Newcastle University, Newcastle, United Kingdom.
Functional Gut Clinic, Manchester, United Kingdom.
Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2024 Jul;36(7):e14793. doi: 10.1111/nmo.14793. Epub 2024 Apr 2.
Rumination is characterized by the repeated regurgitation of food. Rumination syndrome is a disorder of gut-brain interaction diagnosed by Rome criteria, whereas rumination disorder is a feeding and eating disorder diagnosed by DSM-5 criteria. We aimed to determine the global prevalence of rumination according to these criteria across all age groups.
We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of studies reporting the prevalence of rumination syndrome according to Rome III and Rome IV and rumination disorder according to the following validated DSM-5 assessments: PARDI, EDA-5, EDY-Q, STEP, and STEP-CHILD. We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, and PsychINFO (from January 1, 2006, to June 1, 2023) to identify studies reporting the prevalence of rumination in community settings in participants of any age. We did a meta-analysis to estimate the pooled prevalence and odds ratio (OR) of rumination according to diagnostic criteria, country, and characteristics such as age and sex.
The search strategy generated 1243 studies, of which 147 studies appeared to be relevant. Thirty studies were included, with a total of 114,228 participants, of whom 61,534 of these were adults and 52,694 were children. The pooled prevalence of rumination syndrome in children of all ages according to Rome III criteria was 1.0% (95% CI 0.3-1.6; I 91.1%), but no data were available for adults. According to Rome IV criteria, the pooled prevalence of rumination syndrome in children of all ages was 0.4% (95% CI 0.2-0.6; I 56.4%) and 3.7% in adults (95% CI 2.3-5.1; I 91.4%). The pooled prevalence of rumination disorder in children of all ages according to EDY-Q was 2.1% (95% CI 0.9-3.4; I = 78.1%), but only one study utilizing EDY-Q in adults was included (0.7% [95% CI 0.4-1.0]). No data were available for children or adults using any other validated DSM-5 assessments for rumination disorder. Irrespective of diagnostic criteria, the pooled prevalence of rumination was higher in adults compared to children and adolescents (3.0% [95% CI 1.4-4.7; I = 98.1%] vs. 0.8% [95% CI 0.4-1.3; I = 90.8%]), but higher in adolescents than in children (1.1% [95% CI 0.3-2.0; I = 92.8%] vs. 0.1% [95% CI 0.0-0.2; I = 24.5%]). In adults, factors independently associated with rumination were female gender (OR 1.4 [95% CI 1.0-2.0]), anxiety (OR 2.3 [95% CI 2.1-2.6]), and depression (OR 1.8 [95% CI 1.2-2.9]). No association between gender and rumination was seen in children.
The prevalence of rumination is more common in adults than in children. In adults, rumination is associated with female gender, anxiety, and depression. Future population studies should aim to better understand why this behavior is more common in adults and also compare validated DSM-5 assessments for rumination disorder with Rome criteria for rumination syndrome as prevalence may differ.
反刍是指食物反复回流。反刍综合征是一种由罗马标准诊断的肠道-大脑相互作用障碍,而反刍障碍是一种由 DSM-5 标准诊断的喂养和进食障碍。我们的目的是根据这些标准确定所有年龄段反刍的全球患病率。
我们对报告反刍综合征(根据罗马 III 和罗马 IV 标准)和反刍障碍(根据以下经过验证的 DSM-5 评估:PARDI、EDA-5、EDY-Q、STEP 和 STEP-CHILD)的患病率的研究进行了系统回顾和荟萃分析。我们搜索了 MEDLINE、EMBASE 和 PsychINFO(从 2006 年 1 月 1 日至 2023 年 6 月 1 日),以确定报告社区环境中任何年龄段参与者反刍患病率的研究。我们进行了荟萃分析,以根据诊断标准、国家以及年龄和性别等特征估计反刍的汇总患病率和优势比(OR)。
搜索策略生成了 1243 项研究,其中有 147 项研究似乎相关。纳入了 30 项研究,共有 114228 名参与者,其中 61534 名是成年人,52694 名是儿童。根据罗马 III 标准,所有年龄段儿童的反刍综合征患病率为 1.0%(95%CI 0.3-1.6;I91.1%),但成年人没有数据。根据罗马 IV 标准,所有年龄段儿童的反刍综合征患病率为 0.4%(95%CI 0.2-0.6;I56.4%),成年人的患病率为 3.7%(95%CI 2.3-5.1;I91.4%)。根据 EDY-Q,所有年龄段儿童的反刍障碍患病率为 2.1%(95%CI 0.9-3.4;I=78.1%),但只有一项利用 EDY-Q 的成年人研究纳入其中(0.7%[95%CI 0.4-1.0])。没有关于任何其他经过验证的 DSM-5 评估反刍障碍的儿童或成年人的数据。无论诊断标准如何,与儿童和青少年相比,成年人的反刍患病率更高(3.0%[95%CI 1.4-4.7;I=98.1%]与 0.8%[95%CI 0.4-1.3;I=90.8%]),但青少年的患病率高于儿童(1.1%[95%CI 0.3-2.0;I=92.8%]与 0.1%[95%CI 0.0-0.2;I=24.5%])。在成年人中,与反刍相关的独立因素是女性性别(OR 1.4[95%CI 1.0-2.0])、焦虑(OR 2.3[95%CI 2.1-2.6])和抑郁(OR 1.8[95%CI 1.2-2.9])。在儿童中,性别与反刍之间没有关联。
反刍的患病率在成年人中比在儿童中更为常见。在成年人中,反刍与女性性别、焦虑和抑郁有关。未来的人群研究应旨在更好地了解为什么这种行为在成年人中更为常见,同时还应比较经过验证的 DSM-5 评估与罗马标准诊断的反刍综合征,因为患病率可能有所不同。