• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

军民合作质量改进计划概念:一个改善数据收集和结果评估的过程。

The Military-Civilian Partnership Quality Improvement Program Concept: A Process to Improve Data Collection and Outcomes Assessment.

机构信息

88th Medical Group, Wright Patterson Medical Center, Wright Patterson AFB, OH 45433, USA.

Department of Surgery, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Bethesda, MD 20814, USA.

出版信息

Mil Med. 2024 Nov 5;189(11-12):e2307-e2313. doi: 10.1093/milmed/usae117.

DOI:10.1093/milmed/usae117
PMID:38554269
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Military-Civilian Partnerships (MCPs) are vital for maintaining the deployment readiness of military health care physicians. However, tracking their clinical activity has proven to be challenging. In this study, we introduce a locally driven process aimed at the passive collection of external clinical workload data. This process is designed to facilitate an assessment of MCP physicians' deployment readiness and the effectiveness of individual MCPs.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

From March 2020 to February 2023, we conducted a series of quality improvement projects at the Wright Patterson Medical Center (WPMC) to enhance our data collection efforts for MCP physicians. Our methodology encompassed several steps. First, we assessed our existing data collection processes and their outcomes to identify improvement areas. Next, we tested various data collection methods, including self-reporting, a web-based smart phone application, and an automated process based on billing or electronic health record data. Following this, we refined our data collection process, incorporating the identified improvements and systematically tracking outcomes. Finally, we evaluated the refined process in 2 different MCPs, with our primary outcome measure being the collection of monthly health care data.

RESULTS

Our examination at the WPMC initially identified several weaknesses in our established data collection efforts. These included unclear responsibility for data collection within the Medical Group, an inadequate roster of participating MCP physicians, and underutilization of military and community resources for data collection. To address these issues, we implemented revisions to our data collection process. These revisions included establishing clear responsibility for data collection through the Office of Military-Civilian Partnerships, introducing a regular "roll call" to match physicians to MCP agreements, passively collecting data each month through civilian partner billing or information technology offices, and integrating Office of Military-Civilian Partnership efforts into regular executive committee meetings. As a result, we observed a 4-fold increase in monthly data capture at WPMC, with similar gains when the refined process was implemented at an Air Force Center for the Sustainment of Trauma and Readiness Skills site.

CONCLUSIONS

The Military-Civilian Partnership Quality Improvement Program concept is an effective, locally driven process for enhancing the capture of external clinical workload data for military providers engaged in MCPs. Further examination of the Military-Civilian Partnership Quality Improvement Program process is needed at other institutions to validate its effectiveness and build a community of MCP champions.

摘要

简介

军民伙伴关系(MCPs)对于维持军事医疗保健医生的部署准备至关重要。然而,事实证明,跟踪他们的临床活动具有挑战性。在这项研究中,我们引入了一个本地驱动的流程,旨在被动收集外部临床工作量数据。该流程旨在评估 MCP 医生的部署准备情况和各个 MCP 的有效性。

材料和方法

从 2020 年 3 月到 2023 年 2 月,我们在莱特·帕特森医疗中心(WPMC)进行了一系列质量改进项目,以加强我们对 MCP 医生的数据收集工作。我们的方法包括几个步骤。首先,我们评估了现有的数据收集流程及其结果,以确定改进领域。接下来,我们测试了各种数据收集方法,包括自我报告、基于智能手机的网络应用程序以及基于计费或电子健康记录数据的自动流程。之后,我们改进了我们的数据收集流程,纳入了确定的改进措施,并系统地跟踪结果。最后,我们在两个不同的 MCP 中评估了改进后的流程,主要结果衡量标准是每月医疗保健数据的收集。

