Suppr超能文献

临床基因组检测中偶然发现的评估和报告框架。

A framework for the evaluation and reporting of incidental findings in clinical genomic testing.

机构信息

Medical Genomics Research, Illumina, Inc., San Diego, CA, 92122, USA.

Oncology, Natera Inc., Austin, TX, 78753, USA.

出版信息

Eur J Hum Genet. 2024 Jun;32(6):665-672. doi: 10.1038/s41431-024-01575-1. Epub 2024 Apr 2.

Abstract

Currently, there are no widely accepted recommendations in the genomics field guiding the return of incidental findings (IFs), defined here as unexpected results that are unrelated to the indication for testing. Consequently, reporting policies for IFs among laboratories offering genomic testing are variable and may lack transparency. Herein we describe a framework developed to guide the evaluation and return of IFs encountered in probands undergoing clinical genome sequencing (cGS). The framework prioritizes clinical significance and actionability of IFs and follows a stepwise approach with stopping points at which IFs may be recommended for return or not. Over 18 months, implementation of the framework in a clinical laboratory facilitated the return of actionable IFs in 37 of 720 (5.1%) individuals referred for cGS, which is reduced to 3.1% if glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase (G6PD) deficiency is excluded. This framework can serve as a model to standardize reporting of IFs identified during genomic testing.

摘要

目前,基因组学领域还没有被广泛接受的指导意见来指导偶然发现(IFs)的回报,这里定义为与测试指征无关的意外结果。因此,提供基因组检测的实验室之间的 IFs 报告政策各不相同,可能缺乏透明度。本文描述了一种框架,用于指导对临床基因组测序(cGS)中先证者中遇到的 IFs 的评估和回报。该框架优先考虑 IFs 的临床意义和可操作性,并采用逐步方法,在这些步骤中可以推荐或不推荐回报 IFs。在临床实验室实施该框架 18 个月后,在 720 名接受 cGS 检测的个体中,有 37 名(5.1%)被建议回报可采取行动的 IFs,如果排除葡萄糖-6-磷酸脱氢酶(G6PD)缺乏症,则减少到 3.1%。该框架可以作为标准化报告基因组检测中发现的 IFs 的模型。

相似文献

本文引用的文献

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验