de Sire Alessandro, Invernizzi Marco, Baricich Alessio, Lippi Lorenzo, Ammendolia Antonio, Grassi Federico Alberto, Leigheb Massimiliano
Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, University of Catanzaro "Magna Graecia," Catanzaro 88100, Italy.
Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Department of Health Sciences, University of Piemonte Orientale, Novara 28100, Italy.
World J Orthop. 2021 Jul 18;12(7):456-466. doi: 10.5312/wjo.v12.i7.456.
Fractures of femur proximal extremity (FFPE) are the most common fragility fractures requiring hospitalization, with a high risk of mortality, low independence in the activities of daily living and severe consequences on health-related quality of life. Timing for surgery has a key role in the management of elderly patients with FFPE as recommended by the Australian and New Zealand guidelines and the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence guidelines. Early surgery (within 48 h from hospital admission) allows significant benefits in terms of lower rates of postoperative complications and risk of death and can provide better functional outcomes. Therefore, time for surgery could be considered as a comorbidity marker. The choice between conservative or surgical approach surprisingly seems to be still not strongly supported by available literature, but it seems that both 30 d and 1 year risk of mortality is higher with the conservative treatment rather than with surgery. In light of these considerations, the optimization of FFPE management care is mandatory to improve functional outcomes and to reduce sanitary costs. Albeit it is widely accepted that transdisciplinary approach to patients suffering from FFPE is mandatory to optimize both short-term and long-term outcomes, the feasibility of a comprehensive approach in clinical practice is still a challenge. In particular, the large variability of figures involved could be considered both a resource and an additional disadvantage taking into account the difficulty to coordinate multidisciplinary approach covering care in all settings. Therefore, the aim of the present article was to summarize current evidence supporting transdisciplinary management of patients with FFPE, highlighting the benefits, feasibility and limitations of this approach.
股骨近端骨折(FFPE)是最常见的需要住院治疗的脆性骨折,具有高死亡风险、日常生活活动独立性低以及对健康相关生活质量有严重影响。正如澳大利亚和新西兰指南以及英国国家卫生与临床优化研究所指南所推荐的,手术时机在老年FFPE患者的管理中起着关键作用。早期手术(入院后48小时内)在降低术后并发症发生率和死亡风险方面有显著益处,并且能提供更好的功能结局。因此,手术时间可被视为一种合并症标志物。令人惊讶的是,现有文献似乎仍未有力支持保守治疗或手术治疗方法之间的选择,但保守治疗的30天和1年死亡风险似乎高于手术治疗。鉴于这些考虑因素,优化FFPE的管理护理对于改善功能结局和降低医疗成本是必不可少的。尽管人们普遍认为,对FFPE患者采用跨学科方法对于优化短期和长期结局是必不可少的,但在临床实践中采用综合方法的可行性仍然是一项挑战。特别是,考虑到协调涵盖所有环境护理的多学科方法存在困难,所涉及数据的巨大变异性既可以被视为一种资源,也可以被视为一个额外的不利因素。因此,本文的目的是总结支持FFPE患者跨学科管理的现有证据,突出这种方法的益处、可行性和局限性。