• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

癫痫与抗癫痫药物治疗中心率变异性的系统评价和荟萃分析。

A systematic review and meta-analysis of heart rate variability in epilepsy and antiepileptic drugs.

机构信息

Clinical Research Center, University Hospital, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.

出版信息

Epilepsia. 2012 Feb;53(2):272-82. doi: 10.1111/j.1528-1167.2011.03361.x. Epub 2012 Jan 5.

DOI:10.1111/j.1528-1167.2011.03361.x
PMID:22221253
Abstract

PURPOSE

Epilepsy is associated with near-fatal and fatal arrhythmias, and sudden unexpected death in epilepsy (SUDEP) is partly related to cardiac events. Dysfunction of the autonomous nervous system causes arrhythmias and, although previous studies have investigated the effects of epilepsy on the autonomic control of the heart, the results are still mixed regarding whether imbalance of sympathetic, vagal, or both systems is present in epilepsy, and also the importance of anticonvulsant treatment on the autonomic system. Therefore, we aimed to investigate epilepsy and its treatment impact on heart rate variability (HRV), assessed by sympathetic and parasympathetic activity expressed as low-frequency (LF) and high-frequency (HF) power spectrum, respectively.

METHOD

We performed a systematic review from the first date available to July 2011 in Medline and other databases; key search terms were "epilepsy"; "anticonvulsants"; "heart rate variability"; "vagal"; and "autonomous nervous system." Original studies that reported data and/or statistics of at least one HRV value were included, with data being extracted by two independent authors. We used a random-effects model with Hedges's g as the measurement of effect size to perform two main meta-analyses comparing LF and HF HRV values in (1) epilepsy patients versus controls; (2) patients receiving versus not receiving treatment; and (3) well-controlled versus refractory patients. Secondary analyses assessed other time- and frequency-domain measurements (nonlinear methods were not analyzed due to lack of sufficient data sets). Quality assessment of each study was verified and also meta-analytic techniques to identify and control bias. Meta-regression for age and gender was performed.

KEY FINDINGS

Initially, 366 references were identified. According to our eligibility criteria, 30 references (39 studies) were included in our analysis. Regarding HF, epilepsy patients presented lower values (g -0.69) than controls, with the 95% confidence interval (CI) ranging from -1.05 to -0.33. No significant differences were observed for LF (g -0.18; 95% CI -0.71 to 0.35). Patients receiving treatment presented HF values to those not receiving treatment (g -0.05; 95% CI -0.37 to 0.27), with a trend for having higher LF values (g 0.1; 95% CI -0.13 to 0.33), which was more pronounced in those receiving antiepileptic drugs (vs. vagus nerve stimulation). No differences were observed for well-controlled versus refractory patients, possibly due to the low number of studies. Regression for age and gender did not influence the results. Finally, secondary time-domain analyses also showed lower HRV and lower vagal activity in patients with epilepsy, as shown by the standard deviation of normal-to-normal interval (SDNN) and the root mean square of successive differences (RMSSD) indexes, respectively.

SIGNIFICANCE

We confirmed and extended the hypothesis of sympathovagal imbalance in epilepsy, as showed by lower HF, SDNN, and RMSSD values when compared to controls. In addition, there was a trend for higher LF values in patients receiving pharmacotherapy. As lower vagal (HF) and higher sympathetic (LF) tone are predictors of morbidity and mortality in cardiovascular samples, our findings highlight the importance of investigating autonomic function in patients with epilepsy in clinical practice. Assessing HRV might also be useful when planning therapeutic interventions, as some antiepileptic drugs can show hazardous effects in cardiac excitability, potentially leading to cardiac arrhythmia.

