Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative and Pain Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California.
Associate Professor, Department of Medical Education, University of Illinois at Chicago College of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois.
J Surg Educ. 2024 May;81(5):741-752. doi: 10.1016/j.jsurg.2024.02.003. Epub 2024 Mar 28.
The purpose of this qualitative study was to examine responses related to entrustment and feedback comments from an assessment tool.
Qualitative analyses using semi-structured interviews and analysis of narrative comments.
Main hospital OR suite at a large academic medical center.
faculty, and residents who work in the OR suite.
Seven of the 14 theoretical domains from the Theoretical Domains Framework were identified as influencing faculty decision on entrustment: knowledge, skills, intention, memory/attention/decision processes, environmental context, and resources, beliefs of capabilities, and reinforcement. The majority (651/1116 (58.4%)) of faculty comments were critical/modest praise and relevant, consistent across all 6 EPAs. The written in feedback comments for all 1,116 Web App EPA assessments yielded a total of 1,599 sub-competency specific responses. These responses were mapped to core competencies, and at least once to 13 of the 23 ACGME subcompetencies.
Domains identified as influencing faculty decision on entrustment were knowledge, skills, intention, memory/attention/decision processes, environmental context, and resources, beliefs of capabilities, and reinforcement. Most narrative feedback comments were critical/modest praise and relevant, consistent across each of the EPAs.
本定性研究旨在探讨与委托相关的反应以及评估工具的反馈意见。
采用半结构式访谈和叙述性评论分析的定性分析。
大型学术医疗中心的主要医院或套房。
手术室工作的教员和住院医师。
从理论领域框架中确定了七个理论领域影响教员的委托决策:知识、技能、意图、记忆/注意力/决策过程、环境背景和资源、能力信念以及强化。大多数(651/1116(58.4%))教员的评论是关键/适度的表扬,并且与所有 6 个 EPA 都一致。所有 1,116 个 Web App EPA 评估的书面反馈意见共产生了 1,599 个特定于子能力的回复。这些回复被映射到核心能力,并且至少与 ACGME 的 23 个子能力中的 13 个相关。
影响教员委托决策的领域包括知识、技能、意图、记忆/注意力/决策过程、环境背景和资源、能力信念以及强化。大多数叙述性反馈意见是关键/适度的表扬,并且与每个 EPA 都一致。