Qin Mingsheng, Zeng Ziqi, Cheng Shijie, Xie Jia
State Key Laboratory of Advanced Electromagnetic Technology, School of Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430074, Hubei, P. R. China.
State Key Laboratory of Materials Processing and Die & Mould Technology, School of Materials Science and Engineering, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430074, Hubei P. R. China.
Acc Chem Res. 2024 Apr 16;57(8):1163-1173. doi: 10.1021/acs.accounts.4c00022. Epub 2024 Apr 1.
ConspectusSince their commercialization in the 1990s, lithium-ion batteries (LIBs) have been increasingly used in applications such as portable electronics, electric vehicles, and large-scale energy storage. The increasing use of LIBs in modern society has necessitated superior-performance LIB development, including electrochemical reversibility, interfacial stability, efficient kinetics, environmental adaptability, and intrinsic safety, which is difficult to simultaneously achieve in commercialized electrolytes. Current electrolyte systems contain a solution with Li salts (e.g., LiPF) and solvents (e.g., ethylene carbonate and dimethyl carbonate), in which the latter dissolves Li salts and strongly interacts with Li (lithiophilic feature). Only lithiophilic agents can be functionally modified (e.g., additives and solvents), altering the bulk and interfacial behaviors of Li solvates. However, such approaches alter pristine Li solvation and electrochemical processes, making it difficult to strike a balance between the electrochemical performance and other desired electrolyte functions. This common electrolyte design in lithiophilic solvents shows strong coupling among formulation, coordination, electrochemistry, and electrolyte function. The invention of lithiophobic cosolvents (e.g., multifluorinated ether and fluoroaromatic hydrocarbons) has expanded the electrolyte design space to lithiophilic (interacts with Li) and lithiophobic (interacts with solvents but not with Li) dimensions. Functional modifications switch to lithiophobic cosolvents, affording superior properties (carried by lithiophobic cosolvents) with little impact on primary Li solvation (dictated by lithiophilic solvents). This electrolyte engineering technique based on lithiophobic cosolvents is the 2D electrolyte (TDE) principle, which decouples formulation, coordination, electrochemistry, and function. The molecular-scale understanding of TDEs is expected to accelerate electrolyte innovations in next-generation LIBs.This Account provides insights into recent advancements in electrolytes for superior LIBs from the perspective of lithiophobic agents (i.e., lithiophobic additives and cosolvents), establishing a generalized TDE principle for functional electrolyte design. In bulk electrolytes, a microsolvating competition emerges because of cosolvent-induced dipole-dipole and ion-dipole interactions, forming a loose solvation shell and a kinetically favorable electrolyte. At the electrode/electrolyte interface, the lithiophobic cosolvent affords reliable passivation and efficient desolvation, with interfacial compatibility and electrochemical reversibility even under harsh conditions. Based on this unique coordination chemistry, functional electrolytes are formulated without significantly sacrificing their electrochemical performance. First, lithiophobic cosolvents are used to tune Li-solvent affinity and anion mobility, promoting Li diffusion and electrochemical kinetics of the electrolyte to benefit high-rate and low-temperature applications. Second, the lithiophobic cosolvent undergoes less thermally induced decomposition and constructs a thermally stable interphase in TDEs, affording electrolytes with high-temperature adaptability and cycling stability. Third, the lithiophobic cosolvent modifies the local Li-solvent-anion topography, controlling electrolyte electrochemical reversibility to afford numerous promising solvents that cannot be used in common electrolyte design. Finally, the lithiophobic cosolvent mitigates detrimental crosstalk between flame retardants and carbonate solvents, improving the intrinsic electrolyte safety without compromising electrochemical performance, which broadens the horizons of electrolyte design by optimizing versatile cosolvents and solvents, inspiring new ideas in liquid electrochemistry in other battery systems.
综述
自20世纪90年代商业化以来,锂离子电池(LIBs)在便携式电子设备、电动汽车和大规模储能等应用中得到了越来越广泛的应用。现代社会对LIBs的使用日益增加,这就需要开发高性能的LIBs,包括电化学可逆性、界面稳定性、高效动力学、环境适应性和内在安全性,而这些在商业化电解质中很难同时实现。当前的电解质体系包含一种含有锂盐(如LiPF)和溶剂(如碳酸乙烯酯和碳酸二甲酯)的溶液,其中后者溶解锂盐并与锂发生强烈相互作用(亲锂特性)。只有亲锂剂可以进行功能改性(如添加剂和溶剂),从而改变锂溶剂化物的本体和界面行为。然而,这种方法会改变原始的锂溶剂化和电化学过程,使得难以在电化学性能和其他所需的电解质功能之间取得平衡。这种在亲锂溶剂中的常见电解质设计在配方、配位、电化学和电解质功能之间表现出强烈的耦合。疏锂共溶剂(如多氟醚和氟代芳烃)的发明将电解质设计空间扩展到了亲锂(与锂相互作用)和疏锂(与溶剂相互作用但不与锂相互作用)两个维度。功能改性转向疏锂共溶剂,在对初级锂溶剂化影响较小(由亲锂溶剂决定)的情况下提供优异性能(由疏锂共溶剂带来)。这种基于疏锂共溶剂的电解质工程技术就是二维电解质(TDE)原理,它将配方、配位、电化学和功能解耦。对TDEs的分子尺度理解有望加速下一代LIBs中电解质的创新。
本综述从疏锂剂(即疏锂添加剂和共溶剂)的角度深入探讨了用于高性能LIBs的电解质的最新进展,为功能性电解质设计建立了一个通用的TDE原理。在本体电解质中,由于共溶剂诱导的偶极 - 偶极和离子 - 偶极相互作用,出现了微溶剂化竞争,形成了一个松散的溶剂化壳和一个动力学上有利的电解质。在电极/电解质界面,疏锂共溶剂提供可靠的钝化和高效的去溶剂化,即使在苛刻条件下也具有界面兼容性和电化学可逆性。基于这种独特的配位化学,可以在不显著牺牲其电化学性能的情况下配制功能性电解质。首先,疏锂共溶剂用于调节锂 - 溶剂亲和力和阴离子迁移率,促进电解质的锂扩散和电化学动力学,有利于高倍率和低温应用。其次,疏锂共溶剂热诱导分解较少,并在TDEs中构建热稳定的界面相,提供具有高温适应性和循环稳定性的电解质。第三,疏锂共溶剂改变局部锂 - 溶剂 - 阴离子拓扑结构,控制电解质的电化学可逆性,从而提供许多在普通电解质设计中无法使用的有前景的溶剂。最后,疏锂共溶剂减轻了阻燃剂与碳酸酯溶剂之间的有害串扰,在不损害电化学性能的情况下提高了电解质的内在安全性,这通过优化通用共溶剂和溶剂拓宽了电解质设计的视野,激发了其他电池系统中液体电化学的新思想。