Hopper Adam L, Hudson Claire L, Klair Diksha, Ding Qiao, Gao Zhujun, Jha Aprajeeta, Bryan Austin, Tikekar Rohan V, Coolong Timothy, Dunn Laurel L, Micallef Shirley A
Department of Plant Science and Landscape Architecture, University of Maryland, College Park, MD, United States.
Department of Nutrition and Food Science, University of Maryland, College Park, MD, United States.
Front Plant Sci. 2024 Mar 19;15:1370495. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2024.1370495. eCollection 2024.
Wildlife feces can contaminate vegetables when enteric bacteria are released by rain and splashed onto crops. Regulations require growers to identify and not harvest produce that is likely contaminated, but U.S. federal standards do not define dimensions for no-harvest zones. Moreover, mulching, used to retain soil moisture and maximize crop yield may impact rain-mediated bacterial dispersal from feces.
To assess dissemination from a fecal point source to lettuce grown on various mulches, lettuce cv. 'Magenta' was transplanted into raised beds with plastic, biodegradable plastic, straw, or left uncovered at field sites in Maryland and Georgia. Eleven days post-transplant, 10 g of rabbit manure spiked with ~8 log CFU g were deposited in each bed. One day following natural or simulated rain events, lettuce was sampled along 1.5 m transects on either side of fecal deposits. Lettuce-associated was semi-quantified with an MPN assay and dependence on fecal age (stale or fresh), lettuce age (baby leaf or mature head), distance from point source, mulch and post-rain days were statistically evaluated.
Distance (<0.001), fecal age (<0.001) and mulch (<0.01) were factors for transfer from point source to lettuce. The highest and lowest estimates were measured from lettuce grown on biodegradable plastic and straw, respectively, with a 2-log MPN difference (<0.001). Mulch and distance were also significant factors in recovery 3 days post-rain (both <0.001), where plastic mulches differed from bare ground and straw (<0.01). For all treatments, fewer were retrieved from lettuce at 0.3 m, 3 days post-rain compared to 1 day (0.001). Fitting the data to a Weibull Model predicated that a 7-log reduction in from fecal levels would be achieved at 1.2-1.4 m from the point source on plastic mulches, 0.75 m on bare soil (<0.05) and 0.43 m on straw (0.01).
Straw and bare ground limited rain-mediated dispersal from feces to lettuce compared to plastic mulches. Fecal age was negatively associated with dispersal. These findings can inform harvesting recommendations for measures related to animal intrusion in vegetable production areas.
当肠道细菌被雨水冲刷并溅到农作物上时,野生动物粪便会污染蔬菜。相关规定要求种植者识别并不得收获可能受到污染的农产品,但美国联邦标准并未对禁止收获区域的范围做出界定。此外,用于保持土壤湿度和使作物产量最大化的地膜覆盖可能会影响雨水介导的粪便细菌传播。
为了评估从粪便点源到种植在各种地膜上的生菜的细菌传播情况,将生菜品种“洋红色”移植到马里兰州和佐治亚州田间的高畦中,畦面覆盖有塑料膜、可生物降解塑料膜、稻草,或不覆盖地膜。移栽11天后,在每个畦中放置10克添加了约8 log CFU/g的兔粪。在自然降雨或模拟降雨事件后的一天,沿着粪便沉积点两侧1.5米的样带对生菜进行采样。通过MPN法对与生菜相关的细菌进行半定量,并对粪便年龄(陈旧或新鲜)、生菜年龄(幼叶或成熟叶球)、距点源的距离、地膜类型和雨后天数的相关性进行统计学评估。
距离(<0.001)、粪便年龄(<0.001)和地膜类型(<0.01)是影响细菌从点源传播到生菜的因素。分别从种植在可生物降解塑料膜和稻草上的生菜中测得的细菌估计值最高和最低,两者相差2个对数MPN(<0.001)。地膜类型和距离也是雨后3天细菌回收率的显著影响因素(均<0.001),其中塑料地膜与裸地和稻草地膜之间存在差异(<0.01)。对于所有处理,雨后3天在距离粪便沉积点0.3米处采集的生菜中回收的细菌数量少于雨后1天(0.001)。将数据拟合到威布尔模型预测,在塑料地膜上距点源1.2 - 1.4米处、裸土上0.75米处(<0.05)和稻草地膜上0.43米处(0.01),粪便中的细菌数量将减少7个对数。
与塑料地膜相比,稻草和裸地限制了雨水介导的粪便细菌向生菜的传播。粪便年龄与细菌传播呈负相关。这些发现可为蔬菜生产区动物入侵相关措施的收获建议提供参考。