摘要

目的

癫痫与致命性和致死性心律失常相关,癫痫猝死(SUDEP)部分与心脏事件相关。自主神经系统功能障碍会导致心律失常,尽管之前的研究已经调查了癫痫对心脏自主控制的影响,但关于癫痫患者中是否存在交感神经、迷走神经或两者失衡,以及抗癫痫药物治疗对自主神经系统的重要性,研究结果仍存在差异。因此,我们旨在通过分别表示为低频(LF)和高频(HF)功率谱的交感神经和副交感神经活动来评估心率变异性(HRV),以此研究癫痫及其治疗对 HRV 的影响。

方法

我们从可获得的最早日期到 2011 年 7 月在 Medline 和其他数据库中进行了系统综述;关键搜索词为“癫痫”;“抗癫痫药”;“心率变异性”;“迷走神经”;“自主神经系统”。我们纳入了报告至少一项 HRV 值数据和/或统计数据的原始研究,并由两位独立作者提取数据。我们使用随机效应模型,采用 Hedges 的 g 作为效应量的测量,进行了两项主要的荟萃分析,比较了(1)癫痫患者与对照组;(2)接受治疗与未接受治疗的患者;(3)控制良好与难治性患者的 LF 和 HF HRV 值。次要分析评估了其他时间和频率域测量(由于缺乏足够的数据集,未分析非线性方法)。对每个研究的质量进行了验证,并对荟萃分析技术进行了识别和控制偏倚的评估。进行了年龄和性别Meta 回归。

主要发现

最初,共确定了 366 条参考文献。根据我们的纳入标准,有 30 篇参考文献(39 项研究)纳入了我们的分析。关于 HF,癫痫患者的 HRV 值低于对照组(g=-0.69),95%置信区间(CI)范围为-1.05 至-0.33。LF 无显著差异(g=-0.18;95%CI-0.71 至 0.35)。接受治疗的患者与未接受治疗的患者的 HF 值相似(g=-0.05;95%CI-0.37 至 0.27),但 LF 值有升高的趋势(g=0.1;95%CI-0.13 至 0.33),在接受抗癫痫药物治疗的患者中更为明显(与迷走神经刺激相比)。控制良好与难治性患者之间无差异,这可能是由于研究数量较少。年龄和性别回归未影响结果。最后,次要的时间域分析也显示癫痫患者的 HRV 较低,迷走神经活性较低,分别表现为正常到正常间期的标准差(SDNN)和连续差值的均方根(RMSSD)指数。

意义

我们证实并扩展了癫痫中交感神经-迷走神经失衡的假说,与对照组相比,HF、SDNN 和 RMSSD 值较低。此外,接受药物治疗的患者 LF 值有升高的趋势。由于较低的迷走神经(HF)和较高的交感神经(LF)张力是心血管样本发病率和死亡率的预测因素,我们的研究结果强调了在临床实践中检查癫痫患者自主功能的重要性。评估 HRV 也可能有助于计划治疗干预,因为一些抗癫痫药物可能会对心脏兴奋性产生有害影响,从而导致心律失常。

相似文献

1
A systematic review and meta-analysis of heart rate variability in epilepsy and antiepileptic drugs.癫痫与抗癫痫药物治疗中心率变异性的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Epilepsia. 2012 Feb;53(2):272-82. doi: 10.1111/j.1528-1167.2011.03361.x. Epub 2012 Jan 5.
2
Systemic pharmacological treatments for chronic plaque psoriasis: a network meta-analysis.系统性药理学治疗慢性斑块状银屑病:网络荟萃分析。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Apr 19;4(4):CD011535. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011535.pub4.
3
Systemic pharmacological treatments for chronic plaque psoriasis: a network meta-analysis.慢性斑块状银屑病的全身药理学治疗:一项网状荟萃分析。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Dec 22;12(12):CD011535. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011535.pub2.
4
Rufinamide add-on therapy for refractory epilepsy.鲁非酰胺辅助治疗难治性癫痫。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Apr 25;4(4):CD011772. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011772.pub2.
5
Systemic pharmacological treatments for chronic plaque psoriasis: a network meta-analysis.慢性斑块状银屑病的全身药理学治疗:一项网状Meta分析。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Jan 9;1(1):CD011535. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011535.pub3.
6
Antiepileptic drug monotherapy for epilepsy: a network meta-analysis of individual participant data.抗癫痫药物单药治疗癫痫:一项个体参与者数据的网络荟萃分析。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Apr 1;4(4):CD011412. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011412.pub4.
7
Yoga for epilepsy.用于癫痫治疗的瑜伽
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Oct 5;10(10):CD001524. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001524.pub3.
8
Sertindole for schizophrenia.用于治疗精神分裂症的舍吲哚。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2005 Jul 20;2005(3):CD001715. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001715.pub2.
9
Antiepileptic drugs for chronic non-cancer pain in children and adolescents.用于儿童和青少年慢性非癌性疼痛的抗癫痫药物。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Aug 5;8(8):CD012536. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012536.pub2.
10
Systemic treatments for metastatic cutaneous melanoma.转移性皮肤黑色素瘤的全身治疗
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Feb 6;2(2):CD011123. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011123.pub2.

