• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

会话期间患者情感反应问卷(SPARQ)和会话期间裂痕问卷(RISQ)的开发与初步验证。

Development and Initial Validation of the in-Session Patient Affective Reactions Questionnaire (SPARQ) and the Rift In-Session Questionnaire (RISQ).

作者信息

Stefana Alberto, Langfus Joshua A, Vieta Eduard, Fusar-Poli Paolo, Youngstrom Eric A

机构信息

Department of Brain and Behavioral Sciences, University of Pavia, 27100 Pavia, Italy.

Department of Psychology and Neuroscience, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, USA.

出版信息

J Clin Med. 2023 Aug 7;12(15):5156. doi: 10.3390/jcm12155156.

DOI:10.3390/jcm12155156
PMID:37568559
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10420232/
Abstract

This article discusses the development and preliminary validation of a self-report inventory of the patient's perception of, and affective reaction to, their therapist during a psychotherapy session. First, we wrote a pool of 131 items, reviewed them based on subject matter experts' review, and then collected validation data from a clinical sample of adult patients in individual therapy ( = 701). We used exploratory factor analysis and item response theory graded response models to select items, confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) to test the factor structure, and -fold cross-validation to verify model robustness. Multi-group CFA examined measurement invariance across patients with different diagnoses (unipolar depression, bipolar disorder, and neither of these). Three factors produced short scales retaining the strongest items. The in-Session Patient Affective Reactions Questionnaire (SPARQ) has a two-factor structure, yielding a four-item Negative affect scale and a four-item Positive affect scale. The Relationship In-Session Questionnaire (RISQ) is composed of four items from the third factor with dichotomized responses. Both scales showed excellent psychometric properties and evidence of metric invariance across the three diagnostic groups: unipolar depression, bipolar disorder, and neither of these. The SPARQ and the RISQ scale can be used in clinical or research settings, with particular value for capturing the patient's perspectives about their therapist and session-level emotional processes.

摘要

本文讨论了一种自我报告量表的开发及初步验证,该量表用于评估患者在心理治疗过程中对治疗师的感知及情感反应。首先,我们编写了131个条目组成的条目池,基于主题专家的评审进行了审查,然后从个体治疗中的成年患者临床样本( = 701)中收集了验证数据。我们使用探索性因素分析和项目反应理论等级反应模型来选择条目,验证性因素分析(CFA)来检验因素结构,并采用k折交叉验证来验证模型的稳健性。多组CFA检验了不同诊断患者(单相抑郁、双相情感障碍以及两者都不是)之间的测量不变性。三个因素产生了保留最强条目的简短量表。治疗中患者情感反应问卷(SPARQ)具有双因素结构,产生了一个包含四个条目的负性情感量表和一个包含四个条目的正性情感量表。治疗中关系问卷(RISQ)由第三个因素中的四个条目组成,回答采用二分法。两个量表均显示出优异的心理测量特性以及在单相抑郁、双相情感障碍和两者都不是这三个诊断组之间的度量不变性证据。SPARQ和RISQ量表可用于临床或研究环境,对于捕捉患者对其治疗师的看法以及治疗期间的情感过程具有特殊价值。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a7b0/10420232/ab6dd517d288/jcm-12-05156-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a7b0/10420232/7beeceee01fb/jcm-12-05156-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a7b0/10420232/ab6dd517d288/jcm-12-05156-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a7b0/10420232/7beeceee01fb/jcm-12-05156-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a7b0/10420232/ab6dd517d288/jcm-12-05156-g002.jpg