结果

我们在 WPMC 的检查最初确定了我们既定数据收集工作中的几个弱点。这些弱点包括医疗集团内数据收集责任不明确、参与 MCP 的医生名册不足以及军事和社区资源在数据收集方面的利用不足。为了解决这些问题,我们对数据收集流程进行了修订。这些修订包括通过军民伙伴关系办公室明确数据收集责任、定期进行“点名”以将医生与 MCP 协议匹配、每月通过民用合作伙伴计费或信息技术办公室被动收集数据,以及将军民伙伴关系工作纳入常规执行委员会会议。结果,我们观察到 WPMC 的每月数据捕获量增加了 4 倍,在空军维持创伤和准备技能中心实施改进后的流程时也取得了类似的收益。

结论

军民伙伴关系质量改进计划概念是一种有效的、本地驱动的流程,用于增强参与 MCP 的军事提供者的外部临床工作量数据的捕获。需要在其他机构进一步检查军民伙伴关系质量改进计划流程,以验证其有效性并建立 MCP 冠军社区。

相似文献

1
The Military-Civilian Partnership Quality Improvement Program Concept: A Process to Improve Data Collection and Outcomes Assessment.军民合作质量改进计划概念:一个改善数据收集和结果评估的过程。
Mil Med. 2024 Nov 5;189(11-12):e2307-e2313. doi: 10.1093/milmed/usae117.
2
Data-driven readiness: A preliminary report on cataloging best practices in military civilian partnerships.数据驱动的准备情况:关于梳理军民伙伴关系最佳实践的初步报告
J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2022 Aug 1;93(2S Suppl 1):S155-S159. doi: 10.1097/TA.0000000000003694. Epub 2022 May 23.
3
Quality of Integration of Air Force Trauma Surgeons Within the Center for Sustainment of Trauma and Readiness Skills, Cincinnati: A Pilot Study.空军创伤外科医生在辛辛那提创伤与准备技能维持中心的整合质量:一项试点研究。
Mil Med. 2024 Aug 30;189(9-10):2100-2106. doi: 10.1093/milmed/usad441.
4
Military-civilian partnerships and the clinical readiness mission: A preliminary study from the Military Health System and the American College of Surgeons.军民合作与临床战备任务:来自军事卫生系统和美国外科医师学会的一项初步研究。
J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2022 Aug 1;93(2S Suppl 1):S16-S21. doi: 10.1097/TA.0000000000003704. Epub 2022 May 18.
5
Initial Assessment of a Regional Military-Civilian Partnership on Trauma Surgery Skills Sustainment.创伤外科技能维持的区域性军民合作初步评估。
Mil Med. 2023 Jul 22;188(7-8):e2462-e2466. doi: 10.1093/milmed/usac229.
6
The Las Vegas military-civilian partnership: An origin story and call to action.拉斯维加斯军民伙伴关系:起源故事与行动呼吁。
J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2022 Aug 1;93(2S Suppl 1):S169-S173. doi: 10.1097/TA.0000000000003701. Epub 2022 May 23.
7
Military-Civilian Partnership to Improve Combat Casualty Care Readiness Among Non-physician Providers.军民合作以提高非医师医疗人员的战斗伤亡护理准备水平。
Mil Med. 2025 Feb 27;190(3-4):817-822. doi: 10.1093/milmed/usae425.
8
Using a Military-Civilian Partnership to Enhance Clinical Readiness and Sustainment for Air Force Critical Care Nurses.利用军民伙伴关系增强空军重症监护护士的临床准备和维持能力。
Crit Care Nurse. 2024 Oct 1;44(5):13-19. doi: 10.4037/ccn2024428.
9
Optimizing combat readiness for military surgeons without trauma fellowship training: Engaging the "voluntary faculty" model.优化无创伤专科培训的军事外科医生的战备能力:采用“志愿教员”模式。
J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2023 Aug 1;95(2S Suppl 1):S31-S35. doi: 10.1097/TA.0000000000004040. Epub 2023 May 15.
10
Trauma surgical skill sustainment at the University of Chicago AMEDD Military-Civilian Trauma Team Training Site: an observation report.芝加哥大学美国陆军医疗部军事-民用创伤团队训练基地的创伤外科技能维持:一份观察报告。
Trauma Surg Acute Care Open. 2024 Jan 24;9(1):e001177. doi: 10.1136/tsaco-2023-001177. eCollection 2024.