文献检索文档翻译深度研究
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
邀请有礼套餐&价格历史记录

新学期,新优惠

限时优惠:9月1日-9月22日

30天高级会员仅需29元

1天体验卡首发特惠仅需5.99元

了解详情
不再提醒
插件&应用
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
高级版
套餐订阅购买积分包
AI 工具
文献检索文档翻译深度研究
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2025

颈椎间盘置换术后放射学骨改变的分类系统提案。

Proposal for a classification system of radiographic bone changes after cervical disc replacement.

机构信息

The Disc Replacement Center, Salt Lake City, UT, USA.

Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USA.

出版信息

J Orthop Surg Res. 2024 Apr 3;19(1):218. doi: 10.1186/s13018-024-04679-y.


DOI:10.1186/s13018-024-04679-y
PMID:38566203
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10988897/
Abstract

BACKGROUND: The goal of this study is to propose a classification system with a common nomenclature for radiographic observations of periprosthetic bone changes following cTDR. METHODS: Aided by serial plain radiographs from recent cTDR cases (34 patients; 44 devices), a panel of experts assembled for the purpose of creating a classification system to aid in reproducibly and accurately identifying bony changes and assessing cTDR radiographic appearance. Subdividing the superior and inferior vertebral bodies into 3 equal sections, observed bone loss such as endplate rounding, cystic erosion adjacent to the endplate, and cystic erosion not adjacent to the endplate, is recorded. Determining if bone loss is progressive, based on serial radiographs, and estimating severity of bone loss (measured by the percentage of end plate involved) is recorded. Additional relevant bony changes and device observations include radiolucent lines, heterotopic ossification, vertebral body olisthesis, loss of core implant height, and presence of device migration, and subsidence. RESULTS: Serial radiographs from 19 patients (25 devices) implanted with a variety of cTDR designs were assessed by 6 investigators including clinicians and scientists experienced in cTDR or appendicular skeleton joint replacement. The overall agreement of assessments ranged from 49.9% (95% bootstrap confidence interval 45.1-73.1%) to 94.7% (95% CI 86.9-100.0%). There was reasonable agreement on the presence or absence of bone loss or radiolucencies (range: 58.4% (95% CI 51.5-82.7%) to 94.7% (95% CI 86.9-100.0%), as well as in the progression of radiolucent lines (82.9% (95% CI 74.4-96.5%)). CONCLUSIONS: The novel classification system proposed demonstrated good concordance among experienced investigators in this field and represents a useful advancement for improving reporting in cTDR studies.

摘要

背景:本研究旨在为 cTDR 后假体周围骨变化的影像学观察提出一个具有通用命名法的分类系统。

方法:借助最近的 cTDR 病例(34 例患者;44 个设备)的连续平片,为创建一个分类系统而召集的一组专家旨在帮助可重复性和准确识别骨变化,并评估 cTDR 的影像学表现。将椎体的上、下部分成 3 个相等的部分,记录观察到的骨丢失,如终板变圆、终板附近的囊性侵蚀和不相邻的终板的囊性侵蚀。根据连续的 X 光片确定骨丢失是否进展,并记录骨丢失的严重程度(通过受累终板的百分比来衡量)。其他相关的骨变化和器械观察包括透亮线、异位骨化、椎体滑脱、核心植入物高度丢失和器械迁移和下沉。

结果:6 名调查员(包括在 cTDR 或四肢骨骼关节置换方面有经验的临床医生和科学家)评估了来自 19 名患者(25 个器械)的一系列 X 光片。评估的总体一致性范围为 49.9%(95% bootstrap 置信区间 45.1-73.1%)至 94.7%(95% CI 86.9-100.0%)。对于骨丢失或透亮线的存在与否(范围:58.4%(95% CI 51.5-82.7%)至 94.7%(95% CI 86.9-100.0%))以及透亮线的进展(82.9%(95% CI 74.4-96.5%)),存在合理的一致性。

