• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

临床医生情感反应(CARE)量表的编制与初步验证

Development and preliminary validation of the Clinician Affective REsponse (CARE) scale.

作者信息

Stefana Alberto, Fusar-Poli Paolo, Langfus Joshua, Vieta Eduard, Youngstrom Eric

机构信息

Department of Brain and Behavioral Sciences, University of Pavia.

Department of Brain and Behavioral Sciences, University of Pavia, Italy; OASIS Service, South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust, London; Early Psychosis: Interventions and Clinical-detection Lab, Department of Psychosis Studies, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London.

出版信息

Res Psychother. 2024 Mar 21;27(1):736. doi: 10.4081/ripppo.2024.736.

DOI:10.4081/ripppo.2024.736
PMID:38551502
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11064772/
Abstract

The present study reports on the development and validation of the clinician affective response (CARE) scale. The CARE scale was designed as a self-report measure of therapists' patterns of thoughts, feelings, and behaviors toward the patient during an individual psychotherapy session. An initial pool of 116 items was generated, and its quality was evaluated by subject matter experts. Validation data were gathered from licensed psychotherapists (n=554). We used exploratory factor analysis and item response theory-graded response modeling to select items, confirmatory factor analysis to test how well the factor structure fit the data, and k-fold cross-validation to ascertain the robustness of the model. Criterion validity was evaluated by correlating the scores of the scale with the characteristics of therapists, patients, and treatment. The selected model consists of 15 items and a 3-factor structure, which showed excellent model fit, good internal consistency, and evidence of criterion validity. The CARE scale, short and quick to complete, enables therapists to reflect on and recognize their inner experiences and quantify these experiences in ways conducive to statistical analysis and research. Furthermore, the monitoring of these affective reactions toward their patients can guide therapeutic interventions and inform clinical supervisors.

摘要

本研究报告了临床医生情感反应(CARE)量表的开发与验证情况。CARE量表旨在作为一种自我报告测量工具,用于评估治疗师在个体心理治疗过程中对患者的思维、情感和行为模式。最初生成了116个项目的题库,并由主题专家对其质量进行评估。验证数据来自有执照的心理治疗师(n = 554)。我们使用探索性因素分析和项目反应理论分级反应模型来选择项目,使用验证性因素分析来检验因素结构与数据的拟合程度,并使用k折交叉验证来确定模型的稳健性。通过将量表得分与治疗师、患者和治疗的特征进行关联来评估效标效度。所选模型由15个项目和一个三因素结构组成,显示出良好的模型拟合、良好的内部一致性以及效标效度的证据。CARE量表简短且易于完成,使治疗师能够反思并认识自己的内心体验,并以有利于统计分析和研究的方式对这些体验进行量化。此外,监测对患者的这些情感反应可以指导治疗干预并为临床督导提供信息。

相似文献

1
Development and preliminary validation of the Clinician Affective REsponse (CARE) scale.临床医生情感反应(CARE)量表的编制与初步验证
Res Psychother. 2024 Mar 21;27(1):736. doi: 10.4081/ripppo.2024.736.
2
Development and Initial Validation of the in-Session Patient Affective Reactions Questionnaire (SPARQ) and the Rift In-Session Questionnaire (RISQ).会话期间患者情感反应问卷(SPARQ)和会话期间裂痕问卷(RISQ)的开发与初步验证。
J Clin Med. 2023 Aug 7;12(15):5156. doi: 10.3390/jcm12155156.
3
Assessing the patient's affective perception of their psychotherapist: validation of the .评估患者对其心理治疗师的情感认知:对……的验证
Front Psychiatry. 2024 Apr 24;15:1346760. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2024.1346760. eCollection 2024.
4
LC-PROM: Validation of a patient reported outcomes measure for liver cirrhosis patients.LC-PROM:一项针对肝硬化患者的患者报告结局指标的验证
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2016 May 10;14:75. doi: 10.1186/s12955-016-0482-y.
5
Does Therapists' Disengaged Feelings Influence the Effect of Transference Work? A Study on Countertransference.治疗师的疏离感会影响移情工作的效果吗?一项关于反移情的研究。
Clin Psychol Psychother. 2017 Mar;24(2):462-474. doi: 10.1002/cpp.2015. Epub 2016 Apr 25.
6
[Factorial analysis and internal consistency of the French version of the Toronto Alexithymia Scale (TAS 20), in obese women].[肥胖女性中多伦多述情障碍量表(TAS 20)法语版的因子分析与内部一致性]
Encephale. 2002 Jul-Aug;28(4):277-82.
7
Development and validation of safety climate scales for mobile remote workers using utility/electrical workers as exemplar.开发并验证使用电力/电工作为范例的移动远程工作者安全氛围量表。
Accid Anal Prev. 2013 Oct;59:76-86. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2013.04.030. Epub 2013 May 10.
8
The Development of Two New Computer Adaptive Tests To Evaluate Feelings of Loss in Caregivers of Individuals With Traumatic Brain Injury: TBI-CareQOL Feelings of Loss-Self and Feelings of Loss-Person With Traumatic Brain Injury.开发两个新的计算机自适应测试来评估创伤性脑损伤患者照顾者的失落感:TBI-CareQOL 失落感-自我和创伤性脑损伤患者的失落感-人。
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2019 Apr;100(4S):S31-S42. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2018.05.026. Epub 2018 Jun 26.
9
Development and psychometric validation of the hospitalized older adults' dignity scale for measuring dignity during acute hospitalization.住院老年患者尊严量表的编制及在急性住院期间测量尊严的心理测量学验证。
J Adv Nurs. 2023 Oct;79(10):4058-4073. doi: 10.1111/jan.15714. Epub 2023 May 24.
10
The Chinese version of the Perceived Stress Questionnaire: development and validation amongst medical students and workers.中文版的感知压力问卷:医学生和医务人员的编制与验证。
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2020 Mar 13;18(1):70. doi: 10.1186/s12955-020-01307-1.