相似文献

1
Development and Initial Validation of the in-Session Patient Affective Reactions Questionnaire (SPARQ) and the Rift In-Session Questionnaire (RISQ).会话期间患者情感反应问卷(SPARQ)和会话期间裂痕问卷(RISQ)的开发与初步验证。
J Clin Med. 2023 Aug 7;12(15):5156. doi: 10.3390/jcm12155156.
2
Assessing the patient's affective perception of their psychotherapist: validation of the .评估患者对其心理治疗师的情感认知:对……的验证
Front Psychiatry. 2024 Apr 24;15:1346760. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2024.1346760. eCollection 2024.
3
Development and preliminary validation of the Clinician Affective REsponse (CARE) scale.临床医生情感反应(CARE)量表的编制与初步验证
Res Psychother. 2024 Mar 21;27(1):736. doi: 10.4081/ripppo.2024.736.
4
Refinement and Validation of the Social Participation Restrictions Questionnaire: An Application of Rasch Analysis and Traditional Psychometric Analysis Techniques.社会参与限制问卷的细化和验证:Rasch 分析和传统心理测量分析技术的应用。
Ear Hear. 2019 Mar/Apr;40(2):328-339. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0000000000000618.
5
The Chinese version of the Perceived Stress Questionnaire: development and validation amongst medical students and workers.中文版的感知压力问卷:医学生和医务人员的编制与验证。
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2020 Mar 13;18(1):70. doi: 10.1186/s12955-020-01307-1.
6
Psychometric properties of the International Trauma Questionnaire (ITQ) examined in a Norwegian trauma-exposed clinical sample.在挪威遭受创伤的临床样本中对国际创伤问卷(ITQ)的心理测量特性进行了检验。
Eur J Psychotraumatol. 2020 Aug 14;11(1):1796187. doi: 10.1080/20008198.2020.1796187.
7
The Four-Dimensional Symptom Questionnaire (4DSQ) in the general population: scale structure, reliability, measurement invariance and normative data: a cross-sectional survey.一般人群中的四维症状问卷(4DSQ):量表结构、信度、测量不变性及常模数据:一项横断面调查
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2016 Sep 15;14(1):130. doi: 10.1186/s12955-016-0533-4.
8
The Swedish version of the Insomnia Severity Index: Factor structure analysis and psychometric properties in chronic pain patients.失眠严重程度指数瑞典语版本:慢性疼痛患者的因子结构分析及心理测量学特性
Scand J Pain. 2015 Oct 1;9(1):22-27. doi: 10.1016/j.sjpain.2015.06.001.
9
Session Reactions Scale-3: Initial psychometric evidence.会话反应量表-3:初步心理测量证据。
Psychother Res. 2024 Apr;34(4):434-448. doi: 10.1080/10503307.2023.2241983. Epub 2023 Aug 7.
10
The individual therapy process questionnaire: development and validation of a revised measure to evaluate general change mechanisms in psychotherapy.个体治疗过程问卷:一种用于评估心理治疗中一般改变机制的修订量表的开发与验证
Clin Psychol Psychother. 2015 Jul-Aug;22(4):328-45. doi: 10.1002/cpp.1892. Epub 2014 Mar 6.

引用本文的文献

1
Transference Assessment in Psychotherapy: A Systematic Review.心理治疗中的移情评估:一项系统综述。
Clin Psychol Psychother. 2025 Jul-Aug;32(4):e70118. doi: 10.1002/cpp.70118.
2
Evaluating the psychometric properties of the 24-item and 12-item real relationship inventory-client forms.评估24项和12项真实关系量表-客户版的心理测量特性。
PLoS One. 2025 Mar 3;20(3):e0311411. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0311411. eCollection 2025.
3
Psychological, psychiatric, and behavioral sciences measurement scales: best practice guidelines for their development and validation.

