• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

四个国家数字疗法的获批趋势和产品特点。

Approved trends and product characteristics of digital therapeutics in four countries.

作者信息

Liang Jun, Fang Qichuan, Jiao Xiaoyi, Xiang Peng, Ma Junhao, Zhang Zijiao, Liu Yongcheng, He Yunfan, Li Yingjun, He Zhixu, Lei Jianbo

机构信息

Department of AI and IT, Second Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China.

School of Medical Technology and Information Engineering, Zhejiang Chinese Medical University, Hangzhou, China.

出版信息

NPJ Digit Med. 2025 May 26;8(1):308. doi: 10.1038/s41746-025-01660-9.

DOI:10.1038/s41746-025-01660-9
PMID:40419648
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12106666/
Abstract

Digital therapeutics (DTx) provide innovative treatment options. In this study, we identified and compared approved DTx in China, the US, Germany, and Belgium. In total, 507 DTx applications were identified (US, 192; China, 235; Germany, 55; Belgium, 25). China has approved the most, whereas the US initiated approval as early as 2017. In China, most DTx applications focus on disease treatment (88.09%), particularly for neurological (45.96%) and ophthalmic (21.28%) diseases. The US and Belgium emphasize disease management (US: 52.60%, Belgium: 72.00%), whereas Germany focuses on the treatment of mental and behavioral disorders (47.27%). Regarding therapeutic approaches, China's DTx predominantly utilizes computerized cognitive correction (26.38%), whereas the US and Belgium primarily rely on health status monitoring (US, 44.27%; Belgium, 80.00%). Germany's DTx primarily employs cognitive behavioral therapy (69.09%). An online database was established to ensure ease of access. Future studies should focus on generating further evidence to support the broader adoption of DTx.

摘要

数字疗法(DTx)提供了创新的治疗选择。在本研究中,我们识别并比较了中国、美国、德国和比利时已获批的数字疗法。总共识别出507个数字疗法应用(美国192个;中国235个;德国55个;比利时25个)。中国获批的数字疗法最多,而美国早在2017年就开始批准。在中国,大多数数字疗法应用专注于疾病治疗(88.09%),尤其是神经系统疾病(45.96%)和眼科疾病(21.28%)。美国和比利时强调疾病管理(美国:52.60%,比利时:72.00%),而德国则专注于精神和行为障碍的治疗(47.27%)。在治疗方法方面,中国的数字疗法主要采用计算机化认知矫正(26.38%),而美国和比利时主要依赖健康状况监测(美国,44.27%;比利时,80.00%)。德国的数字疗法主要采用认知行为疗法(69.09%)。建立了一个在线数据库以确保易于访问。未来的研究应专注于生成更多证据以支持数字疗法的更广泛应用。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/441d/12106666/c24e07ba459f/41746_2025_1660_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/441d/12106666/e9e3706905c5/41746_2025_1660_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/441d/12106666/6b62fb834af1/41746_2025_1660_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/441d/12106666/87db9b98ec62/41746_2025_1660_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/441d/12106666/30007d6cd3d2/41746_2025_1660_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/441d/12106666/c24e07ba459f/41746_2025_1660_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/441d/12106666/e9e3706905c5/41746_2025_1660_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/441d/12106666/6b62fb834af1/41746_2025_1660_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/441d/12106666/87db9b98ec62/41746_2025_1660_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/441d/12106666/30007d6cd3d2/41746_2025_1660_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/441d/12106666/c24e07ba459f/41746_2025_1660_Fig5_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Approved trends and product characteristics of digital therapeutics in four countries.四个国家数字疗法的获批趋势和产品特点。
NPJ Digit Med. 2025 May 26;8(1):308. doi: 10.1038/s41746-025-01660-9.
2
Digital Therapeutics in China: Comprehensive Review.中国的数字疗法:全面综述
J Med Internet Res. 2025 May 27;27:e70955. doi: 10.2196/70955.
3
Access and reimbursement pathways for digital health solutions and diagnostic devices: Current scenario and challenges.数字健康解决方案和诊断设备的准入与报销途径:现状与挑战
Front Med Technol. 2023 Feb 20;5:1101476. doi: 10.3389/fmedt.2023.1101476. eCollection 2023.
4
Success Factors for Scaling Up the Adoption of Digital Therapeutics Towards the Realization of P5 Medicine.扩大数字疗法采用以实现P5医学的成功因素
Front Med (Lausanne). 2022 Apr 12;9:854665. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2022.854665. eCollection 2022.
5
From awareness to integration: a qualitative interview study on the impact of digital therapeutics on physicians' practices in Germany.从认知到整合:关于数字疗法对德国医生医疗实践影响的定性访谈研究
BMC Health Serv Res. 2025 Apr 18;25(1):568. doi: 10.1186/s12913-025-12656-2.
6
A comprehensive survey of the clinical trial Landscape on digital therapeutics.关于数字疗法临床试验现状的全面调查。
Heliyon. 2024 Aug 10;10(16):e36115. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e36115. eCollection 2024 Aug 30.
7
Adoption of Digital Therapeutics in Europe.数字疗法在欧洲的应用。
Ther Clin Risk Manag. 2024 Dec 27;20:939-954. doi: 10.2147/TCRM.S489873. eCollection 2024.
8
Comparison of health technology assessments for digital therapeutics in Germany, the United Kingdom and France.德国、英国和法国数字疗法的卫生技术评估比较。
Digit Health. 2025 Jan 22;11:20552076241308704. doi: 10.1177/20552076241308704. eCollection 2025 Jan-Dec.
9
Challenges With the Use of Digital Sham: Systematic Review and Recommendations.使用数字假手的挑战:系统评价与建议。
J Med Internet Res. 2023 Oct 24;25:e44764. doi: 10.2196/44764.
10
Digital therapeutics in Japan: Present and future directions.日本的数字疗法:现状与未来方向。
J Cardiol. 2025 May;85(5):360-365. doi: 10.1016/j.jjcc.2024.11.005. Epub 2024 Nov 28.

