Suppr超能文献

镇静与全身麻醉对接受经皮手术患者全因死亡率的影响:系统评价和荟萃分析。

Sedation versus general anesthesia on all-cause mortality in patients undergoing percutaneous procedures: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

机构信息

The First College for Clinical Medicine, Shanxi Medical University, No. 56 Xinjian South Road, Taiyuan, Shanxi, People's Republic of China.

College of Anesthesia, Shanxi Medical University, No. 56 Xinjian South Road, Taiyuan, Shanxi, People's Republic of China.

出版信息

BMC Anesthesiol. 2024 Apr 2;24(1):126. doi: 10.1186/s12871-024-02505-w.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The comparison between sedation and general anesthesia (GA) in terms of all-cause mortality remains a subject of ongoing debate. The primary objective of our study was to investigate the impact of GA and sedation on all-cause mortality in order to provide clarity on this controversial topic.

METHODS

A systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted, incorporating cohort studies and RCTs about postoperative all-cause mortality. Comprehensive searches were performed in the PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library databases, with the search period extending until February 28, 2023. Two independent reviewers extracted the relevant information, including the number of deaths, survivals, and risk effect values at various time points following surgery, and these data were subsequently pooled and analyzed using a random effects model.

RESULTS

A total of 58 studies were included in the analysis, with a majority focusing on endovascular surgery. The findings of our analysis indicated that, overall, and in most subgroup analyses, sedation exhibited superiority over GA in terms of in-hospital and 30-day mortality. However, no significant difference was observed in subgroup analyses specific to cerebrovascular surgery. About 90-day mortality, the majority of studies centered around cerebrovascular surgery. Although the overall pooled results showed a difference between sedation and GA, no distinction was observed between the pooled ORs and the subgroup analyses based on RCTs and matched cohort studies. For one-year all-cause mortality, all included studies focused on cardiac and macrovascular surgery. No difference was found between the HRs and the results derived from RCTs and matched cohort studies.

CONCLUSIONS

The results suggested a potential superiority of sedation over GA, particularly in the context of cardiac and macrovascular surgery, mitigating the risk of in-hospital and 30-day death. However, for the longer postoperative periods, this difference remains uncertain.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

PROSPERO CRD42023399151; registered 24 February 2023.

摘要

背景

镇静与全身麻醉(GA)在全因死亡率方面的比较仍是一个持续存在的争议话题。本研究的主要目的是探究 GA 和镇静对全因死亡率的影响,以澄清这一具有争议性的问题。

方法

系统检索 PubMed、EMBASE 和 Cochrane Library 数据库,检索时间截至 2023 年 2 月 28 日,纳入术后全因死亡率的队列研究和 RCT,由 2 位独立研究者提取相关信息,包括各时间点的死亡例数、生存例数和风险效应值,并采用随机效应模型进行合并分析。

结果

共纳入 58 项研究,其中多数研究聚焦于血管内手术。分析结果显示,总体上以及大多数亚组分析中,镇静在住院期间和 30 天死亡率方面优于 GA,但亚组分析中脑血管手术无差异。90 天死亡率的研究多聚焦于脑血管手术,虽然总体汇总结果显示镇静与 GA 之间存在差异,但汇总 OR 与基于 RCT 和匹配队列研究的亚组分析之间无差异。对于 1 年全因死亡率,所有纳入的研究均集中在心脏和大血管手术,HR 与 RCT 和匹配队列研究的结果无差异。

结论

结果提示镇静相对于 GA 具有潜在优势,尤其在心脏和大血管手术中,可降低住院和 30 天死亡风险,但在更长的术后时期,这种差异仍不确定。

试验注册

PROSPERO CRD42023399151;注册于 2023 年 2 月 24 日。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b517/10985877/fb5b30c0332a/12871_2024_2505_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验