Suppr超能文献

数字疗法保险覆盖范围的洞察:对美国支付方观点的定性研究。

Insights into insurance coverage for digital therapeutics: A qualitative study of US payer perspectives.

机构信息

Department of Pharmacotherapy, College of Pharmacy, University of Utah, Salt Lake City.

Center for Health Outcomes and PharmacoEconomic Research, College of Pharmacy, The University of Arizona, Tucson.

出版信息

J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2024 Apr;30(4):313-325. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2024.30.4.313.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

In the last decade there has been an increase in the development and marketing of digital therapeutic (DTx) products aiming to prevent, manage, or treat a medical disorder or disease. Health insurance coverage for these products is not well established, and payers are facing increasing pressure to include these products as a covered benefit.

OBJECTIVE

To examine factors and characteristics that could drive health insurance coverage of DTx products from US payers' and coverage decision-makers' perspectives.

METHODS

This was a qualitative noninterventional, cross-sectional study conducted from August 2022 to October 2022. Virtual focus group meetings with pharmacy benefit managers/directors or medical directors representing a range of health insurance organizations were held following a semistructured interview guide. Convenience and snowball sampling techniques were used to identify participants. Transcripts were coded and analyzed with Atlas.ti software to identify common themes and subthemes.

RESULTS

Five focus group meetings and 1 individual interview were held from August to October 2022. Participants (n = 22) were mostly pharmacists (n = 18, 85%) with more than 15 years of experience (n = 18, 85%). Some participants indicated that DTx products for diabetes (n = 6, 29%), mental/behavioral health (n = 3, 14%), and substance abuse disorders (n = 3, 14%) were already covered by their organizations. The topics generating the most comments grouped by code were issues around the evidence for DTx (67 unique comments) and barriers for coverage (60 unique comments). Participants indicated they want to have evidence of effectiveness that is similar to traditional pharmaceutical products. Barriers for coverage included a need to revise benefit policies, exclusion of nonprescription products, and mechanisms for billing. DTx products with an indication for mental/behavioral health were viewed as most likely to be reimbursed. Coverage of DTx products may occur under either the pharmacy or medical benefit.

CONCLUSIONS

Health care payers stated that evidence of effectiveness was a necessary condition for health insurance coverage of DTx products. Given these are relatively new in health care, payers had more questions than answers regarding how these products will be integrated into health benefits.

摘要

背景

在过去十年中,数字治疗(DTx)产品的开发和营销有所增加,旨在预防、管理或治疗医疗障碍或疾病。这些产品的健康保险覆盖范围尚未得到很好的建立,支付方面临着越来越大的压力,要求将这些产品纳入保险范围。

目的

从美国支付方和保险覆盖决策者的角度,研究可能推动 DTx 产品获得健康保险覆盖的因素和特征。

方法

这是一项定性的非干预性、横断面研究,于 2022 年 8 月至 10 月进行。在半结构化访谈指南的指导下,与代表各种健康保险组织的药品福利经理/主任或医疗主任举行了虚拟焦点小组会议。采用便利抽样和滚雪球抽样技术来确定参与者。使用 Atlas.ti 软件对转录本进行编码和分析,以确定共同主题和子主题。

结果

2022 年 8 月至 10 月期间举行了 5 次焦点小组会议和 1 次单独访谈。参与者(n=22)主要是药剂师(n=18,85%),经验超过 15 年(n=18,85%)。一些参与者表示,他们的组织已经覆盖了糖尿病(n=6,29%)、精神/行为健康(n=3,14%)和药物滥用障碍(n=3,14%)的 DTx 产品。生成最多评论的主题按代码分组为 DTx 的证据问题(67 条独特评论)和覆盖障碍(60 条独特评论)。参与者表示,他们希望拥有与传统药物产品类似的有效性证据。覆盖障碍包括需要修订福利政策、排除非处方产品和计费机制。有精神/行为健康适应症的 DTx 产品被认为最有可能获得报销。DTx 产品的覆盖范围可能在药房或医疗福利下进行。

结论

医疗保健支付方表示,有效性证据是 DTx 产品获得健康保险覆盖的必要条件。鉴于这些产品在医疗保健领域相对较新,支付方对于这些产品将如何纳入健康福利存在的问题多于答案。

相似文献

1
Insights into insurance coverage for digital therapeutics: A qualitative study of US payer perspectives.
J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2024 Apr;30(4):313-325. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2024.30.4.313.
2
AMCP Partnership Forum: Digital Therapeutics-What Are They and Where Do They Fit in Pharmacy and Medical Benefits?
J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2020 May;26(5):674-681. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2020.19418. Epub 2020 Mar 16.
4
AMCP Partnership Forum: The evolving role of digital therapeutics.
J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2022 Jul;28(7):804-810. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2022.22093. Epub 2022 Jun 14.
7
Health insurance coverage and switching among people with hemophilia A in the United States.
J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2022 Feb;28(2):232-243. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2021.21311. Epub 2021 Nov 15.
8
Reimbursement of Digital Therapeutics: Future Perspectives in Korea.
Korean Circ J. 2022 Apr;52(4):265-279. doi: 10.4070/kcj.2022.0014.
10
Coverage of Nonpharmacologic Treatments for Low Back Pain Among US Public and Private Insurers.
JAMA Netw Open. 2018 Oct 5;1(6):e183044. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2018.3044.

本文引用的文献

1
FDA regulations and prescription digital therapeutics: Evolving with the technologies they regulate.
Front Digit Health. 2023 Apr 17;5:1086219. doi: 10.3389/fdgth.2023.1086219. eCollection 2023.
2
Digital therapeutics from bench to bedside.
NPJ Digit Med. 2023 Mar 10;6(1):38. doi: 10.1038/s41746-023-00777-z.
3
Open challenges in developing digital therapeutics in the United States.
PLOS Digit Health. 2022 Jan 18;1(1):e0000008. doi: 10.1371/journal.pdig.0000008. eCollection 2022 Jan.
4
Healthcare Systems across Europe and the US: The Managed Entry Agreements Experience.
Healthcare (Basel). 2023 Feb 3;11(3):447. doi: 10.3390/healthcare11030447.
6
Cost-effectiveness of digital therapeutics for essential hypertension.
Hypertens Res. 2022 Oct;45(10):1538-1548. doi: 10.1038/s41440-022-00952-x. Epub 2022 Jun 20.
7
AMCP Partnership Forum: The evolving role of digital therapeutics.
J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2022 Jul;28(7):804-810. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2022.22093. Epub 2022 Jun 14.
8
Digital Therapeutic Device for Urinary Incontinence: A Randomized Controlled Trial.
Obstet Gynecol. 2022 Apr 1;139(4):606-615. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000004725. Epub 2022 Mar 10.
10
Randomized Controlled Trial of a Dichoptic Digital Therapeutic for Amblyopia.
Ophthalmology. 2022 Jan;129(1):77-85. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2021.09.001. Epub 2021 Sep 14.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验