Anaesthesia and ICU Department, Faculty of Medicine, Assiut University Hospital, Assiut City, 7111, Egypt.
Critical Care and Emergency Nursing Department, Faculty of Nursing, Assiut University, Assiut, Egypt.
Neurocrit Care. 2018 Oct;29(2):273-279. doi: 10.1007/s12028-018-0539-3.
Between 25 and 40% of extubated patients with traumatic brain injury (TBI) in the intensive care unit at our hospital (Assiut University Hospital-Assiut-Egypt) require reintubation. This reflects the importance of developing better criteria for predicting successful extubation in TBI. We evaluated the accuracy of semi-quantitative cough strength score (SCSS) and Glasgow coma scale (GCS) in predicting extubation outcomes in TBI.
This prospective observational study included patients (18-65 years), with TBI on mechanical ventilation more than 24 h who were ready to be weaned off. Three tools were used. Tool I: Patient assessment sheet, this tool used to assess socio-demographic and clinical data of patients. Tool II: Semi-quantitative cough strength score (0-5). Tool III: Factors affecting successful extubation, this tool used to confirm the presence or absence of factors that can interfere with the results of extubation outcomes. After extubation, patient was followed up for 72 h to check for extubation success. Multivariate logistic binary regression test was used to calculate odds ratio for different clinical data collected before extubation as independent factors and successful extubation as a dependent factor.
Among 80 patients of mean age 40.6 (± 16.1), 34% were female, median admission GCS was 8 (4-13), extubation occurred on mean post-injury day 6.5 (± 4), and 46.3% required reintubation. Successfully extubated patients had higher semi-quantitative cough scores and GCS. 81.3% patients with SCSS 5 were successfully extubated, while all patients with SCSS 0 were reintubated. All patients with GCS 15 were successfully extubated, and all patients with GCS < 12 required intubation.
SCSS has shown promise in predicting successful extubation in TBI.
在我院(埃及阿西尤特大学医院-阿西尤特)的重症监护病房中,有 25%至 40%的创伤性脑损伤(TBI)拔管患者需要再次插管。这反映了制定更好的 TBI 患者拔管成功预测标准的重要性。我们评估了半定量咳嗽强度评分(SCSS)和格拉斯哥昏迷评分(GCS)在预测 TBI 患者拔管结局方面的准确性。
这项前瞻性观察研究纳入了 80 名年龄在 18 至 65 岁之间、接受机械通气超过 24 小时且准备脱机的 TBI 患者。使用了三种工具。工具 I:患者评估表,用于评估患者的社会人口统计学和临床数据。工具 II:半定量咳嗽强度评分(0-5)。工具 III:影响成功拔管的因素,用于确认是否存在可能影响拔管结果的因素。拔管后,对患者进行了 72 小时的随访,以检查拔管是否成功。多变量逻辑二元回归检验用于计算不同临床数据的比值比,这些数据在拔管前作为独立因素收集,成功拔管作为依赖因素。
在 80 名平均年龄为 40.6(±16.1)岁的患者中,34%为女性,入院时 GCS 中位数为 8(4-13),拔管发生在创伤后平均第 6.5(±4)天,46.3%需要再次插管。成功拔管的患者具有更高的半定量咳嗽评分和 GCS。81.3%的 SCSS 评分 5 分的患者成功拔管,而所有 SCSS 评分 0 分的患者均再次插管。所有 GCS 评分 15 分的患者均成功拔管,所有 GCS<12 分的患者均需要插管。
SCSS 已显示出在预测 TBI 患者拔管成功方面的潜力。