The Disc Replacement Center, Salt Lake City, UT, USA.
Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USA.
J Orthop Surg Res. 2024 Apr 3;19(1):218. doi: 10.1186/s13018-024-04679-y.
BACKGROUND: The goal of this study is to propose a classification system with a common nomenclature for radiographic observations of periprosthetic bone changes following cTDR. METHODS: Aided by serial plain radiographs from recent cTDR cases (34 patients; 44 devices), a panel of experts assembled for the purpose of creating a classification system to aid in reproducibly and accurately identifying bony changes and assessing cTDR radiographic appearance. Subdividing the superior and inferior vertebral bodies into 3 equal sections, observed bone loss such as endplate rounding, cystic erosion adjacent to the endplate, and cystic erosion not adjacent to the endplate, is recorded. Determining if bone loss is progressive, based on serial radiographs, and estimating severity of bone loss (measured by the percentage of end plate involved) is recorded. Additional relevant bony changes and device observations include radiolucent lines, heterotopic ossification, vertebral body olisthesis, loss of core implant height, and presence of device migration, and subsidence. RESULTS: Serial radiographs from 19 patients (25 devices) implanted with a variety of cTDR designs were assessed by 6 investigators including clinicians and scientists experienced in cTDR or appendicular skeleton joint replacement. The overall agreement of assessments ranged from 49.9% (95% bootstrap confidence interval 45.1-73.1%) to 94.7% (95% CI 86.9-100.0%). There was reasonable agreement on the presence or absence of bone loss or radiolucencies (range: 58.4% (95% CI 51.5-82.7%) to 94.7% (95% CI 86.9-100.0%), as well as in the progression of radiolucent lines (82.9% (95% CI 74.4-96.5%)). CONCLUSIONS: The novel classification system proposed demonstrated good concordance among experienced investigators in this field and represents a useful advancement for improving reporting in cTDR studies.
背景:本研究旨在为 cTDR 后假体周围骨变化的影像学观察提出一个具有通用命名法的分类系统。
方法:借助最近的 cTDR 病例(34 例患者;44 个设备)的连续平片,为创建一个分类系统而召集的一组专家旨在帮助可重复性和准确识别骨变化,并评估 cTDR 的影像学表现。将椎体的上、下部分成 3 个相等的部分,记录观察到的骨丢失,如终板变圆、终板附近的囊性侵蚀和不相邻的终板的囊性侵蚀。根据连续的 X 光片确定骨丢失是否进展,并记录骨丢失的严重程度(通过受累终板的百分比来衡量)。其他相关的骨变化和器械观察包括透亮线、异位骨化、椎体滑脱、核心植入物高度丢失和器械迁移和下沉。
结果:6 名调查员(包括在 cTDR 或四肢骨骼关节置换方面有经验的临床医生和科学家)评估了来自 19 名患者(25 个器械)的一系列 X 光片。评估的总体一致性范围为 49.9%(95% bootstrap 置信区间 45.1-73.1%)至 94.7%(95% CI 86.9-100.0%)。对于骨丢失或透亮线的存在与否(范围:58.4%(95% CI 51.5-82.7%)至 94.7%(95% CI 86.9-100.0%))以及透亮线的进展(82.9%(95% CI 74.4-96.5%)),存在合理的一致性。
结论:所提出的新分类系统在该领域经验丰富的调查员中表现出良好的一致性,代表了在 cTDR 研究中提高报告的有用进展。
J Orthop Surg Res. 2024-4-3
Neurosurg Clin N Am. 2021-10
Neurosurg Clin N Am. 2021-10
Neurosurg Clin N Am. 2021-10
Neurosurg Clin N Am. 2021-10
Neurosurg Clin N Am. 2021-10