 10.1111/jan.15063. Epub 2021 Oct 9.
5
Patient and Public Involvement in research: A journey to co-production.患者和公众参与研究:共同创作之旅。
Patient Educ Couns. 2022 Apr;105(4):1041-1047. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2021.07.021. Epub 2021 Jul 19.
6
Recovery Colleges After a Decade of Research: A Literature Review.康复学院研究十年:文献回顾。
Psychiatr Serv. 2020 Sep 1;71(9):928-940. doi: 10.1176/appi.ps.201900352. Epub 2020 May 28.
7
Expert by experience involvement in mental health nursing education: The co-production of standards between Experts by Experience and academics in mental health nursing.有经验的专家参与心理健康护理教育:在心理健康护理方面,有经验的专家和学者共同制定标准。
J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs. 2020 Oct;27(5):553-562. doi: 10.1111/jpm.12605. Epub 2020 Feb 24.
8
A mixed-methods evaluation of a Recovery College in South East Essex for people with mental health difficulties.东南埃塞克斯康复学院对心理健康困难人群的混合方法评估。
Health Soc Care Community. 2019 Sep;27(5):1353-1362. doi: 10.1111/hsc.12774. Epub 2019 Jun 3.
9
Mechanisms of Action and Outcomes for Students in Recovery Colleges.康复学院学生的作用机制和结果。
Psychiatr Serv. 2018 Dec 1;69(12):1222-1229. doi: 10.1176/appi.ps.201800283. Epub 2018 Sep 17.
10
Mixed methods research: expanding the evidence base.混合方法研究:扩大证据基础。
Evid Based Nurs. 2017 Jul;20(3):74-75. doi: 10.1136/eb-2017-102699. Epub 2017 Jun 14.