• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

反刍综合征和反刍障碍的患病率:系统评价和荟萃分析。

The prevalence of rumination syndrome and rumination disorder: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

机构信息

Newcastle University, Newcastle, United Kingdom.

Functional Gut Clinic, Manchester, United Kingdom.

出版信息

Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2024 Jul;36(7):e14793. doi: 10.1111/nmo.14793. Epub 2024 Apr 2.

DOI:10.1111/nmo.14793
PMID:38563201
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Rumination is characterized by the repeated regurgitation of food. Rumination syndrome is a disorder of gut-brain interaction diagnosed by Rome criteria, whereas rumination disorder is a feeding and eating disorder diagnosed by DSM-5 criteria. We aimed to determine the global prevalence of rumination according to these criteria across all age groups.

METHODS

We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of studies reporting the prevalence of rumination syndrome according to Rome III and Rome IV and rumination disorder according to the following validated DSM-5 assessments: PARDI, EDA-5, EDY-Q, STEP, and STEP-CHILD. We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, and PsychINFO (from January 1, 2006, to June 1, 2023) to identify studies reporting the prevalence of rumination in community settings in participants of any age. We did a meta-analysis to estimate the pooled prevalence and odds ratio (OR) of rumination according to diagnostic criteria, country, and characteristics such as age and sex.

KEY RESULTS

The search strategy generated 1243 studies, of which 147 studies appeared to be relevant. Thirty studies were included, with a total of 114,228 participants, of whom 61,534 of these were adults and 52,694 were children. The pooled prevalence of rumination syndrome in children of all ages according to Rome III criteria was 1.0% (95% CI 0.3-1.6; I 91.1%), but no data were available for adults. According to Rome IV criteria, the pooled prevalence of rumination syndrome in children of all ages was 0.4% (95% CI 0.2-0.6; I 56.4%) and 3.7% in adults (95% CI 2.3-5.1; I 91.4%). The pooled prevalence of rumination disorder in children of all ages according to EDY-Q was 2.1% (95% CI 0.9-3.4; I = 78.1%), but only one study utilizing EDY-Q in adults was included (0.7% [95% CI 0.4-1.0]). No data were available for children or adults using any other validated DSM-5 assessments for rumination disorder. Irrespective of diagnostic criteria, the pooled prevalence of rumination was higher in adults compared to children and adolescents (3.0% [95% CI 1.4-4.7; I = 98.1%] vs. 0.8% [95% CI 0.4-1.3; I = 90.8%]), but higher in adolescents than in children (1.1% [95% CI 0.3-2.0; I = 92.8%] vs. 0.1% [95% CI 0.0-0.2; I = 24.5%]). In adults, factors independently associated with rumination were female gender (OR 1.4 [95% CI 1.0-2.0]), anxiety (OR 2.3 [95% CI 2.1-2.6]), and depression (OR 1.8 [95% CI 1.2-2.9]). No association between gender and rumination was seen in children.

CONCLUSIONS AND INFERENCES

The prevalence of rumination is more common in adults than in children. In adults, rumination is associated with female gender, anxiety, and depression. Future population studies should aim to better understand why this behavior is more common in adults and also compare validated DSM-5 assessments for rumination disorder with Rome criteria for rumination syndrome as prevalence may differ.

摘要

背景

反刍是指食物反复回流。反刍综合征是一种由罗马标准诊断的肠道-大脑相互作用障碍,而反刍障碍是一种由 DSM-5 标准诊断的喂养和进食障碍。我们的目的是根据这些标准确定所有年龄段反刍的全球患病率。

方法

我们对报告反刍综合征(根据罗马 III 和罗马 IV 标准)和反刍障碍(根据以下经过验证的 DSM-5 评估:PARDI、EDA-5、EDY-Q、STEP 和 STEP-CHILD)的患病率的研究进行了系统回顾和荟萃分析。我们搜索了 MEDLINE、EMBASE 和 PsychINFO(从 2006 年 1 月 1 日至 2023 年 6 月 1 日),以确定报告社区环境中任何年龄段参与者反刍患病率的研究。我们进行了荟萃分析,以根据诊断标准、国家以及年龄和性别等特征估计反刍的汇总患病率和优势比(OR)。

