• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

错觉相关的合理性。

The rationality of illusory correlation.

机构信息

School of Computer Science, University College Dublin.

Department of Theoretical Physics, National University of Ireland.

出版信息

Psychol Rev. 2019 Apr;126(3):437-450. doi: 10.1037/rev0000130. Epub 2019 Jan 24.

DOI:10.1037/rev0000130
PMID:30676041
Abstract

When presented with 2 samples (a smaller sample from a Minority population and a larger sample from a Majority population), where some rare or frequent features occur at exactly the same rate in both samples, people reliably associate the rare feature with the Minority population and the frequent feature with the Majority population. This pattern is referred to as "illusory correlation," reflecting the standard assumption that such associations are fundamentally irrational. In this article we show that this assumption is incorrect, and demonstrate that this pattern of association linking rare features with the Minority and frequent features with the Majority (given a sample where those features occurred at the same proportion in both categories, and no further information) is in fact correct and follows a result in epistemic probability theory known as the "Rule of Succession." Building on this result, we present a new computational model of frequency-based illusory correlation, based on the Rule of Succession. We also discuss the implications of the Rule of Succession for our understanding of various other cognitive biases. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2019 APA, all rights reserved).

摘要

当呈现两个样本(一个来自少数群体的较小样本和一个来自多数群体的较大样本),其中一些稀有或常见的特征在两个样本中以完全相同的频率出现时,人们会可靠地将稀有特征与少数群体相关联,将常见特征与多数群体相关联。这种模式被称为“虚幻相关”,反映了这样一种标准假设,即这种关联从根本上说是不合理的。在本文中,我们表明这种假设是不正确的,并证明了这种将稀有特征与少数群体相关联,将常见特征与多数群体相关联的关联模式(在样本中,这些特征在两个类别中的比例相同,且没有其他信息)实际上是正确的,并且遵循了认知概率理论中的一个结果,称为“后继规则”。基于这一结果,我们提出了一种基于后继规则的基于频率的虚幻相关的新计算模型。我们还讨论了后继规则对我们理解各种其他认知偏差的影响。(PsycINFO 数据库记录(c)2019 APA,保留所有权利)。

相似文献

1
The rationality of illusory correlation.错觉相关的合理性。
Psychol Rev. 2019 Apr;126(3):437-450. doi: 10.1037/rev0000130. Epub 2019 Jan 24.
2
Normative accounts of illusory correlations.规范性解释错觉相关。
Psychol Rev. 2021 Oct;128(5):856-878. doi: 10.1037/rev0000273. Epub 2021 Jun 17.
3
People's conditional probability judgments follow probability theory (plus noise).人们的条件概率判断遵循概率论(加上噪声)。
Cogn Psychol. 2016 Sep;89:106-33. doi: 10.1016/j.cogpsych.2016.06.006. Epub 2016 Aug 26.
4
Deliberative thinking increases tolerance of minority group practices: Testing a dual-process model of tolerance.审慎思维会增加对少数群体做法的容忍度:检验容忍的双重过程模型。
J Exp Psychol Appl. 2023 Jun;29(2):414-424. doi: 10.1037/xap0000429. Epub 2022 Jul 14.
5
Invariants in probabilistic reasoning.概率推理中的不变量。
Cogn Psychol. 2018 Feb;100:1-16. doi: 10.1016/j.cogpsych.2017.11.003. Epub 2017 Dec 6.
6
No correlation, no evidence for attention shift in category learning: different mechanisms behind illusory correlations and the inverse base-rate effect.类别学习中无关联、无注意转移证据:错觉相关和逆基本比率效应背后的不同机制。
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2015 Feb;144(1):58-75. doi: 10.1037/a0038462. Epub 2014 Dec 8.
7
Surprising rationality in probability judgment: Assessing two competing models.概率判断中的惊人理性:评估两种竞争模型。
Cognition. 2018 Jan;170:280-297. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2017.08.012. Epub 2017 Nov 5.
8
Memory and decision making: Effects of sequential presentation of probabilities and outcomes in risky prospects.记忆与决策:风险情境中概率和结果相继呈现的影响。
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2019 Feb;148(2):304-324. doi: 10.1037/xge0000438. Epub 2018 Jun 7.
9
The moral foundations of illusory correlation.虚假相关的道德基础。
PLoS One. 2017 Oct 3;12(10):e0185758. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0185758. eCollection 2017.
10
Probability theory plus noise: Replies to Crupi and Tentori (2016) and to Nilsson, Juslin, and Winman (2016).概率论加噪声:对克鲁皮和滕托里(2016)以及尼尔森、尤斯林和温曼(2016)的回复。
Psychol Rev. 2016 Jan;123(1):112-23. doi: 10.1037/rev0000018.

引用本文的文献

1
Attitude Formation in More- and Less-Complex Social Environments.在复杂程度较高和较低的社会环境中态度的形成。
Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2025 Oct;51(10):1987-2001. doi: 10.1177/01461672241235387. Epub 2024 Mar 29.
2
Structure learning principles of stereotype change.刻板印象改变的结构学习原则。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2023 Aug;30(4):1273-1293. doi: 10.3758/s13423-023-02252-y. Epub 2023 Mar 27.
3
On the Irrationality of Being in Two Minds.论犹豫不决的非理性
Entropy (Basel). 2020 Feb 4;22(2):174. doi: 10.3390/e22020174.
4
Bistable probabilities: a unified framework for studying rationality and irrationality in classical and quantum games.双稳态概率:研究经典和量子博弈中理性与非理性的统一框架。
Proc Math Phys Eng Sci. 2020 May;476(2237):20190839. doi: 10.1098/rspa.2019.0839. Epub 2020 May 13.
5
The Bayesian sampler: Generic Bayesian inference causes incoherence in human probability judgments.贝叶斯抽样器:通用贝叶斯推理导致人类概率判断不一致。
Psychol Rev. 2020 Oct;127(5):719-748. doi: 10.1037/rev0000190. Epub 2020 Mar 19.