• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

大型医疗保健服务系统中精神健康数字疗法的临床应用:回顾性患者队列研究与提供者调查

Clinical Use of Mental Health Digital Therapeutics in a Large Health Care Delivery System: Retrospective Patient Cohort Study and Provider Survey.

作者信息

Ridout Samuel J, Ridout Kathryn K, Lin Teresa Y, Campbell Cynthia I

机构信息

Department of Psychiatry, San Jose Medical Center, The Permanente Medical Group, San Jose, CA, United States.

Kaiser Permanente Northern California Division of Research, 4480 Hacienda Drive, Pleasanton, CA, 94588, United States, 1 650 380 2507.

出版信息

JMIR Ment Health. 2024 Oct 2;11:e56574. doi: 10.2196/56574.

DOI:10.2196/56574
PMID:39356493
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11463191/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

While the number of digital therapeutics (DTx) has proliferated, there is little real-world research on the characteristics of providers recommending DTx, their recommendation behaviors, or the characteristics of patients receiving recommendations in the clinical setting.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to characterize the clinical and demographic characteristics of patients receiving DTx recommendations and describe provider characteristics and behaviors regarding DTx.

METHODS

This retrospective cohort study used electronic health record data from a large, integrated health care delivery system. Demographic and clinical characteristics of adult patients recommended versus not recommended DTx by a mental health provider between May 2020 and December 2021 were examined. A cross-sectional survey of mental health providers providing these recommendations was conducted in December 2022 to assess the characteristics of providers and recommendation behaviors related to DTx. Parametric and nonparametric tests were used to examine statistical significance between groups.

RESULTS

Of 335,250 patients with a mental health appointment, 53,546 (16%) received a DTx recommendation. Patients recommended to DTx were younger, were of Asian or Hispanic race or ethnicity, were female, were without medical comorbidities, and had commercial insurance compared to those without a DTx recommendation (P<.001). More patients receiving a DTx recommendation had anxiety or adjustment disorder diagnoses, but less had depression, bipolar, or psychotic disorder diagnoses (P<.001) versus matched controls not recommended to DTx. Overall, depression and anxiety symptom scores were lower in patients recommended to DTx compared to matched controls not receiving a recommendation, although female patients had a higher proportion of severe depression and anxiety scores compared to male patients. Provider survey results indicated a higher proportion of nonprescribers recommended DTx to patients compared to prescribers (P=.008). Of all providers, 29.4% (45/153) reported using the suggested internal electronic health record-based tools (eg, smart text) to recommend DTx, and of providers recommending DTx resources to patients, 64.1% (98/153) reported they follow up with patients to inquire on DTx benefits. Only 38.4% (58/151) of respondents report recommending specific DTx modules, and of those, 58.6% (34/58) report following up on the impact of these specific modules.

CONCLUSIONS

DTx use in mental health was modest and varied by patient and provider characteristics. Providers do not appear to actively engage with these tools and integrate them into treatment plans. Providers, while expressing interest in potential benefits from DTx, may view DTx as a passive strategy to augment traditional treatment for select patients.

摘要

背景

虽然数字疗法(DTx)的数量激增,但关于推荐DTx的提供者的特征、他们的推荐行为或在临床环境中接受推荐的患者的特征,几乎没有现实世界的研究。

目的

本研究的目的是描述接受DTx推荐的患者的临床和人口统计学特征,并描述提供者关于DTx的特征和行为。

方法

这项回顾性队列研究使用了来自一个大型综合医疗保健系统的电子健康记录数据。研究了2020年5月至2021年12月期间心理健康提供者推荐与未推荐DTx的成年患者的人口统计学和临床特征。2022年12月对提供这些推荐的心理健康提供者进行了横断面调查,以评估提供者的特征以及与DTx相关的推荐行为。使用参数检验和非参数检验来检验组间的统计学显著性。