本文引用的文献

1
The alliance in mental health care: conceptualization, evidence and clinical applications.精神卫生保健中的联盟:概念化、证据及临床应用
World Psychiatry. 2023 Feb;22(1):25-41. doi: 10.1002/wps.21035.
2
Clinicians' Emotional Reactions toward Patients with Depressive Symptoms in Mood Disorders: A Narrative Scoping Review of Empirical Research.心境障碍中抑郁症状患者的临床医生情绪反应:对实证研究的叙事范围综述。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Nov 21;19(22):15403. doi: 10.3390/ijerph192215403.
3
Mood-congruent memory revisited.再探心境一致性记忆。
心理、精神和行为科学测量量表:其编制与验证的最佳实践指南
Front Psychol. 2025 Jan 23;15:1494261. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1494261. eCollection 2024.
4
Sexual Feelings in the Psychotherapy Room: Comparing Their Occurrence in Patients With Unipolar Depression, Bipolar Disorder, and Neither of These.心理治疗室中的性感受:比较单相抑郁症患者、双相情感障碍患者及两者均无的患者中性感受的发生情况。
Bipolar Disord. 2025 Feb;27(1):69-71. doi: 10.1111/bdi.13511. Epub 2024 Dec 20.
5
Effectiveness of a Novel Web-Based Intervention to Enhance Therapeutic Relationships and Treatment Outcomes in Adult Individual Psychotherapy: Randomized Controlled Trial and Analysis of Predictors of Dropouts.新型基于网络的干预措施对增强成人个体心理治疗中治疗关系和治疗效果的有效性:随机对照试验和辍学预测因素分析。
JMIR Ment Health. 2024 Nov 27;11:e63234. doi: 10.2196/63234.
6
Patients' perspective on the therapeutic relationship and session quality: the central role of alliance.患者对治疗关系和治疗环节质量的看法:联盟的核心作用。
Front Psychol. 2024 Aug 12;15:1367516. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1367516. eCollection 2024.
7
Therapeutic relationship elements and therapy session outcomes: Protocol for a longitudinal study of the patient's perspective.治疗关系要素与治疗 session 结果:一项从患者角度进行纵向研究的方案
Open Res Eur. 2024 Jun 4;3:133. doi: 10.12688/openreseurope.16466.2. eCollection 2023.
8
Assessing the patient's affective perception of their psychotherapist: validation of the .评估患者对其心理治疗师的情感认知:对……的验证
Front Psychiatry. 2024 Apr 24;15:1346760. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2024.1346760. eCollection 2024.
9
Enhancing Psychotherapy Outcomes by Encouraging Patients to Regularly Self-Monitor, Reflect on, and Share Their Affective Responses Toward Their Therapist: Protocol for a Randomized Controlled Trial.通过鼓励患者定期自我监测、反思并分享他们对治疗师的情感反应来提高心理治疗效果:一项随机对照试验方案
JMIR Res Protoc. 2024 Apr 8;13:e55369. doi: 10.2196/55369.
10
Development and preliminary validation of the Clinician Affective REsponse (CARE) scale.临床医生情感反应(CARE)量表的编制与初步验证
Res Psychother. 2024 Mar 21;27(1):736. doi: 10.4081/ripppo.2024.736.
Psychol Rev. 2023 Nov;130(6):1421-1456. doi: 10.1037/rev0000394. Epub 2022 Oct 6.
4
Managing Transference and Countertransference in Cognitive Behavioral Supervision: Theoretical Framework and Clinical Application.认知行为督导中移情与反移情的管理:理论框架与临床应用
Psychol Res Behav Manag. 2022 Aug 11;15:2129-2155. doi: 10.2147/PRBM.S369294. eCollection 2022.
5
Racker and Heimann on Countertransference: Similarities and Differences.拉科和海曼论反移情:相似与不同。
Psychoanal Q. 2021;90(1):105-137. doi: 10.1080/00332828.2021.1851136.
6
Minding my brain: Fourteen neuroscience-based principles to enhance psychotherapy responsiveness.关注大脑:增强心理治疗反应性的 14 项基于神经科学的原则。
Clin Psychol Psychother. 2022 Jul;29(4):1254-1275. doi: 10.1002/cpp.2719. Epub 2022 Mar 7.
7
The first experimental study of transference work-in teenagers (FEST-IT): a multicentre, observer- and patient-blind, randomised controlled component study.转移工作在青少年中首次实验研究(FEST-IT):一项多中心、观察者和患者双盲、随机对照组分研究。
BMC Psychiatry. 2021 Feb 17;21(1):106. doi: 10.1186/s12888-021-03055-y.
8
Fundamental frequency during cognitive preparation and its impact on therapy outcome for panic disorder with Agoraphobia.伴有广场恐惧症的惊恐障碍患者认知准备阶段的基频及其对治疗结果的影响。
Behav Res Ther. 2020 Dec;135:103728. doi: 10.1016/j.brat.2020.103728. Epub 2020 Sep 16.
9
The sister concepts of the working alliance and the real relationship: on their development, rupture, and repair.工作同盟与真实关系的姊妹概念:论其发展、破裂与修复
Res Psychother. 2019 Jul 30;22(2):373. doi: 10.4081/ripppo.2019.373. eCollection 2019 Aug 9.
10
Patient personality and psychotherapist reactions in individual psychotherapy setting: a systematic review.患者人格与个体心理治疗环境中的心理治疗师反应:系统综述。
Clin Psychol Psychother. 2020 Sep;27(5):697-713. doi: 10.1002/cpp.2455. Epub 2020 Apr 17.