Alves Hans, Yzerbyt Vincent, Unkelbach Christian
Ruhr University Bochum, Germany.
Université Catholique de Louvain, Louvain-la-Neuve, Belgium.
Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2025 Oct;51(10):1987-2001. doi: 10.1177/01461672241235387. Epub 2024 Mar 29.
We investigate how the complexity of the social environment (more vs. less groups) influences attitude formation. We hypothesize that facing a larger number of groups renders learning processes about these groups noisier and more regressive, which has two important implications. First, more-complex social environments should lead perceivers to underestimate actual group differences. Second, because most people usually behave positively, more-complex social environments produce negatively biased attitudes and cause perceivers to overestimate the frequency of "negative" individuals among groups. We tested these predictions in five attitude formation experiments (=2,414). Participants' attitudes and learned base rates of positive and negative group members proved more regressive in complex social environments, that is, with multiple groups, compared with less-complex environments, that is, with fewer groups. In a predominantly positive social environment, this regression caused participants to form more negative group attitudes and more strongly overestimate negative individuals' prevalence among groups.
我们研究社会环境的复杂性(群体较多与群体较少)如何影响态度形成。我们假设,面对更多数量的群体,会使关于这些群体的学习过程更嘈杂且更具回归性,这有两个重要影响。首先,更复杂的社会环境应会导致感知者低估实际的群体差异。其次,由于大多数人通常表现积极,更复杂的社会环境会产生负向偏差态度,并使感知者高估群体中“负面”个体的出现频率。我们在五个态度形成实验(N = 2414)中检验了这些预测。与不太复杂的环境(即群体较少)相比,在复杂社会环境(即多个群体)中,参与者的态度以及对积极和消极群体成员的习得基础概率表现出更强的回归性。在一个以积极为主的社会环境中,这种回归导致参与者形成更消极的群体态度,并更强烈地高估群体中消极个体的普遍性。