本文引用的文献

1
Benchmarking the clinical outcomes of Healthentia SaMD in chronic disease management: a systematic literature review comparison.比较Healthentia软件即服务(SaMD)在慢性病管理中的临床结果:一项系统文献综述
Front Public Health. 2024 Dec 24;12:1488687. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1488687. eCollection 2024.
2
Adoption of Digital Therapeutics in Europe.数字疗法在欧洲的应用。
Ther Clin Risk Manag. 2024 Dec 27;20:939-954. doi: 10.2147/TCRM.S489873. eCollection 2024.
3
Mapping the Evidence Supporting Digital Therapeutics: A Review.
绘制支持数字疗法的证据图谱:一项综述
JAMA Intern Med. 2024 Nov 1;184(11):1388-1390. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2024.4972.
4
Exploring the potential of digital therapeutics: An assessment of progress and promise.探索数字疗法的潜力:对进展与前景的评估。
Digit Health. 2024 Sep 12;10:20552076241277441. doi: 10.1177/20552076241277441. eCollection 2024 Jan-Dec.
5
Digital therapeutics in hypertension: How to make sustainable lifestyle changes.高血压的数字化治疗:如何实现可持续的生活方式改变。
J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich). 2024 Oct;26(10):1125-1132. doi: 10.1111/jch.14894. Epub 2024 Sep 9.
6
Establishing an Evaluation Indicator System for User Satisfaction With Hypertension Management Apps: Combining User-Generated Content and Analytic Hierarchy Process.建立高血压管理应用用户满意度评估指标体系:结合用户生成内容和层次分析法。
J Med Internet Res. 2024 Sep 3;26:e60773. doi: 10.2196/60773.
7
Understanding patient perspectives on digital therapeutics and its platform for insomnia: insights from focused group interviews.理解患者对数字治疗及其失眠平台的看法:来自焦点小组访谈的见解。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2024 Jul 29;24(1):859. doi: 10.1186/s12913-024-11286-4.
8
Digital therapeutics as an emerging new therapy for diabetes mellitus: potentials and concerns.数字疗法作为糖尿病的一种新兴治疗方法:潜力与担忧。
Endocr Connect. 2024 Jul 1;13(9). doi: 10.1530/EC-24-0219.
9
The three-year evolution of Germany's Digital Therapeutics reimbursement program and its path forward.德国数字疗法报销计划的三年演变及其未来发展道路。
NPJ Digit Med. 2024 May 24;7(1):139. doi: 10.1038/s41746-024-01137-1.
10
Therapies go digital. What drives physicians' acceptance?疗法走向数字化。是什么推动了医生的接受度?
PLoS One. 2024 May 10;19(5):e0303302. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0303302. eCollection 2024.