Aboelsayed Kamel M S, Abdel Razek Mahmoud Khamis, Assal Samir, Habib Ahmed M A, Negm Rana A
Assistant Lecturer, Department of Prosthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Alexandria University, Alexandria, Egypt.
Professor, Department of Prosthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Alexandria University, Alexandria, Egypt.
J Prosthet Dent. 2025 Oct;134(4):1327-1334. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2024.02.032. Epub 2024 Apr 1.
Infants with a cleft palate often experience middle ear disease, a condition of great significance, and early prosthetic management of these infants is essential. However, any correlation between prosthetic palatal obturation and middle ear function is unclear.
The purpose of this clinical trial was to assess whether prosthetic palatal obturation with a feeding appliance prevented or improved middle ear problems in infants with a cleft lip and palate.
Ten infants with congenital cleft lip and palate (20 ears) were referred to the Prosthodontics department immediately after birth. Assessment of the middle ear function by tympanometry as well as hearing quality by auditory brainstem response (ABR) was conducted before the prosthetic treatment (control readings). The middle ear function and hearing quality was followed up after the prosthetic treatment every month until surgical palatal closure (tenth month). The Friedman test was applied to compare data from the various study periods. When the results were significant, the Dunn post hoc test was conducted to compare the control first week readings with those of the later periods (α=.05 for all tests).
The preprosthetic readings of tympanometry in the first week were 90% Type A and 10% Type B for both right and left ears. Readings starting from the first to the fifth month revealed no statistically significant differences compared with the first week readings (P>.05). However, tympanometry readings starting from the sixth month (20% Type A and 80% Type B) until the tenth month (90% Type B and 10% Type C) for both ears represented a statistically significant difference compared with the first week readings (P≤.05). The preprosthetic readings of ABR in the first week showed that 90% of ears had normal hearing status and 10% had mild hearing loss. Readings starting from the first until the fifth month revealed no statistically significant differences compared with the first week readings (P>.05). However, ABR readings starting from the sixth month (20% normal hearing, 70% mild hearing loss, and 10% moderate hearing loss) until the tenth month (0% normal hearing, 80% mild hearing loss, and 20% moderate hearing loss) for both ears revealed a statistically significant difference compared with the first week readings (P≤.05).
Prosthetic palatal obturation with a feeding appliance plays a role in delaying rather than preventing the occurrence of otitis media with effusion in infants with a cleft lip and palate and could reduce the need for ventilation tubes.
腭裂婴儿常患中耳疾病,这一情况意义重大,对这些婴儿进行早期修复治疗至关重要。然而,修复性腭阻塞与中耳功能之间的任何关联尚不清楚。
本临床试验的目的是评估使用喂养器具进行修复性腭阻塞是否能预防或改善唇腭裂婴儿的中耳问题。
10名先天性唇腭裂婴儿(20只耳)在出生后立即被转诊至口腔修复科。在修复治疗前(对照读数),通过鼓室图评估中耳功能,并通过听性脑干反应(ABR)评估听力质量。在修复治疗后,每月对中耳功能和听力质量进行随访,直至腭裂修复手术(第十个月)。应用弗里德曼检验比较各个研究阶段的数据。当结果具有显著性时,进行邓恩事后检验,以比较第一周的对照读数与后续阶段的读数(所有检验的α = 0.05)。
第一周时,左右耳鼓室图的修复前读数中A型占90%,B型占10%。从第一个月到第五个月的读数与第一周读数相比,无统计学显著差异(P > 0.05)。然而,双耳从第六个月(A型占20%,B型占80%)到第十个月(B型占90%,C型占10%)的鼓室图读数与第一周读数相比,具有统计学显著差异(P≤0.05)。第一周时,ABR的修复前读数显示90%的耳听力状态正常,10%有轻度听力损失。从第一个月到第五个月的读数与第一周读数相比,无统计学显著差异(P > 0.05)。然而,双耳从第六个月(听力正常占20%,轻度听力损失占70%,中度听力损失占10%)到第十个月(听力正常占0%,轻度听力损失占80%,中度听力损失占20%)的ABR读数与第一周读数相比,具有统计学显著差异(P≤0.05)。
使用喂养器具进行修复性腭阻塞在延迟而非预防唇腭裂婴儿分泌性中耳炎的发生中起作用,并且可以减少鼓膜置管的需求。