Ingham Gemma, Urban Kat, Phyo Yinyin, Hunt Jane, Tuffin Penelope, Seah Davinia
Department of Palliative Care, Prince of Wales Hospital, Randwick, New South Wales, Australia.
Department of Palliative Care, Lismore Base Hospital, Lismore, New South Wales, Australia.
Palliat Med Rep. 2024 Mar 13;5(1):116-121. doi: 10.1089/pmr.2023.0050. eCollection 2024.
Fatigue is a common and distressing symptom for palliative care patients. Although the current literature emphasizes nonpharmacological management, dexamethasone is reportedly used in clinical practice. This study helps to characterize its use, efficacy, and adverse effects in a real-world setting.
To improve the evidence base by exploring the use, efficacy, and side effect profile of dexamethasone for fatigue management.
This international multisite prospective observational case series assessed the benefit and adverse effects of dexamethasone at baseline (T0) and at five to seven days postbaseline (T1). Fatigue scores were assessed using the symptom assessment scale (SAS) and visual analogue fatigue scale (VAFS). Adverse events were graded using the National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI-CTCAE). The related samples Wilcoxon signed-rank test was used to compare before and after scores.
All 18 patients (male-female, 11:7) had advanced metastatic cancer with most in the deteriorating palliative care phase (56%). The most common dose of dexamethasone was 4 mg daily orally. At T1 ( = 12), improvement was seen in all measures of fatigue; the median SAS scores decreased from 7 to 5.5 ( = 0.007), the median VAFS scores increased from 3 to 5 ( = 0.126), and the median NCI-CTCAE fatigue scores were reduced from 3 to 2.5 ( = 0.18). Dexamethasone was well tolerated; one participant experienced grade 3 delirium.
The small number of participants recruited for this study suggests that dexamethasone is not widely used specifically for fatigue. Our results suggest an improvement in fatigue scores from T0 to T1.
疲劳是姑息治疗患者常见且令人痛苦的症状。尽管当前文献强调非药物管理,但据报道地塞米松在临床实践中仍被使用。本研究有助于描述其在实际应用中的使用情况、疗效和不良反应。
通过探索地塞米松用于管理疲劳的使用情况、疗效和副作用,改善证据基础。
本国际多中心前瞻性观察病例系列评估了地塞米松在基线(T0)以及基线后五至七天(T1)的益处和不良反应。使用症状评估量表(SAS)和视觉模拟疲劳量表(VAFS)评估疲劳评分。使用美国国立癌症研究所不良事件通用术语标准(NCI-CTCAE)对不良事件进行分级。采用相关样本Wilcoxon符号秩检验比较前后评分。
所有18例患者(男∶女为11∶7)均患有晚期转移性癌症,大多数处于姑息治疗恶化阶段(56%)。地塞米松最常用剂量为每日口服4毫克。在T1(n = 12)时,所有疲劳指标均有改善;SAS评分中位数从7降至5.5(P = 0.007),VAFS评分中位数从3升至5(P = 0.126),NCI-CTCAE疲劳评分中位数从3降至2.5(P = 0.18)。地塞米松耐受性良好;一名参与者出现3级谵妄。
本研究招募的参与者数量较少,表明地塞米松并非专门广泛用于治疗疲劳。我们的结果表明从T0到T1疲劳评分有所改善。