The School of Nursing, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, China.
Department of Natural Sciences/Nursing, University of Houston-Downtown, Houston, Texas, USA.
J Clin Nurs. 2024 Aug;33(8):2829-2848. doi: 10.1111/jocn.17121. Epub 2024 Mar 28.
Patients often consider bone marrow aspiration and biopsy to be one of the most painful medical procedures. The effectiveness of non-pharmacological interventions to reduce pain during bone marrow aspiration and biopsy remains unclear.
To synthesize existing evidence regarding the effectiveness of non-pharmacological interventions in mitigating procedural pain among patients undergoing bone marrow aspiration and biopsy.
A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
Six electronic databases, including PubMed, EMBASE, CINAHL, PsycINFO, Cochrane Library and Web of Science were searched from inception to July 15, 2023. The risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool Version 2.0. Meta-analysis was conducted using STATA 16. The certainty of the evidence was assessed by the GRADE approach.
This meta-analysis included 18 studies derived from 17 articles involving a total of 1017 participants. The pooled results revealed statistically significant pain reduction effects using distraction (SMD: -.845, 95% CI: -1.344 to -.346, p < .001), powered bone marrow biopsy system (SMD: -.266, 95% CI: -.529 to -.003, p = .048), and acupoint stimulation (SMD: -1.016, 95% CI: -1.995 to -.037, p = .042) among patients undergoing bone marrow aspiration and biopsy. However, the pooled results on hypnosis (SMD: -1.228, 95% CI: -4.091 to 1.515, p = .368) showed no significant impact on pain reduction. Additionally, the pooled results for distraction did not demonstrate a significant effect on operative anxiety (MD: -2.942, 95% CI: -7.650 to 1.767, p = .221).
Distraction, powered bone marrow biopsy system and acupoint stimulation are effective in reducing pain among patients undergoing bone marrow aspiration and biopsy.
Not applicable.
This meta-analysis highlights the effectiveness of distraction, powered bone marrow biopsy system and acupoint stimulation for reducing pain in patients undergoing bone marrow biopsy. Healthcare professionals should consider integrating these interventions into pain management practices for these patients.
(PROSPERO): CRD42023422854.
患者通常认为骨髓穿刺和活检是最痛苦的医疗程序之一。非药物干预措施在减轻骨髓穿刺和活检过程中的疼痛方面的有效性仍不清楚。
综合现有证据,评估非药物干预措施在减轻骨髓穿刺和活检患者程序性疼痛方面的效果。
系统评价和随机对照试验的荟萃分析。
从建库至 2023 年 7 月 15 日,检索了 6 个电子数据库,包括 PubMed、EMBASE、CINAHL、PsycINFO、Cochrane 图书馆和 Web of Science。使用 Cochrane 偏倚风险工具 2.0 评估偏倚风险。使用 STATA 16 进行荟萃分析。使用 GRADE 方法评估证据的确定性。
本荟萃分析纳入了源自 17 篇文章的 18 项研究,共涉及 1017 名参与者。汇总结果显示,使用分散注意力(SMD:-0.845,95%CI:-1.344 至 -0.346,p<0.001)、动力骨髓活检系统(SMD:-0.266,95%CI:-0.529 至 -0.003,p=0.048)和穴位刺激(SMD:-1.016,95%CI:-1.995 至 -0.037,p=0.042)可显著减轻患者的疼痛。然而,催眠(SMD:-1.228,95%CI:-4.091 至 1.515,p=0.368)的汇总结果显示对疼痛减轻没有显著影响。此外,分散注意力的汇总结果对手术焦虑没有显著影响(MD:-2.942,95%CI:-7.650 至 1.767,p=0.221)。
分散注意力、动力骨髓活检系统和穴位刺激在减轻骨髓穿刺和活检患者的疼痛方面是有效的。
不适用。
本荟萃分析强调了分散注意力、动力骨髓活检系统和穴位刺激在减轻骨髓活检患者疼痛方面的有效性。医疗保健专业人员应考虑将这些干预措施纳入这些患者的疼痛管理实践中。
(PROSPERO):CRD42023422854。