结论:所提出的新分类系统在该领域经验丰富的调查员中表现出良好的一致性,代表了在 cTDR 研究中提高报告的有用进展。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7732/10988897/96f1041bc906/13018_2024_4679_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7732/10988897/4dbb6048178b/13018_2024_4679_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7732/10988897/7a6e82f35a44/13018_2024_4679_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7732/10988897/b832c9c961cc/13018_2024_4679_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7732/10988897/9417034d2b26/13018_2024_4679_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7732/10988897/96f1041bc906/13018_2024_4679_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7732/10988897/4dbb6048178b/13018_2024_4679_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7732/10988897/7a6e82f35a44/13018_2024_4679_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7732/10988897/b832c9c961cc/13018_2024_4679_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7732/10988897/9417034d2b26/13018_2024_4679_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7732/10988897/96f1041bc906/13018_2024_4679_Fig5_HTML.jpg

相似文献

[1]
Proposal for a classification system of radiographic bone changes after cervical disc replacement.

J Orthop Surg Res. 2024-4-3

[2]
Four-year results of a prospective single-arm study on 200 semi-constrained total cervical disc prostheses: clinical and radiographic outcome.

J Neurosurg Spine. 2016-11

[3]
Heterotopic ossification, osteolysis and implant failure following cervical total disc replacement with the M6-C™ artificial disc.

Eur Spine J. 2024-3

[4]
Clinical and radiological outcome at 10 years of follow-up after total cervical disc replacement.

Eur Spine J. 2017-9

[5]
Prospective, randomized, multicenter study of cervical arthroplasty: 269 patients from the Kineflex|C artificial disc investigational device exemption study with a minimum 2-year follow-up: clinical article.

J Neurosurg Spine. 2011-6-24

[6]
Clinical management of bone loss in cervical total disc arthroplasty: literature review and treatment recommendations.

Eur Spine J. 2024-8

[7]
Cervical arthroplasty versus anterior cervical fusion for symptomatic adjacent segment disease after anterior cervical fusion surgery: Review of treatment in 41 patients.

Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 2017-11

[8]
Seven-year cost-effectiveness of ProDisc-C total disc replacement: results from investigational device exemption and post-approval studies.

J Neurosurg Spine. 2016-5

[9]
Stabilization with the Dynamic Cervical Implant: a novel treatment approach following cervical discectomy and decompression.

J Neurosurg Spine. 2015-3

[10]
Cervical Total Disc Replacement: Food and Drug Administration-Approved Devices.

Neurosurg Clin N Am. 2021-10

本文引用的文献

[1]
Midterm osteolysis-induced aseptic failure of the M6-C™ cervical total disc replacement secondary to polyethylene wear debris.

Eur Spine J. 2022-5

[2]
The lexicon for periprosthetic bone loss versus osteolysis after cervical disc arthroplasty: a systematic review.

Eur Spine J. 2022-4

[3]
Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion Versus Cervical Disc Arthroplasty: A Comparison of National Trends and Outcomes.

World Neurosurg. 2022-4

[4]
Radiological Changes in Adjacent and Index Levels after Cervical Disc Arthroplasty.

Yonsei Med J. 2022-1

[5]
Aseptic and septic prosthetic joint loosening: Impact of biomaterial wear on immune cell function, inflammation, and infection.

Biomaterials. 2021-11

[6]
Cervical Total Disc Replacement: Complications and Complication Avoidance.

Neurosurg Clin N Am. 2021-10

[7]
Cervical Total Disc Replacement: Long-Term Outcomes.

Neurosurg Clin N Am. 2021-10

[8]
Cervical Total Disc Replacement: Novel Devices.

Neurosurg Clin N Am. 2021-10

[9]
Cervical Total Disc Replacement: Food and Drug Administration-Approved Devices.

Neurosurg Clin N Am. 2021-10

[10]
Failure in cervical total disc arthroplasty: single institution experience, systematic review of the literature, and proposal of the RUSH TDA failure classification system.

Spine J. 2022-3

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

推荐工具

医学文档翻译智能文献检索