结果

在335,250名有心理健康预约的患者中,53,546名(16%)接受了DTx推荐。与未接受DTx推荐的患者相比,被推荐使用DTx的患者更年轻,为亚洲或西班牙裔种族或族裔,为女性,没有合并症,并且拥有商业保险(P<0.0(此处原文有误,推测是P<0.001))。与未被推荐使用DTx的匹配对照组相比,更多接受DTx推荐的患者被诊断为焦虑或适应障碍,但被诊断为抑郁症、双相情感障碍或精神障碍的患者较少(P<0.001)。总体而言,与未接受推荐的匹配对照组相比,被推荐使用DTx的患者的抑郁和焦虑症状评分较低,尽管女性患者中重度抑郁和焦虑评分的比例高于男性患者。提供者调查结果表明,与开处方者相比,非开处方者向患者推荐DTx的比例更高(P = 0.008)。在所有提供者中,29.4%(45/153)报告使用建议的基于电子健康记录的内部工具(如智能文本)来推荐DTx,在向患者推荐DTx资源的提供者中,64.1%(98/153)报告他们会跟进患者以询问DTx的益处。只有38.4%(58/151)的受访者报告推荐了特定的DTx模块,其中58.6%(34/58)报告跟进了这些特定模块的影响。

结论

DTx在心理健康领域的使用较少,且因患者和提供者特征而异。提供者似乎没有积极使用这些工具并将其纳入治疗计划。提供者虽然对DTx的潜在益处表示感兴趣,但可能将DTx视为增强特定患者传统治疗的被动策略。

相似文献

1
Clinical Use of Mental Health Digital Therapeutics in a Large Health Care Delivery System: Retrospective Patient Cohort Study and Provider Survey.大型医疗保健服务系统中精神健康数字疗法的临床应用:回顾性患者队列研究与提供者调查
JMIR Ment Health. 2024 Oct 2;11:e56574. doi: 10.2196/56574.
2
Racial and ethnic differences in perception of provider cultural competence among patients with depression and anxiety symptoms: a retrospective, population-based, cross-sectional analysis.抑郁和焦虑症状患者感知提供者文化能力的种族和民族差异:一项回顾性、基于人群、横断面分析。
Lancet Psychiatry. 2021 Nov;8(11):957-968. doi: 10.1016/S2215-0366(21)00285-6. Epub 2021 Sep 23.
3
Patient and Health Care Professional Perspectives About Referral, Self-Reported Use, and Perceived Importance of Digital Mental Health App Attributes in a Diverse Integrated Health System: Cross-Sectional Survey Study.患者和医疗保健专业人员对转诊、自我报告使用以及多样化综合健康系统中数字心理健康应用属性的重要性看法:横断面调查研究。
JMIR Form Res. 2024 Nov 15;8:e59831. doi: 10.2196/59831.
4
AMCP Partnership Forum: Digital Therapeutics-What Are They and Where Do They Fit in Pharmacy and Medical Benefits?AMCP 合作论坛:数字疗法——它们是什么,以及它们在药学和医疗福利中的定位是什么?
J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2020 May;26(5):674-681. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2020.19418. Epub 2020 Mar 16.
5
Accepting Medication Therapy Management Recommendations to Add ACEIs or ARBs in Diabetes Care.接受药物治疗管理建议以在糖尿病护理中添加ACEI或ARB。
J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2016 Jan;22(1):40-8. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2016.22.1.40.
6
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
7
Examining Whether Patient Portal and Video Visit Use Differs by Race and Ethnicity Among Older Adults in a US Integrated Health Care Delivery System: Cross-Sectional Electronic Health Record and Survey-Based Study.考察在美国一体化医疗服务提供系统中,老年患者使用患者门户和视频访问的情况是否因种族和民族而异:基于电子健康记录和调查的横断面研究。
JMIR Aging. 2024 Nov 7;7:e63814. doi: 10.2196/63814.
8
The Trifecta of Industry, Academic, and Health System Partnership to Improve Mental Health Care Through Smartphone-Based Remote Patient Monitoring: Development and Usability Study.通过基于智能手机的远程患者监测改善精神卫生保健的行业、学术和卫生系统三方合作:开发与可用性研究
JMIR Form Res. 2025 Jan 7;9:e57624. doi: 10.2196/57624.
9
Improvement and Maintenance of Clinical Outcomes in a Digital Mental Health Platform: Findings From a Longitudinal Observational Real-World Study.数字心理健康平台中临床结局的改善和维持:一项纵向观察性真实世界研究的结果。
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2024 Jun 24;12:e48298. doi: 10.2196/48298.
10
Did the Physical and Mental Health of Orthopaedic Patients Change After the Onset of the COVID-19 Pandemic?骨科患者在 COVID-19 大流行开始后身心健康状况是否发生了变化?
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2023 May 1;481(5):935-944. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000002555. Epub 2023 Jan 25.

