Capodaglio Paolo, Lippi Lorenzo, Folli Arianna, Trotti Giulia, Aspesi Valentina, Turco Alessio, de Sire Alessandro, Invernizzi Marco
Orthopaedic Rehabilitation Unit and Research Laboratory in Biomechanics, Rehabilitation and Ergonomics, Istituto Auxologico Italiano, Piancavallo, Italy.
Department of Surgical Sciences, Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, University of Torino, Torino, Italy.
Turk J Phys Med Rehabil. 2023 Dec 14;70(1):39-46. doi: 10.5606/tftrd.2024.12573. eCollection 2024 Mar.
This study aimed to assess the impact of add-on pelvic floor exercises on a weight management rehabilitation program.
This proof of principle study was conducted between July 2019 and December 2019. Ninety-three adult female inpatients with obesity and diagnosis of urinary incontinence (UI) were assessed for inclusion, and the suitable patients were randomly assigned to the experimental group and the control group. Both groups underwent a weight management rehabilitation program, while the experimental group also performed pelvic floor exercises. The primary outcome was UI severity, assessed by the 1-h pad test. Secondary outcomes were urinary symptoms, assessed by the International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire Short Form (ICIQ-SF), Patient Global Impression of Improvement (PGI-I), and Incontinence Quality of Life Questionnaire (I-QOL).
Sixty female inpatients were randomly assigned to the experimental group [n=30; median age: 64.50 (51.25 to 70.50) years] or the control group [n=30; median age: 67.50 (58.50 to 74.75) years]. The experimental group showed a statistically significant reduction in UI severity [pad test: 2.08 (1.21 to 8.85) g 0.54 (0.24 to 1.13) g, p<0.01; ICIQ-SF: 14.00 (10.25 to 17.00) 8.00 (6.25 to 11.75), p<0.01; I-QOL: 56.37 (42.28 to 73.64) 78.64 (64.32 to 90.68), p<0.01]. Statistically significant differences were found in the between-groups analysis [pad test: 0.54 (0.24 to 1.13) g 1.08 (0.83 to 3.86) g, p<0.01; ICIQ-SF: 8.00 (6.25 to 11.75) 12.00 (10.00 to 16.00), p<0.01; I-QOL: 78.64 (64.32 to 90.68) 68.18 (60.00 to 84.32), p<0.01].
Including pelvic floor exercises might provide additional benefits compared to standard rehabilitation in reducing UI symptoms in obese women.
本研究旨在评估附加盆底肌锻炼对体重管理康复计划的影响。
本原理验证研究于2019年7月至2019年12月进行。对93名肥胖且诊断为尿失禁(UI)的成年女性住院患者进行纳入评估,将合适的患者随机分为实验组和对照组。两组均接受体重管理康复计划,而实验组还进行盆底肌锻炼。主要结局是通过1小时垫试验评估的尿失禁严重程度。次要结局是通过国际尿失禁咨询问卷简表(ICIQ-SF)、患者总体改善印象(PGI-I)和尿失禁生活质量问卷(I-QOL)评估的泌尿症状。
60名女性住院患者被随机分配到实验组[n = 30;中位年龄:64.50(51.25至70.50)岁]或对照组[n = 30;中位年龄:67.50(58.50至74.75)岁]。实验组在尿失禁严重程度方面显示出统计学上的显著降低[垫试验:从2.08(1.21至8.85)克降至0.54(0.24至1.13)克,p<0.01;ICIQ-SF:从14.00(10.25至17.00)降至8.00(6.25至11.75),p<0.01;I-QOL:从56.37(42.28至73.64)降至78.64(64.32至90.68),p<0.01]。组间分析发现统计学上的显著差异[垫试验:0.54(0.24至1.13)克对1.08(0.83至3.86)克,p<0.01;ICIQ-SF:8.00(6.25至11.75)对12.