引用本文的文献

1
The Crucial Interplay Between the Lungs, Brain, and Heart to Understand Epilepsy-Linked SUDEP: A Literature Review.理解癫痫相关的不明原因猝死中肺、脑和心脏之间的关键相互作用:文献综述
Brain Sci. 2025 Jul 28;15(8):809. doi: 10.3390/brainsci15080809.
2
Research progress on the electrophysiological indicators to predict the efficacy of vagus nerve stimulation for drug-refractory epilepsy.预测迷走神经刺激治疗药物难治性癫痫疗效的电生理指标研究进展
Acta Epileptol. 2024 Mar 1;6(1):7. doi: 10.1186/s42494-023-00147-y.
3
The Association Between Antidepressant Treatment and Heart Rate Deceleration Capacity in Patients With Mood disorders-A Potential New Predictor of Sudden Cardiac Death.
情绪障碍患者抗抑郁治疗与心率减速能力之间的关联——心脏性猝死的一种潜在新预测指标
Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat. 2025 Mar 18;21:597-607. doi: 10.2147/NDT.S507851. eCollection 2025.
4
Death due to positional asphyxia related to underlying seizure disorder.与潜在癫痫发作障碍相关的体位性窒息导致的死亡。
Forensic Sci Med Pathol. 2025 Mar 7. doi: 10.1007/s12024-025-00973-1.
5
Management recommendations to reduce cardiac risk in chronic epilepsy.降低慢性癫痫患者心脏风险的管理建议。
Epilepsy Behav Rep. 2024 Dec 25;29:100738. doi: 10.1016/j.ebr.2024.100738. eCollection 2025 Mar.
6
The Gut Microbiota's Role in Neurological, Psychiatric, and Neurodevelopmental Disorders.肠道微生物群在神经、精神和神经发育障碍中的作用。
Nutrients. 2024 Dec 22;16(24):4404. doi: 10.3390/nu16244404.
7
The Epileptic Heart Syndrome: Epidemiology, pathophysiology and clinical detection.癫痫性心脏综合征:流行病学、病理生理学及临床检测
Epilepsy Behav Rep. 2024 Jul 20;27:100696. doi: 10.1016/j.ebr.2024.100696. eCollection 2024.
8
Update: factors influencing heart rate variability-a narrative review.更新:影响心率变异性的因素——一篇叙述性综述。
Front Physiol. 2024 Aug 6;15:1430458. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2024.1430458. eCollection 2024.
9
Heartbeat-evoked potentials following voluntary hyperventilation in epilepsy patients: respiratory influences on cardiac interoception.癫痫患者自主过度通气后的心跳诱发电位:呼吸对心脏内感受的影响。
Front Neurosci. 2024 Jul 5;18:1391437. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2024.1391437. eCollection 2024.
10
Cardiac arrhythmia and epilepsy genetic variants in sudden unexpected death in epilepsy.癫痫性猝死中的心律失常和癫痫相关基因变异
Front Neurol. 2024 May 2;15:1386730. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2024.1386730. eCollection 2024.