主要结果

搜索策略生成了 1243 项研究,其中有 147 项研究似乎相关。纳入了 30 项研究,共有 114228 名参与者,其中 61534 名是成年人,52694 名是儿童。根据罗马 III 标准,所有年龄段儿童的反刍综合征患病率为 1.0%(95%CI 0.3-1.6;I91.1%),但成年人没有数据。根据罗马 IV 标准,所有年龄段儿童的反刍综合征患病率为 0.4%(95%CI 0.2-0.6;I56.4%),成年人的患病率为 3.7%(95%CI 2.3-5.1;I91.4%)。根据 EDY-Q,所有年龄段儿童的反刍障碍患病率为 2.1%(95%CI 0.9-3.4;I=78.1%),但只有一项利用 EDY-Q 的成年人研究纳入其中(0.7%[95%CI 0.4-1.0])。没有关于任何其他经过验证的 DSM-5 评估反刍障碍的儿童或成年人的数据。无论诊断标准如何,与儿童和青少年相比,成年人的反刍患病率更高(3.0%[95%CI 1.4-4.7;I=98.1%]与 0.8%[95%CI 0.4-1.3;I=90.8%]),但青少年的患病率高于儿童(1.1%[95%CI 0.3-2.0;I=92.8%]与 0.1%[95%CI 0.0-0.2;I=24.5%])。在成年人中,与反刍相关的独立因素是女性性别(OR 1.4[95%CI 1.0-2.0])、焦虑(OR 2.3[95%CI 2.1-2.6])和抑郁(OR 1.8[95%CI 1.2-2.9])。在儿童中,性别与反刍之间没有关联。

结论和推论

反刍的患病率在成年人中比在儿童中更为常见。在成年人中,反刍与女性性别、焦虑和抑郁有关。未来的人群研究应旨在更好地了解为什么这种行为在成年人中更为常见,同时还应比较经过验证的 DSM-5 评估与罗马标准诊断的反刍综合征,因为患病率可能有所不同。

相似文献

1
The prevalence of rumination syndrome and rumination disorder: A systematic review and meta-analysis.反刍综合征和反刍障碍的患病率:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2024 Jul;36(7):e14793. doi: 10.1111/nmo.14793. Epub 2024 Apr 2.
2
Global prevalence of irritable bowel syndrome according to Rome III or IV criteria: a systematic review and meta-analysis.根据罗马 III 或 IV 标准,全球肠易激综合征的患病率:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2020 Oct;5(10):908-917. doi: 10.1016/S2468-1253(20)30217-X. Epub 2020 Jul 20.
3
Global Prevalence and Impact of Rumination Syndrome.全球性反刍综合征的流行状况及影响
Gastroenterology. 2022 Mar;162(3):731-742.e9. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2021.11.008. Epub 2021 Nov 11.
4
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
5
Global prevalence of functional constipation according to the Rome criteria: a systematic review and meta-analysis.根据罗马标准,全球功能性便秘的患病率:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2021 Aug;6(8):638-648. doi: 10.1016/S2468-1253(21)00111-4. Epub 2021 Jun 4.
6
Detection and characteristics of rumination syndrome in patients presenting for gastric symptom evaluation.胃症状评估患者中反刍综合征的检测与特征。
Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2021 Aug;33(8):e14103. doi: 10.1111/nmo.14103. Epub 2021 Mar 17.
7
The factor structure and validity of a diagnostic interview for avoidant/restrictive food intake disorder in a sample of children, adolescents, and young adults.在儿童、青少年和年轻成年人样本中,用于诊断回避/限制型食物摄入障碍的诊断访谈的因子结构和有效性。
Int J Eat Disord. 2022 Nov;55(11):1575-1588. doi: 10.1002/eat.23792. Epub 2022 Aug 18.
8
Deployment of personnel to military operations: impact on mental health and social functioning.人员部署到军事行动中:对心理健康和社会功能的影响。
Campbell Syst Rev. 2018 Jun 1;14(1):1-127. doi: 10.4073/csr.2018.6. eCollection 2018.
9
Prevalence of pica and rumination behaviours in adults and associations with eating disorder and general psychopathology: findings form a population-based study.成人异食癖和反刍行为的流行率及其与饮食障碍和一般精神病理学的关联:一项基于人群的研究结果。
Epidemiol Psychiatr Sci. 2022 Jun 9;31:e40. doi: 10.1017/S2045796022000208.
10
Prevalence in primary school youth of pica and rumination behavior: The understudied feeding disorders.小学生中异食癖和反刍行为的流行:被忽视的喂养障碍。
Int J Eat Disord. 2018 Aug;51(8):994-998. doi: 10.1002/eat.22898. Epub 2018 Sep 2.

引用本文的文献

1
Effect of ChatGPT use on eating disorders and body image.ChatGPT的使用对饮食失调和身体形象的影响。
World J Psychiatry. 2025 Aug 19;15(8):107122. doi: 10.5498/wjp.v15.i8.107122.