Byvaltsev Vadim A, Kalinin Andrei A, Kuharev Alexander V, Azhibekov Nurzhan O, Aliyev Marat A
Department of Neurosurgery, Irkutsk State Medical University, Irkutsk, Russia.
Department of Neurosurgery, Railway Clinical Hospital, Irkutsk, Russia.
J Spine Surg. 2024 Mar 20;10(1):98-108. doi: 10.21037/jss-23-99. Epub 2024 Mar 15.
Currently, in the specialized literature there are no substantiated clinical and radiological indications for differentiated use of anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) and anterior cervical corpectomy and fusion (ACCF) in the treatment of patients with two-segmental cervical degenerative diseases. The objectives of this study were to (I) identify risk factors that were associated with unsatisfactory results of two-level ACDF and one-level ACCF in the treatment of patients with cervical degenerative diseases despite current perioperative management, and (II) develop a clinical and radiological algorithm for personalized surgical tactics.
We retrospectively identified risk factors for the development of unsatisfactory clinical postoperative results after two-level ACDF (n=81) and one-level ACCF (n=78), operated in the period of 2009-2019 for two-segmental cervical degenerative disease.
Satisfactory clinical results after two-level ACDF were noted in cases with total kyphotic deformity of less than 15°; local kyphotic deformity less than 10˚; the absence of circumferential spondylotic cervical stenosis; the absence of a myelopathic lesion at the level of the vertebral body; absence of migrating intervertebral disk (IVD) hernia more than 1/3 of the vertebral body; T1 slope vertebra less than 15°; IVD degeneration according to Suzuki A. 0-II; facet joint (FJ) degeneration according to Okamoto A. I-III; interbody height (IH) more than 2 mm. Satisfactory clinical results after single-level ACCF were registered in cases with IVD degeneration according to Suzuki A. III; FJ degeneration according to Okamoto A. IV-V; IH 3 mm or less; regardless of the cervical lordosis, the angle of local kyphotic deformity and T1 slope, the presence of circumferential spondylotic cervical stenosis, the localization of the myelopathic lesion and the distance of migration IVD herniation.
Individual planning and differentiated implementation of ACDF and ACCF in patients with two-segmental cervical degenerative disease, taking into account a comprehensive preoperative clinical and radiological assessment, contributes to the effective elimination of existing neurological symptoms, reducing the intensity of neck pain and upper limbs pain, restoring the functional state and quality of patients' lives in the minimum 24 months postoperative period, as well as reducing the number of postoperative complications and reoperations.
目前,专业文献中尚无确凿的临床和放射学指征来区分前路颈椎间盘切除融合术(ACDF)和前路颈椎椎体次全切除融合术(ACCF)在治疗两节段颈椎退行性疾病患者中的应用。本研究的目的是:(I)确定尽管有当前的围手术期管理,但在治疗颈椎退行性疾病患者时,与两节段ACDF和单节段ACCF效果不佳相关的危险因素;(II)制定个性化手术策略的临床和放射学算法。
我们回顾性地确定了2009年至2019年期间因两节段颈椎退行性疾病接受手术的81例两节段ACDF和78例单节段ACCF术后临床效果不佳的危险因素。
两节段ACDF术后临床效果满意的情况为:总后凸畸形小于15°;局部后凸畸形小于10°;无颈椎环形脊髓型狭窄;椎体水平无脊髓病变;无超过椎体1/3的迁移性椎间盘(IVD)疝;T1椎体倾斜度小于15°;根据铃木A法IVD退变0-II级;根据冈本A法小关节(FJ)退变I-III级;椎间高度(IH)大于2mm。单节段ACCF术后临床效果满意的情况为:根据铃木A法IVD退变III级;根据冈本A法FJ退变IV-V级;IH为3mm或更小;无论颈椎前凸、局部后凸畸形角度和T1椎体倾斜度如何,有无颈椎环形脊髓型狭窄、脊髓病变的定位以及IVD疝的迁移距离。
对于两节段颈椎退行性疾病患者,在综合术前临床和放射学评估的基础上,对ACDF和ACCF进行个体化规划和差异化实施,有助于有效消除现有的神经症状,减轻颈部疼痛和上肢疼痛的强度,在术后至少24个月恢复患者的功能状态和生活质量,同时减少术后并发症和再次手术的次数。