Veterinary Education, Research and Outreach Program, Texas A&M University, Canyon, TX, United States of America.
Department of Pathobiology and Population Medicine, College of Veterinary Medicine, Mississippi State University, Starkville, Mississippi State, United States of America.
PLoS One. 2024 Apr 2;19(4):e0300285. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0300285. eCollection 2024.
Previous research on stabilization methods for microbiome investigations has largely focused on human fecal samples. There are a few studies using feces from other species, but no published studies investigating preservation of samples collected from cattle. Given that microbial taxa are differentially impacted during storage it is warranted to study impacts of preservation methods on microbial communities found in samples outside of human fecal samples. Here we tested methods of preserving bovine fecal respiratory specimens for up to 2 weeks at four temperatures (room temperature, 4°C, -20°C, and -80°C) by comparing microbial diversity and community composition to samples extracted immediately after collection. Importantly, fecal specimens preserved and analyzed were technical replicates, providing a look at the effects of preservation method in the absence of biological variation. We found that preservation with the OMNIgene®•GUT kit resulted in community structure most like that of fresh samples extracted immediately, even when stored at room temperature (~20°C). Samples that were flash-frozen without added preservation solution were the next most representative of original communities, while samples preserved with ethanol were the least representative. These results contradict previous reports that ethanol is effective in preserving fecal communities and suggest for studies investigating cattle either flash-freezing of samples without preservative or preservation with OMNIgene®•GUT will yield more representative microbial communities.
先前关于微生物组研究稳定化方法的研究主要集中在人类粪便样本上。有一些使用来自其他物种粪便的研究,但没有发表研究调查从牛收集的样本的保存。鉴于在储存过程中微生物类群受到不同的影响,有必要研究保存方法对人类粪便样本以外的样本中微生物群落的影响。在这里,我们通过比较微生物多样性和群落组成,测试了在四个温度(室温、4°C、-20°C 和-80°C)下保存牛粪便呼吸标本长达 2 周的方法,与采集后立即提取的样本进行比较。重要的是,保存和分析的粪便标本是技术重复,在没有生物学变异的情况下观察保存方法的影响。我们发现,使用 OMNIgene®•GUT 试剂盒进行保存的结果与立即提取的新鲜样本的群落结构最相似,即使在室温(约 20°C)下保存也是如此。未添加保存溶液的快速冷冻样本是最能代表原始群落的样本,而用乙醇保存的样本则最不具有代表性。这些结果与以前的报告相矛盾,以前的报告表明乙醇可有效保存粪便群落,并建议对研究牛的研究要么不使用防腐剂进行快速冷冻保存,要么使用 OMNIgene®•GUT 进行保存,这样可以得到更具代表性的微生物群落。