• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

颈椎间盘置换术后相邻节段和索引节段的影像学变化。

Radiological Changes in Adjacent and Index Levels after Cervical Disc Arthroplasty.

机构信息

Department of Neurosurgery, Yongin Severance Hospital, Yonsei University School of Medicine, Yongin, Korea.

Department of Neurosurgery, International St. Mary's Hospital, Catholic Kwandong University College of Medicine, Incheon, Korea.

出版信息

Yonsei Med J. 2022 Jan;63(1):72-81. doi: 10.3349/ymj.2022.63.1.72.

DOI:10.3349/ymj.2022.63.1.72
PMID:34913286
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8688375/
Abstract

PURPOSE

The purpose of this retrospective study was to evaluate radiological and clinical outcomes in patients undergoing cervical disc arthroplasty (CDA) for cervical degenerative disc disease. The results may assist in surgical decision-making and enable more effective and safer implementation of cervical arthroplasty.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A total of 125 patients who were treated with CDA between 2006 and 2019 were assessed. Radiological measurements and clinical outcomes included the visual analogue scale (VAS), the Neck Disability Index (NDI), and the Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) myelopathy score assessment preoperatively and at ≥2 years of follow-up.

RESULTS

The mean follow-up period was 38 months (range, 25-114 months). Radiographic data demonstrated mobility at both the index and adjacent levels, with no signs of hypermobility at an adjacent level. There was a non-significant loss of cervical global motion and range of motion (ROM) of the functional spinal unit at the operated level, as well as the upper and lower adjacent disc levels, compared to preoperative status. The cervical global and segmental angle significantly increased. Postoperative neck VAS, NDI, and JOA scores showed meaningful improvements after one- and two-level CDA. We experienced a 29.60% incidence of heterotrophic ossification and a 3.20% reoperation rate due to cervical instability, implant subsidence, or osteolysis.

CONCLUSION

CDA is an effective surgical technique for optimizing clinical outcomes and radiological results. In particular, the preservation of cervical ROM with an artificial prosthesis at adjacent and index levels and improvement in cervical global alignment could reduce revision rates due to adjacent segment degeneration.

摘要

目的

本回顾性研究旨在评估颈椎间盘置换术(CDA)治疗颈椎退行性疾病患者的影像学和临床结果。这些结果可能有助于手术决策,并使颈椎置换术的实施更加有效和安全。

材料和方法

评估了 2006 年至 2019 年间接受 CDA 治疗的 125 例患者。影像学测量和临床结果包括术前和至少 2 年随访时的视觉模拟评分(VAS)、颈部残疾指数(NDI)和日本矫形协会(JOA)脊髓病评分评估。

结果

平均随访时间为 38 个月(范围 25-114 个月)。影像学资料显示指数节段和相邻节段的活动度,相邻节段无过度活动迹象。与术前相比,手术节段和上下相邻椎间盘水平的颈椎整体活动度和运动范围(ROM)均有非显著丢失。颈椎整体和节段角度显著增加。术后颈部 VAS、NDI 和 JOA 评分在单节段和双节段 CDA 后均有显著改善。我们经历了 29.60%的异位骨化发生率和 3.20%的因颈椎不稳、植入物下沉或骨溶解而再次手术的发生率。

结论

CDA 是优化临床和影像学结果的有效手术技术。特别是在邻近和指数节段用人工假体保留颈椎 ROM 以及改善颈椎整体排列,可以降低因邻近节段退变而导致的翻修率。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3cca/8688375/abc375c9ce45/ymj-63-72-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3cca/8688375/fc686a7d952d/ymj-63-72-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3cca/8688375/1d449b0e9116/ymj-63-72-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3cca/8688375/abc375c9ce45/ymj-63-72-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3cca/8688375/fc686a7d952d/ymj-63-72-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3cca/8688375/1d449b0e9116/ymj-63-72-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3cca/8688375/abc375c9ce45/ymj-63-72-g003.jpg

