Suppr超能文献

评估格拉斯哥昏迷评分的眼动和运动分量总和作为急性脑损伤患者拔管失败的预测指标。

Evaluating the Sum of Eye and Motor Components of the Glasgow Coma Score As a Predictor of Extubation Failure in Patients With Acute Brain Injury.

机构信息

Interdepartmental Division of Critical Care Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.

Nantes Université, Tours Université, INSERM, UMR 1246 MethodS in Patient-centered outcomes and HEalth REsearch, SPHERE, Nantes, France.

出版信息

Crit Care Med. 2024 Aug 1;52(8):1258-1263. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000006283. Epub 2024 Apr 1.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the association between the pre-extubation sum of eye and motor components of the Glasgow Coma Score (GCS-EM) and odds of extubation failure in patients with acute brain injury being liberated from mechanical ventilation.

DESIGN

Secondary analysis of a prospective, multicenter observational study ( ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT03400904).

SETTING

Sixty-three hospital sites worldwide, with patient recruitment from January 2018 to November 2020.

PATIENTS

One thousand one hundred fifty-two critically ill patients with acute brain injury, with a median age of 54 years, of whom 783 (68.0%) were male, 559 (48.5%) had traumatic brain injury, and 905 (78.6%) had a GCS-EM greater than 8 before extubation (scores range from 2 to 10).

INTERVENTIONS

None.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

GCS-EM was computed in intubated patients on the day of extubation. The main outcome was extubation failure, defined as unplanned reintubation within 5 days of extubation. Analyses used multilevel logistic regression with adjustment for patient characteristics and a random intercept for hospital site. In the primary analysis, GCS-EM was not associated with extubation failure (odds ratio, 1.07 per additional point; 95% CI, 0.87-1.31). Findings were consistent in sensitivity analyses that: 1) used different adjustment covariates, 2) included a verbal estimate to derive an overall GCS, 3) accounted for missing data, 4) considered a 2-day time interval to define extubation failure, 5) accounted for competing risks, and 6) used a propensity score-based model. There was no association between GCS-EM and extubation outcome in subgroups defined by brain injury diagnosis or age.

CONCLUSIONS

In this large, contemporary, multicenter cohort of patients with acute brain injury, we found no association between the GCS-EM and odds of extubation failure. However, few patients had a pre-extubation GCS-EM less than or equal to 8, and the possibility of a true prognostic association in patients with low scores is not excluded.

摘要

目的

评估格拉斯哥昏迷评分(GCS-EM)的眼和运动成分总和与急性脑损伤患者在机械通气撤机后拔管失败的几率之间的关系。

设计

一项前瞻性、多中心观察性研究(ClinicalTrials.gov 标识符 NCT03400904)的二次分析。

设置

全球 63 家医院,于 2018 年 1 月至 2020 年 11 月期间招募患者。

患者

1152 名患有急性脑损伤的危重症患者,中位年龄为 54 岁,其中 783 名(68.0%)为男性,559 名(48.5%)为创伤性脑损伤,905 名(78.6%)在拔管前的 GCS-EM 大于 8(评分范围为 2 至 10)。

干预措施

无。

测量和主要结果

在拔管当天对插管患者计算 GCS-EM。主要结局是拔管失败,定义为拔管后 5 天内计划外重新插管。分析采用多水平逻辑回归,调整患者特征和医院站点的随机截距。在主要分析中,GCS-EM 与拔管失败无关(每增加 1 分的优势比为 1.07;95%CI,0.87-1.31)。敏感性分析结果一致,包括:1)使用不同的调整协变量,2)纳入口头估计以得出总体 GCS,3)考虑缺失数据,4)考虑 2 天时间间隔来定义拔管失败,5)考虑竞争风险,以及 6)使用倾向评分模型。在根据脑损伤诊断或年龄定义的亚组中,GCS-EM 与拔管结局之间没有关联。

结论

在这项针对急性脑损伤患者的大型、现代、多中心队列研究中,我们发现格拉斯哥昏迷评分(GCS-EM)与拔管失败的几率之间没有关联。然而,很少有患者在拔管前的 GCS-EM 评分等于或小于 8,因此不能排除评分较低的患者存在真正的预后关联的可能性。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验