Roy Saurabh, Chhaparwal Yogesh, Kumar Mathangi, Acharya Shruthi, Chhaparwal Shubha, Solomon Monica C
Department of Oral Medicine & Radiology, Manipal College of Dental Sciences, Manipal, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal, Karnataka, India.
Department of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, Manipal College of Dental Sciences, Manipal, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal, Karnataka, India.
J Int Soc Prev Community Dent. 2024 Feb 27;14(1):61-68. doi: 10.4103/jispcd.jispcd_113_23. eCollection 2024 Jan-Feb.
This comparative study evaluated the effectiveness and safety profile of topical amlexanox and triamcinolone for the management of erosive oral lichen planus (EOLP).
This prospective, observational study included 21 patients diagnosed clinically and histopathologically with EOLP and categorized into two groups. Subjects in the two groups were prescribed topical amlexanox and triamcinolone, respectively, for 4 weeks. The area of the erosive lesion and burning sensation was measured at baseline, at the end of the first, 2second, and fourth week. These outcome measures were documented and statistically analyzed. The statistical analyses were performed using the IBM SPSS Statistics version 22. Analysis for age distribution was done by independent sample test. Analysis of sex distribution was done by chi-square test. Variations within a single group for both the outcome parameters were calculated by Wilcoxon signed rank test. ( < 0.05 statistically significant).
A total of 30 erosive sites were evaluated in 21 patients over a 4-week duration. The most common site was the buccal mucosa in both groups (23 of 30; 76.67% of total lesions assessed), followed by the tongue (5 of 30; 16.67% of total lesions assessed), the palate (1 of 30; 3.33% of total sites assessed), and the maxillary attached gingiva (1 of 30; 3.33% of total sites assessed). Group 1 (amlexanox) was comprised of 11 subjects, whereas Group 2 (triamcinolone) was comprised of 10 subjects. Pre and posttreatment comparison revealed no statistically significant difference ( = 0.756; 0.512, respectively), for the area of the erosion and burning sensation. Intragroup analysis showed that in Groups 1 and 2, there was a statistically significant reduction in the measures posttreatment ( < 0.05).
Amlexanox provides an earlier onset of pain relief in the treatment of EOLP, whereas providing a comparable reduction in the erosive area compared with triamcinolone. Topical amlexanox appears to be as effective as triamcinolone and is a promising alternative in the management of the erosive lichen planus with minimal adverse effects.
本比较研究评估了局部用氨来呫诺和曲安奈德治疗糜烂性口腔扁平苔藓(EOLP)的有效性和安全性。
这项前瞻性观察性研究纳入了21例经临床和组织病理学诊断为EOLP的患者,并分为两组。两组受试者分别局部应用氨来呫诺和曲安奈德,为期4周。在基线、第1周、第2周和第4周结束时测量糜烂性病变面积和灼痛感觉。记录这些结果指标并进行统计分析。使用IBM SPSS Statistics 22版进行统计分析。年龄分布分析采用独立样本检验。性别分布分析采用卡方检验。两组结果参数的组内差异采用Wilcoxon符号秩检验计算。(P<0.05具有统计学意义)。
在4周的时间里,对21例患者共30个糜烂部位进行了评估。两组中最常见的部位均为颊黏膜(30个中的23个;占评估总病变的76.67%),其次是舌(30个中的5个;占评估总病变的16.67%)、腭(30个中的1个;占评估总部位的3.33%)和上颌附着龈(30个中的1个;占评估总部位的3.33%)。第1组(氨来呫诺)由11名受试者组成,而第2组(曲安奈德)由10名受试者组成。治疗前后比较显示,糜烂面积和灼痛感觉无统计学显著差异(分别为P = 0.756;P = 0.512)。组内分析表明,第1组和第2组治疗后各项指标均有统计学显著降低(P<0.05)。
氨来呫诺在治疗EOLP时能更早缓解疼痛,与曲安奈德相比,糜烂面积减少程度相当。局部用氨来呫诺似乎与曲安奈德一样有效,并且是治疗糜烂性扁平苔藓的一种有前景的替代药物,副作用最小。