相似文献

1
Radiological Changes in Adjacent and Index Levels after Cervical Disc Arthroplasty.颈椎间盘置换术后相邻节段和索引节段的影像学变化。
Yonsei Med J. 2022 Jan;63(1):72-81. doi: 10.3349/ymj.2022.63.1.72.
2
Is cervical disc arthroplasty good for congenital cervical stenosis?颈椎间盘置换术对先天性颈椎管狭窄症有益吗?
J Neurosurg Spine. 2017 May;26(5):577-585. doi: 10.3171/2016.10.SPINE16317. Epub 2017 Mar 10.
3
Clinical and radiographic outcomes of cervical disc arthroplasty with Prestige-LP Disc: a minimum 6-year follow-up study.Prestige-LP椎间盘颈椎间盘置换术的临床及影像学结果:一项至少6年的随访研究
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2018 Aug 7;19(1):285. doi: 10.1186/s12891-018-2201-9.
4
Cervical kinematics and radiological changes after Discover artificial disc replacement versus fusion.与融合术相比,Discover人工椎间盘置换术后的颈椎运动学及影像学变化。
Spine J. 2014 Jun 1;14(6):867-77. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2013.07.432. Epub 2013 Sep 26.
5
Cervical Disc Arthroplasty for the Treatment of Noncontiguous Cervical Degenerative Disc Disease: Results of Mid- to Long-Term Follow-up.颈椎间盘置换术治疗非连续型颈椎退行性椎间盘疾病:中期至长期随访结果。
Orthop Surg. 2023 Nov;15(11):2901-2910. doi: 10.1111/os.13900. Epub 2023 Sep 22.
6
Effects of smoking on cervical disc arthroplasty.吸烟对颈椎间盘置换术的影响。
J Neurosurg Spine. 2019 Feb 1;30(2):168-174. doi: 10.3171/2018.7.SPINE18634. Epub 2018 Nov 16.
7
[Effect of cervical disc arthroplasty and anterior cervical decompression and fusion on adjacent segment degeneration].颈椎间盘置换术与颈椎前路减压融合术对相邻节段退变的影响
Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2014 Sep;28(9):1100-5.
8
[Analysis of infuence factors of anterior bone loss after cervical disc arthroplasty and its effect on effectiveness].[颈椎间盘置换术后前路骨质丢失的影响因素分析及其对疗效的影响]
Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2021 Jan 15;35(1):26-32. doi: 10.7507/1002-1892.202008126.
9
Stabilization with the Dynamic Cervical Implant: a novel treatment approach following cervical discectomy and decompression.使用动态颈椎植入物进行稳定化:颈椎间盘切除及减压术后的一种新型治疗方法。
J Neurosurg Spine. 2015 Mar;22(3):237-45. doi: 10.3171/2014.10.SPINE131089. Epub 2015 Jan 2.
10
Effect of preoperative segmental range of motion on patient outcomes in cervical disc arthroplasty.术前节段活动度对颈椎间盘置换术患者预后的影响。
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2020 Jul 13;21(1):457. doi: 10.1186/s12891-020-03419-7.

引用本文的文献

1
Osteolysis after cervical disc arthroplasty with artificial cervical disc.人工颈椎间盘置换术后的骨质溶解
Eur Spine J. 2025 Jan;34(1):64-68. doi: 10.1007/s00586-024-08585-z. Epub 2024 Dec 3.
2
Influence of the deviated center of rotation on facet joint degeneration after cervical disc replacement - an in vivo study with a minimum of 10-year follow-up.颈椎间盘置换术后旋转中心偏位对小关节退变的影响:一项至少 10 年随访的前瞻性研究
BMC Surg. 2024 Nov 4;24(1):344. doi: 10.1186/s12893-024-02615-9.
3
Risk factors of bone loss after Prestige-LP cervical disc arthroplasty.

