Suppr超能文献

双固化树脂水门汀与光固化树脂水门汀用于根面间接修复体粘结强度的比较评价:一项体外分析研究。

Comparative Evaluation of Bond Strengths Between Dual Cure Resin Cement and Light Cure Resin Cement in Root Surface Indirect Restorations: An In Vitro Analysis Study.

作者信息

Desai Karishma, S M Karthickraj

机构信息

Department of Periodontics, Saveetha Dental College and Hospitals, Saveetha Institute of Medical and Technical Sciences, Saveetha University, Chennai, IND.

出版信息

Cureus. 2024 Feb 26;16(2):e55009. doi: 10.7759/cureus.55009. eCollection 2024 Feb.

Abstract

Aim The aim of this study was to evaluate the shear bond strength between dual cure and light cure resin cements in root surface indirect restorations. Materials and methods Ten recently extracted human teeth were selected. Cylindrical blocks of resin were prepared and bonded near the Cemento-Enamel Junction (CEJ) of the prepared teeth to mimic the restoration at the root surface. The samples were randomly luted to the root surface using the light cure (Calibra Veneer, Dentsply Sirona, India) and dual cure (Fusion Ultra D/C, DenPro, USA) forming two groups. The bond strength was checked using the INSTRON 3000 device (INSTRON, MA, USA). The point of fracture of the prepared sample from the tooth surface was noted. All readings were tabulated and further statistically analyzed. Results On comparing the two groups, it was found that the light cured resin had a greater mean shear bond strength (57 N) than the dual cure resin cement (41 N). The difference in the mean value of the shear bond strength between two resin cements was found to be statistically not significant according to independent T-test analysis using Levene's Test (P>0.05). Conclusion From the results obtained and within the limits of the study conducted, we can infer that Calibra Veneer is a more viable option for luting to the root surface area. On the other hand, Fusion Ultra Dual cure resin cement seems to have similar results but has a lower bond strength than the other.

摘要

目的 本研究旨在评估双重固化树脂水门汀和光固化树脂水门汀在牙根表面间接修复体中的剪切粘结强度。

材料与方法 选取10颗近期拔除的人牙。制备树脂圆柱形块,并粘结在制备牙齿的牙骨质-釉质界(CEJ)附近,以模拟牙根表面的修复体。样本随机分为两组,分别使用光固化树脂水门汀(Calibra Veneer,登士柏西诺德,印度)和双重固化树脂水门汀(Fusion Ultra D/C,登普乐,美国)粘结到牙根表面。使用INSTRON 3000设备(INSTRON,马萨诸塞州,美国)检查粘结强度。记录制备样本从牙齿表面断裂的点。所有读数制成表格并进行进一步的统计分析。

结果 比较两组发现,光固化树脂的平均剪切粘结强度(57 N)高于双重固化树脂水门汀(41 N)。根据使用Levene检验的独立T检验分析,两种树脂水门汀的剪切粘结强度平均值差异在统计学上不显著(P>0.05)。

结论 根据获得的结果并在所进行研究的范围内,我们可以推断Calibra Veneer是粘结到牙根表面区域更可行的选择。另一方面,Fusion Ultra双重固化树脂水门汀似乎有相似的结果,但粘结强度低于另一种。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3974/10973790/2b6e7eccbe43/cureus-0016-00000055009-i01.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验