引用本文的文献

1
Telehealth and Pharmacotherapy: The Role of Synchronous and Novel Asynchronous Digital Health Tools in Psychiatry.远程医疗与药物治疗:同步及新型异步数字健康工具在精神病学中的作用。
Pharmaceut Med. 2025 Aug 25. doi: 10.1007/s40290-025-00579-6.
2
The evolving field of digital mental health: current evidence and implementation issues for smartphone apps, generative artificial intelligence, and virtual reality.数字心理健康的发展领域:智能手机应用程序、生成式人工智能和虚拟现实的当前证据及实施问题
World Psychiatry. 2025 Jun;24(2):156-174. doi: 10.1002/wps.21299.

本文引用的文献

1
Current evidence on the efficacy of mental health smartphone apps for symptoms of depression and anxiety. A meta-analysis of 176 randomized controlled trials.关于心理健康智能手机应用程序对抑郁和焦虑症状疗效的当前证据。对176项随机对照试验的荟萃分析。
World Psychiatry. 2024 Feb;23(1):139-149. doi: 10.1002/wps.21183.
2
Barriers and facilitators to utilizing digital health technologies by healthcare professionals.医疗保健专业人员使用数字健康技术的障碍与促进因素。
NPJ Digit Med. 2023 Sep 18;6(1):161. doi: 10.1038/s41746-023-00899-4.
3
Mapping Factors That Affect the Uptake of Digital Therapeutics Within Health Systems: Scoping Review.映射影响数字疗法在医疗体系内采用的因素:范围综述。
J Med Internet Res. 2023 Jul 25;25:e48000. doi: 10.2196/48000.
4
The Usability, Feasibility, Acceptability, and Efficacy of Digital Mental Health Services in the COVID-19 Pandemic: Scoping Review, Systematic Review, and Meta-analysis.在 COVID-19 大流行期间数字心理健康服务的可用性、可行性、可接受性和疗效:范围综述、系统综述和荟萃分析。
JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2023 Feb 13;9:e43730. doi: 10.2196/43730.
5
Potential and Pitfalls of Mobile Mental Health Apps in Traditional Treatment: An Umbrella Review.移动心理健康应用程序在传统治疗中的潜力与陷阱:一项综述。
J Pers Med. 2022 Aug 25;12(9):1376. doi: 10.3390/jpm12091376.
6
Did Usage of Mental Health Apps Change during COVID-19? A Comparative Study Based on an Objective Recording of Usage Data and Demographics.在新冠疫情期间,心理健康应用程序的使用情况有变化吗?一项基于使用数据和人口统计学客观记录的比较研究。
Life (Basel). 2022 Aug 19;12(8):1266. doi: 10.3390/life12081266.
7
Physicians' Attitudes Toward Prescribable mHealth Apps and Implications for Adoption in Germany: Mixed Methods Study.医生对可开方的移动医疗应用程序的态度及其在德国采用的影响:混合方法研究。
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2021 Nov 23;9(11):e33012. doi: 10.2196/33012.
8
Opportunities to Integrate Mobile App-Based Interventions Into Mental Health and Substance Use Disorder Treatment Services in the Wake of COVID-19.新冠疫情后,将基于移动应用程序的干预措施融入精神健康和物质使用障碍治疗服务中的机会。
Am J Health Promot. 2021 Nov;35(8):1178-1183. doi: 10.1177/08901171211055314. Epub 2021 Oct 15.
9
The Acceptability and Usability of Digital Health Interventions for Adults With Depression, Anxiety, and Somatoform Disorders: Qualitative Systematic Review and Meta-Synthesis.针对患有抑郁症、焦虑症和躯体形式障碍的成年人的数字健康干预措施的可接受性和可用性:定性系统评价与元综合分析
J Med Internet Res. 2020 Jul 6;22(7):e16228. doi: 10.2196/16228.
10
Physician attitudes towards-and adoption of-mobile health.医生对移动医疗的态度及采用情况
Digit Health. 2020 Feb 20;6:2055207620907187. doi: 10.1177/2055207620907187. eCollection 2020 Jan-Dec.