Dautzenberg Lauren, Numan Lieke, Knol Wilma, Gianoli Monica, van der Meer Manon G, Troost-Oppelaar Anne-Marie, Westendorp Aline F, Emmelot-Vonk Marielle H, van Laake Linda W, Koek Huiberdina L
Department of Geriatric Medicine, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
Department of Cardiology, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
Am Heart J Plus. 2022 Dec 5;24:100233. doi: 10.1016/j.ahjo.2022.100233. eCollection 2022 Dec.
The prevalence of (hyper)polypharmacy in patients on left ventricular assist device (LVAD) support and its effect on clinical outcomeis unknown. Therefore, we aimed to determine the prevalence of (hyper)polypharmacy in LVAD patients and evaluate its association with mortality and complications.
210 patients aged ≥40 years who received a primary LVAD implantation between 2011 and 2019 were included for analysis. Polypharmacy and hyperpolypharmacy were defined as the concomitant use of 5-9 and ≥10 medications at discharge after LVAD implantation, respectively. Cause specific cox regression was used to assess the association of ≥10 medications with mortality, cardiac arrhythmia, driveline infection and major bleeding.
The median age of the patients was 57.5 years, and 35.7 % were female. The average number of discharge medications was 8.8 ± 2.3 per patient. The prevalence of patients with 5-9 medications and ≥10 medications was 62.9 % and 34.8 %, respectively. The median follow-up duration was 948 days (interquartile range 874 days). The prescription of ≥10 medications was significantly associated with a higher risk of mortality (HR 2.03; 95 % CI 1.15-3.6, -value 0.02) adjusted for sex, age, comorbidity and stratified for device type. The prescription of ≥10 medications was not associated with a higher risk of major bleeding, cardiac arrhythmia or driveline infection.
(Hyper)polypharmacy is highly prevalent in LVAD patients and is independently associated with a higher risk of mortality. Future research is needed to assess the efficacy of individual risk-benefit profiling of (cardiovascular) medication to ensure appropriate polypharmacy and to decrease negative health outcomes.
左心室辅助装置(LVAD)支持患者中(超)多重用药的患病率及其对临床结局的影响尚不清楚。因此,我们旨在确定LVAD患者中(超)多重用药的患病率,并评估其与死亡率和并发症的关联。
纳入2011年至2019年间接受初次LVAD植入的210例年龄≥40岁的患者进行分析。多重用药和超多重用药分别定义为LVAD植入术后出院时同时使用5 - 9种和≥10种药物。采用病因特异性Cox回归分析评估≥10种药物与死亡率、心律失常、导线感染和大出血之间的关联。
患者的中位年龄为57.5岁,女性占35.7%。每位患者出院时使用药物的平均数量为8.8±2.3种。使用5 - 9种药物和≥10种药物的患者患病率分别为62.9%和34.8%。中位随访时间为948天(四分位间距874天)。在对性别、年龄、合并症进行校正并按装置类型分层后,使用≥10种药物与更高的死亡风险显著相关(风险比2.03;95%置信区间1.15 - 3.6,P值0.02)。使用≥10种药物与大出血、心律失常或导线感染的更高风险无关。
(超)多重用药在LVAD患者中非常普遍,并且与更高的死亡风险独立相关。需要进一步研究来评估(心血管)药物个体风险效益分析的有效性,以确保合理的多重用药并减少不良健康结局。