Emm-Collison Lydia, Walker Robert, Salway Ruth, House Danielle, Sansum Kate, Breheny Katie, Churchward Sarah, Williams Joanna G, de Vocht Frank, Jago Russell
Centre for Exercise, Nutrition & Health Sciences, School for Policy Studies, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.
Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.
Public Health Res (Southampt). 2024 Mar;12(16):105-146. doi: 10.3310/KPKW8220.
The COVID-19 lockdowns impacted physical activity for all, but especially parents, because they had to balance home, work and leisure activities. Motivation for exercise is consistently shown to be associated with physical activity levels. Self-determination theory provides a framework through which the motivation for exercise and its social-contextual antecedents can be explored. The purpose of this study is to explore the role of motivation in determining physical activity in parents and carers of English primary school children before, during and after the COVID-19 lockdowns.
DESIGN, SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: This study uses a mixed-methods design combining quantitative data and individual interviews. Participants were all parents/carers of children in year 6 (aged 10-11 years) at English primary schools in the United Kingdom.
Quantitative data were collected on three occasions: between March 2017 and May 2018 (Wave 0, = 1296), between May and December 2021 (Wave 1, = 393) and between January and July 2022 (wave 2, = 436). Motivation for exercise was assessed using the Behavioural Regulations in Exercise Questionnaire-2 and moderate-to-vigorous physical activity was estimated via waist-worn accelerometers. Data were analysed via regression models. Interviews with a subsample of parents ( = 43) were conducted on two occasions: between September and December 2021 and between February and July 2022. Interviews covered the impact of the pandemic on children and parents' physical activity and changes over time. This study focuses on discussions around the parents' own physical activity behaviour and their motivation. The framework method was used for analysis.
In separate linear regression models, intrinsic and identified regulation were associated with higher moderate-to-vigorous physical activity in waves 0 and 2. Amotivation was associated with lower moderate-to-vigorous physical activity in waves 0 and 2. In fully adjusted multivariable regression models, identified regulation was associated with a 4.9-minute increase in moderate-to-vigorous physical activity and introjected regulation was associated with a 2.3-minute decrease in moderate-to-vigorous physical activity at wave 0. Associations with moderate-to-vigorous physical activity were different in wave 2, with introjected regulation changing direction and a negative association with amotivation, although confidence intervals were wide due to smaller sample sizes. In the interviews, parents spoke of the effects that the COVID-19 lockdowns had on their motivation to be physically active in four theoretically driven themes: (1) motivation for physical activity, (2) perceived autonomy for physical activity, (3) perceived competence for physical activity and (4) perceived relatedness for physical activity.
The smaller sample sizes for waves 1 and 2 may have limited the ability to identify associations between behavioural regulations and moderate-to-vigorous physical activity post pandemic. Across all waves, parents were predominantly active, females, white and from higher socioeconomic areas and therefore may not reflect broader experiences.
Autonomous motivation, especially enjoyment and the importance for mental and physical well-being, was a key driver in keeping parents active during lockdowns and remains important for physical activity post lockdown, with introjected regulation potentially playing an increased role. Parents' interviews highlighted that while for some the lockdowns autonomous motivation for exercise, others had enduring influences on their autonomy, competence and relatedness, which could be detrimental to their well-being. Strategies that focus on offering a range of novel activities for parents and that bring parent groups together may be effective.
This article presents independent research funded by the National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) Public Health Research programme as award number NIHR131847.
新冠疫情封锁措施影响了所有人的身体活动,但对家长的影响尤为明显,因为他们必须平衡家庭、工作和休闲活动。研究一直表明,运动动机与身体活动水平相关。自我决定理论提供了一个框架,通过该框架可以探索运动动机及其社会背景前因。本研究的目的是探讨动机在新冠疫情封锁之前、期间和之后英国小学六年级学生的家长及照料者身体活动决定中的作用。
设计、背景与参与者:本研究采用混合方法设计,将定量数据与个人访谈相结合。参与者均为英国小学六年级(10至11岁)学生的家长/照料者。
在三个时间段收集定量数据:2017年3月至2018年5月(第0波,n = 1296)、2021年5月至12月(第1波,n = 393)以及2022年1月至7月(第2波,n = 436)。使用运动行为调节问卷-2评估运动动机,并通过佩戴在腰部的加速度计估计中度至剧烈身体活动。通过回归模型分析数据。对一部分家长(n = 43)进行了两次访谈:2021年9月至12月以及2022年2月至7月。访谈内容涵盖了疫情对儿童和家长身体活动的影响以及随时间的变化。本研究重点关注围绕家长自身身体活动行为及其动机的讨论。采用框架法进行分析。
在单独的线性回归模型中,内在调节和认同调节与第0波和第2波中较高的中度至剧烈身体活动相关。无动机调节与第0波和第2波中较低的中度至剧烈身体活动相关。在完全调整的多变量回归模型中,认同调节与第0波中中度至剧烈身体活动增加4.9分钟相关,而内摄调节与第0波中中度至剧烈身体活动减少2.3分钟相关。在第2波中,与中度至剧烈身体活动的关联有所不同,内摄调节方向改变且与无动机调节呈负相关,不过由于样本量较小,置信区间较宽。在访谈中,家长们谈到了新冠疫情封锁措施在四个理论驱动主题方面对他们身体活动动机的影响:(1)身体活动动机,(2)身体活动的自主感,(3)身体活动能力感,(4)身体活动的关联感。
第1波和第2波的样本量较小,可能限制了识别疫情后行为调节与中度至剧烈身体活动之间关联的能力。在所有波次中,家长主要是活跃的、女性、白人且来自社会经济地位较高的地区,因此可能无法反映更广泛的情况。
自主动机,尤其是享受运动以及运动对身心健康重要性的认知,是在封锁期间促使家长保持活跃的关键驱动力,并且在封锁后对身体活动仍然很重要,内摄调节可能发挥越来越大的作用。家长访谈强调,虽然对一些人来说封锁增强了他们运动的自主动机,但对另一些人来说,封锁对他们的自主性、能力感和关联感产生了持久影响,这可能对他们的幸福感不利。专注于为家长提供一系列新颖活动并将家长群体聚集在一起的策略可能会有效。
本文介绍了由英国国家卫生与保健研究机构(NIHR)公共卫生研究项目资助的独立研究,项目编号为NIHR131847。