引用本文的文献

1
Psychological, psychiatric, and behavioral sciences measurement scales: best practice guidelines for their development and validation.心理、精神和行为科学测量量表:其编制与验证的最佳实践指南
Front Psychol. 2025 Jan 23;15:1494261. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1494261. eCollection 2024.
2
Therapeutic relationship elements and therapy session outcomes: Protocol for a longitudinal study of the patient's perspective.治疗关系要素与治疗 session 结果:一项从患者角度进行纵向研究的方案
Open Res Eur. 2024 Jun 4;3:133. doi: 10.12688/openreseurope.16466.2. eCollection 2023.

本文引用的文献

1
Development and Initial Validation of the in-Session Patient Affective Reactions Questionnaire (SPARQ) and the Rift In-Session Questionnaire (RISQ).会话期间患者情感反应问卷(SPARQ)和会话期间裂痕问卷(RISQ)的开发与初步验证。
J Clin Med. 2023 Aug 7;12(15):5156. doi: 10.3390/jcm12155156.
2
Effective patient-physician communication in the era of neuropsychopharmacology.神经精神药理学时代有效的医患沟通。
Eur Neuropsychopharmacol. 2023 Jun;71:1-2. doi: 10.1016/j.euroneuro.2023.02.007. Epub 2023 Mar 1.
3
The alliance in mental health care: conceptualization, evidence and clinical applications.精神卫生保健中的联盟:概念化、证据及临床应用
World Psychiatry. 2023 Feb;22(1):25-41. doi: 10.1002/wps.21035.
4
Therapist reactions to patient personality: A pilot study of clinicians' emotional and neural responses using three clinical vignettes from in treatment series.治疗师对患者个性的反应:一项使用治疗系列中的三个临床案例对临床医生的情绪和神经反应进行的初步研究。
Front Hum Neurosci. 2022 Nov 28;16:1037486. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2022.1037486. eCollection 2022.
5
Clinicians' Emotional Reactions toward Patients with Depressive Symptoms in Mood Disorders: A Narrative Scoping Review of Empirical Research.心境障碍中抑郁症状患者的临床医生情绪反应:对实证研究的叙事范围综述。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Nov 21;19(22):15403. doi: 10.3390/ijerph192215403.
6
Managing Transference and Countertransference in Cognitive Behavioral Supervision: Theoretical Framework and Clinical Application.认知行为督导中移情与反移情的管理:理论框架与临床应用
Psychol Res Behav Manag. 2022 Aug 11;15:2129-2155. doi: 10.2147/PRBM.S369294. eCollection 2022.
7
Therapist emotion and emotional change with clients: Effects on perceived empathy and session quality.治疗师的情绪以及与来访者之间的情绪变化:对感知到的共情和治疗环节质量的影响。
Psychotherapy (Chic). 2022 Dec;59(4):594-605. doi: 10.1037/pst0000442. Epub 2022 Jun 30.
8
Countertransference awareness and treatment outcome.反移情意识与治疗结果。
J Couns Psychol. 2022 Oct;69(5):667-677. doi: 10.1037/cou0000620. Epub 2022 May 12.
9
Empirical support for the use and further study of the countertransference construct in the clinical care of patients with bipolar disorder.对在双相情感障碍患者临床护理中使用反移情概念并进行进一步研究的实证支持。
Bipolar Disord. 2022 Feb;24(1):84-85. doi: 10.1111/bdi.13153. Epub 2021 Nov 17.
10
Examining therapist effects in the alliance-outcome relationship: A multilevel meta-analysis.考察联盟-结果关系中的治疗师效应:一项多层次元分析。
J Consult Clin Psychol. 2021 May;89(5):371-378. doi: 10.1037/ccp0000637. Epub 2021 Apr 8.