Suppr超能文献

肺栓塞应对团队登记处内治疗方法及后续结果的比较

Comparison of Treatment Approaches and Subsequent Outcomes within a Pulmonary Embolism Response Team Registry.

作者信息

Weekes Anthony J, Trautmann Ariana, Hambright Parker L, Ali Shane, Pikus Angela M, Wellinsky Nicole, Goonan Kelly L, Bradford Sarah, O'Connell Nathaniel S

机构信息

Department of Emergency Medicine, Atrium Health's Carolinas Medical Center, Charlotte, North Carolina, USA.

Tulane University School of Medicine, New Orleans, Louisiana, USA.

出版信息

Crit Care Res Pract. 2024 Mar 22;2024:5590805. doi: 10.1155/2024/5590805. eCollection 2024.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To characterize the association between pulmonary embolism (PE) severity and bleeding risk with treatment approaches, outcomes, and complications.

METHODS

Secondary analysis of an 11-hospital registry of adult ED patients treated by a PE response team (August 2016-November 2022). Predictors were PE severity and bleeding risk. The primary outcome was treatment approach: anticoagulation monotherapy vs. advanced intervention (categorized as "immediate" or "delayed" based on whether the intervention was received within 12 hours of PE diagnosis or not). Secondary outcomes were death, clinical deterioration, and major bleeding.

RESULTS

Of the 1832 patients, 139 (7.6%), 977 (53.3%), and 9 (0.5%) were classified as high-risk, intermediate-high, intermediate-low, and low-risk severity, respectively. There were 94 deaths (5.1%) and 218 patients (11.9%) had one or more clinical deterioration events. Advanced interventions were administered to 86 (61.9%), 195 (27.6%), and 109 (11.2%) patients with high-risk, intermediate-high, and intermediate-low severity, respectively.Major bleeding occurred in 61/1440 (4.2%) on ACm versus 169/392 (7.6%) with advanced interventions (p <0.001): bleeding withcatheter-directed thrombolysiswas 19/145 (13.1%) versus 33/154(21.4%) with systemic thrombolysis,p= 0.07. High risk was twice as strong as intermediate-high risk for association with advanced intervention (OR: 5.3 (4.2 and 6.9) vs. 1.9 (1.6 and 2.2)). High risk (OR: 56.3 (32.0 and 99.2) and intermediate-high risk (OR: 2.6 (1.7 and 4.0)) were strong predictors of clinical deterioration. Major bleeding was significantly associated with advanced interventions (OR: 5.2 (3.5 and 7.8) for immediate, 3.3 (1.8 and 6.2)) for delayed, and high-risk PE severity (OR: 3.4 (1.9 and 5.8)).

CONCLUSIONS

Advanced intervention use was associated with high-acuity patients experiencing death, clinical deterioration, and major bleeding with a trend towards less bleeding with catheter-directed interventions versus systemic thrombolysis.

摘要

目的

描述肺栓塞(PE)严重程度与出血风险之间的关联,以及治疗方法、结局和并发症之间的关系。

方法

对一个由11家医院组成的登记处中接受PE反应团队治疗的成年急诊患者进行二次分析(2016年8月至2022年11月)。预测因素为PE严重程度和出血风险。主要结局为治疗方法:抗凝单药治疗与高级干预(根据干预是否在PE诊断后12小时内进行分为“立即”或“延迟”)。次要结局为死亡、临床恶化和大出血。

结果

在1832例患者中,分别有139例(7.6%)、977例(53.3%)、9例(0.5%)被分类为高风险、中高风险、中低风险和低风险严重程度。有94例死亡(5.1%),218例患者(11.9%)发生了一次或多次临床恶化事件。高风险、中高风险和中低风险严重程度的患者分别有86例(61.9%)、195例(27.6%)和109例(11.2%)接受了高级干预。接受抗凝单药治疗的1440例患者中有61例(4.2%)发生大出血,而接受高级干预的392例患者中有169例(7.6%)发生大出血(p<0.001):导管定向溶栓治疗的出血率为19/145(13.1%),而全身溶栓治疗的出血率为33/154(21.4%),p = 0.07。与高级干预相关的高风险是中高风险的两倍(比值比:5.3(4.2和6.9)对1.9(1.6和2.2))。高风险(比值比:56.3(32.0和99.2))和中高风险(比值比:2.6(1.7和4.0))是临床恶化的强预测因素。大出血与高级干预(立即干预的比值比:5.2(3.5和7.8),延迟干预的比值比:3.3(1.8和6.2))以及高风险PE严重程度(比值比:3.4(1.9和5.8))显著相关。

结论

高级干预的使用与高急症患者的死亡、临床恶化和大出血相关,导管定向干预与全身溶栓相比有出血减少的趋势。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2cf0/10980543/4a4f0a7ab059/CCRP2024-5590805.001.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验