本文引用的文献

1
Revision Surgery for a Failed Artificial Disc.翻修失败的人工椎间盘手术
Yonsei Med J. 2021 Mar;62(3):240-248. doi: 10.3349/ymj.2021.62.3.240.
2
How Center of Rotation Changes and What Affects These After Cervical Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.颈椎置换术后旋转中心如何变化以及哪些因素会对其产生影响:一项系统评价与荟萃分析
World Neurosurg. 2020 Mar;135:e702-e709. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2019.12.111. Epub 2019 Dec 28.
3
Long-term Results Comparing Cervical Disc Arthroplasty to Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.
颈椎间盘假体置换术后骨丢失的风险因素。
Eur Spine J. 2024 Oct;33(10):3969-3977. doi: 10.1007/s00586-024-08400-9. Epub 2024 Jul 20.
4
Treatment of failed cervical total disc replacements in a series of 53 cases and description of a management strategy.53 例颈椎全椎间盘置换失败病例的治疗及治疗策略的描述。
Eur Spine J. 2024 Aug;33(8):3117-3123. doi: 10.1007/s00586-024-08402-7. Epub 2024 Jul 18.
5
Radiological and Clinical Significance of Cervical Dynamic Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy.颈椎动态磁共振成像对脊髓型颈椎病的影像学及临床意义
Neurospine. 2024 Jun;21(2):443-454. doi: 10.14245/ns.2448166.083. Epub 2024 Jun 30.
6
Restoration of Range of Motion in the Cervical Spine through Single-Segment Artificial Disc Replacement Using the BagueraC Prosthesis.使用BagueraC假体通过单节段人工椎间盘置换恢复颈椎活动范围
J Clin Med. 2024 Apr 2;13(7):2048. doi: 10.3390/jcm13072048.
7
Proposal for a classification system of radiographic bone changes after cervical disc replacement.颈椎间盘置换术后放射学骨改变的分类系统提案。
J Orthop Surg Res. 2024 Apr 3;19(1):218. doi: 10.1186/s13018-024-04679-y.
8
Emerging Technologies within Spine Surgery.脊柱外科领域的新兴技术
Life (Basel). 2023 Oct 9;13(10):2028. doi: 10.3390/life13102028.
比较颈椎间盘置换与前路颈椎间盘切除融合术的长期疗效:一项随机对照试验的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Orthop Surg. 2020 Feb;12(1):16-30. doi: 10.1111/os.12585. Epub 2019 Dec 21.
4
Comparison of Adjacent Segment Degeneration, Cervical Alignment, and Clinical Outcomes After One- and Multilevel Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion.单节段和多节段颈椎前路椎间盘切除融合术后相邻节段退变、颈椎排列及临床疗效的比较
Neurospine. 2019 Sep;16(3):589-600. doi: 10.14245/ns.1938166.083. Epub 2019 Sep 30.
5
Effect of Myelopathy on Early Clinical Improvement After Cervical Disc Replacement: A Study of a Local Patient Cohort and a Large National Cohort.脊髓病对颈椎间盘置换术后早期临床改善的影响:一项本地患者队列和一个大型全国队列的研究。
Neurospine. 2019 Sep;16(3):563-573. doi: 10.14245/ns.1938220.110. Epub 2019 Sep 30.
6
The Clinical Implications and Complications of Anterior Versus Posterior Surgery for Multilevel Cervical Ossification of the Posterior Longitudinal Ligament; An Updated Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.多节段后纵韧带骨化症前路与后路手术的临床意义及并发症:一项更新的系统评价和荟萃分析
Neurospine. 2019 Sep;16(3):530-541. doi: 10.14245/ns.1938326.163. Epub 2019 Sep 30.
7
Anterior Surgical Techniques for Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy: WFNS Spine Committee Recommendations.脊髓型颈椎病的前路手术技术:世界神经外科联合会脊柱委员会建议
Neurospine. 2019 Sep;16(3):408-420. doi: 10.14245/ns.1938250.125. Epub 2019 Sep 30.
8
The short-term efficacy and safety of artificial total disc replacement for selected patients with lumbar degenerative disc disease compared with anterior lumbar interbody fusion: A systematic review and meta-analysis.人工全椎间盘置换术与前路腰椎间融合术治疗特定腰椎退行性疾病患者的短期疗效和安全性的系统评价和荟萃分析。
PLoS One. 2018 Dec 28;13(12):e0209660. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0209660. eCollection 2018.
9
Cervical disc arthroplasty: tips and tricks.颈椎间盘置换术:技巧与窍门。
Int Orthop. 2019 Apr;43(4):777-783. doi: 10.1007/s00264-018-4259-2. Epub 2018 Dec 5.
10
Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Cervical Anterior Fusion and Cervical Artificial Disc Replacement in the Korean Medical System.韩国医疗体系中颈椎前路融合术与颈椎人工椎间盘置换术的成本效益分析
J Korean Neurosurg Soc. 2019 Jan;62(1):83-89. doi: 10.3340/jkns.2018.0076. Epub 2018 Nov 30.