From the Department of Health Sciences, Ribeirão Preto Medical School, University of São Paulo, Ribeirão Preto, Sao Paulo, Brazil.
Division of Cardiology, Ribeirão Preto Medical School, University of São Paulo, Ribeirao Preto, Sao Paulo, Brazil.
Menopause. 2024 May 1;31(5):408-414. doi: 10.1097/GME.0000000000002348. Epub 2024 Apr 1.
We investigated the systemic arterial hypertension effects on cardiovascular autonomic modulation and baroreflex sensitivity (BRS) in women with or without preserved ovarian function.
A total of 120 women were allocated into two groups: middle-aged premenopausal women (42 ± 3 y old; n = 60) and postmenopausal women (57 ± 4 y old; n = 60). Each group was also divided into two smaller groups (n = 30): normotensive and hypertensive. We evaluated hemodynamic and anthropometric parameters, cardiorespiratory fitness, BRS, heart rate variability (HRV), and blood pressure variability. The effects of hypertension and menopause were assessed using a two-way analysis of variance. Post hoc comparisons were performed using the Student-Newman-Keuls test.
Comparing premenopausal groups, women with systemic arterial hypertension showed lower BRS (9.1 ± 4.4 vs 13.4 ± 4.2 ms/mm Hg, P < 0.001 ) and HRV total variance (1,451 ± 955 vs 2,483 ± 1,959 ms 2 , P = 0.005) values than normotensive; however, the vagal predominance still remained. On the other hand, both postmenopausal groups showed an expressive reduction in BRS (8.3 ± 4.2 vs 11.3 ± 4.8 ms/mm Hg, P < 0.001) and HRV characterized by sympathetic modulation predominance (low-frequency oscillations; 56% ± 17 vs 44% ± 17, P < 0.001), in addition to a significant increase in blood pressure variability variance (28.4 ± 14.9 vs 22.4 ± 12.5 mm Hg 2 , P = 0.015) compared with premenopausal groups. Comparing both postmenopausal groups, the hypertensive group had significantly lower values of HRV total variance (635 ± 449 vs 2,053 ± 1,720 ms 2 , P < 0.001) and BRS (5.3 ± 2.8 vs 11.3 ± 3.2 ms/mm Hg) than the normotensive.
Hypertensive middle-aged premenopausal women present HRV autonomic modulation impairment, but they still maintain a vagal predominance. After menopause, even normotensive women show sympathetic autonomic predominance, which may also be associated with aging. Furthermore, postmenopausal women with hypertension present even worse cardiac autonomic modulation.
研究女性伴或不伴卵巢功能保留的系统性动脉高血压对心血管自主调节和压力反射敏感性(BRS)的影响。
共纳入 120 名女性,分为两组:中年绝经前女性(42±3 岁;n=60)和绝经后女性(57±4 岁;n=60)。每组又分为两组(n=30):正常血压和高血压。评估血流动力学和人体测量参数、心肺适能、BRS、心率变异性(HRV)和血压变异性。采用双因素方差分析评估高血压和绝经的影响。使用学生-纽曼-凯尔斯检验进行事后比较。
与绝经前组相比,高血压组的 BRS(9.1±4.4 对 13.4±4.2 ms/mm Hg,P<0.001)和 HRV 总方差(1451±955 对 2483±1959 ms 2 ,P=0.005)值较低,但迷走神经优势仍存在。另一方面,两组绝经后女性的 BRS(8.3±4.2 对 11.3±4.8 ms/mm Hg,P<0.001)和 HRV 均明显下降,表现为交感神经调节优势(低频振荡;56%±17 对 44%±17,P<0.001),且血压变异性方差显著增加(28.4±14.9 对 22.4±12.5 mm Hg 2 ,P=0.015)与绝经前组相比。与两组绝经后女性相比,高血压组的 HRV 总方差(635±449 对 2053±1720 ms 2 ,P<0.001)和 BRS(5.3±2.8 对 11.3±3.2 ms/mm Hg)值显著降低。
中年绝经前高血压女性的 HRV 自主调节受损,但仍保持迷走神经优势。绝经后,即使血压正常的女性也表现出交感神经优势,这可能也与衰老有关。此外,高血压绝经后女性的心脏自主神经调节更差。