Suppr超能文献

评估库蚊收集方法在布基纳法索疟疾合并淋巴丝虫病情况下的外来监测。

Assessment of Culicidae collection methods for xenomonitoring lymphatic filariasis in malaria co-infection context in Burkina Faso.

机构信息

Institut de Recherche en Sciences de la Santé (IRSS), Bobo-Dioulasso, Burkina Faso.

Université Nazi Boni, Bobo-Dioulasso, Burkina Faso.

出版信息

PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2024 Mar 29;18(3):e0012021. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0012021. eCollection 2024 Mar.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Entomological surveillance of lymphatic filariasis and malaria infections play an important role in the decision-making of national programs to control, or eliminate these both diseases. In areas where both diseases prevalence is low, a large number of mosquitoes need to be sampled to determine vectors infection rate. To do this, efficient mosquito collection methods must be used. This study is part in this framework, to assess appropriate mosquito collection methods for lymphatic filariasis xenomonitoring in a coexistence context with malaria in Burkina Faso.

METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: Mosquito collections were performed between August and September 2018 in four villages (Koulpissi, Seiga, and Péribgan, Saptan), distributed in East and South-West health regions of Burkina Faso. Different collection methods were used: Human Landing Catches (HLC) executed indoor and outdoor, Window Exit-Trap, Double Net Trap (DNT) and Pyrethrum Spray Catches (PSC). Molecular analyses were performed to identify Anopheles gambiae s.l. sibling species and to detect Wuchereria bancrofti and Plasmodium falciparum infection in Anopheles mosquitoes. A total of 3 322 mosquitoes were collected among this, Anopheles gambiae s.l. was the vector caught in largest proportion (63.82%). An. gambiae s.l. sibling species molecular characterization showed that An. gambiae was the dominant specie in all villages. The Human Landing Catches (indoor and outdoor) collected the highest proportion of mosquitoes (between 61.5% and 82.79%). For the sampling vectors infected to W. bancrofti or P. falciparum, PSC, HLC and Window Exit-Trap were found the most effective collection methods.

CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE: This study revealed that HLC indoor and outdoor remained the most effective collection method. Likewise, the results showed the probability to use Window Exit-Trap and PSC collection methods to sample Anopheles infected.

摘要

背景

淋巴丝虫病和疟疾感染的昆虫学监测在国家控制或消除这两种疾病的规划决策中发挥着重要作用。在这两种疾病流行率较低的地区,需要对大量蚊子进行采样,以确定媒介感染率。为此,必须使用有效的蚊子采集方法。本研究是该框架的一部分,旨在评估在布基纳法索淋巴丝虫病与疟疾共存的情况下,用于淋巴丝虫病外来监测的适当蚊子采集方法。

方法/主要发现:2018 年 8 月至 9 月期间,在布基纳法索东部和西南部卫生区的四个村庄(Koulpissi、Seiga、Péribgan 和 Saptan)进行了蚊子采集。使用了不同的采集方法:室内和室外的人诱捕、窗出口陷阱、双网陷阱(DNT)和除虫菊酯喷雾捕获。进行分子分析以鉴定冈比亚按蚊属的姐妹种,并检测按蚊中的班氏丝虫和恶性疟原虫感染。共采集了 3322 只蚊子,其中冈比亚按蚊属是捕获的主要媒介(占 63.82%)。冈比亚按蚊属姐妹种的分子特征表明,所有村庄中,冈比亚按蚊都是优势种。人诱捕(室内和室外)采集的蚊子比例最高(61.5%至 82.79%)。对于采样感染班氏丝虫或恶性疟原虫的媒介,发现除虫菊酯喷雾捕获、人诱捕和窗出口陷阱是最有效的采集方法。

结论/意义:本研究表明,室内和室外人诱捕仍然是最有效的采集方法。同样,结果表明,使用窗出口陷阱和除虫菊酯喷雾捕获方法采样感染的按蚊的可能性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2816/11006119/1fd0284f07e6/pntd.0012021.g001.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验