Suppr超能文献

再分配对我们的健康有益吗?检验过去 40 年来欧盟各国福利慷慨程度与健康之间的宏观关联。

Is Redistribution Good for Our Health? Examining the Macrocorrelation between Welfare Generosity and Health across EU Nations over the Last 40 Years.

机构信息

University of Connecticut.

University at Albany, State University of New York.

出版信息

J Health Polit Policy Law. 2024 Oct 1;49(5):855-884. doi: 10.1215/03616878-11257040.

Abstract

CONTEXT

Social determinants of health are finally getting much-needed policy attention, but their political origins remain underexplored. In this article, the authors advance a theory of political determinants as accruing along three pathways of welfare state effects (redistribution, poverty reduction, and status preservation), and they test these assumptions by examining impacts of policy generosity on life expectancy (LE) over the last 40 years.

METHODS

The authors merge new and existing welfare policy generosity data from the Comparative Welfare Entitlement Project with data on LE spanning 1980-2018 across 21 countries in the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development. They then examine relationships between five welfare policy generosity measures and LE using cross-sectional differencing and autoregressive lag models.

FINDINGS

The authors find consistent and positive effects for total generosity (an existing measure of social insurance generosity) on LE at birth across different model specifications in the magnitude of an increase in LE at birth of 0.10-0.15 years (p < 0.05) as well as for a measure of status preservation (0.11, p < 0.05). They find less consistent support for redistribution and poverty reduction measures.

CONCLUSIONS

The authors conclude that in addition to generalized effects of policy generosity on health, status-preserving social insurance may be an important, and relatively overlooked, mechanism in increasing LE over time in advanced democracies.

摘要

背景

健康的社会决定因素终于引起了人们的关注,但是它们的政治起源仍未得到充分探索。本文作者提出了一种政治决定因素理论,认为这些因素可以通过三种福利国家效应的途径(再分配、减贫和维护地位)产生,并通过检验政策宽松度对过去 40 年来预期寿命的影响来验证这些假设。

方法

作者将来自比较福利权益项目的新的和现有的福利政策宽松度数据与经济合作与发展组织 21 个国家 1980 年至 2018 年的预期寿命数据相结合。然后,他们使用横截面差异和自回归滞后模型检验了五种福利政策宽松度措施与预期寿命之间的关系。

发现

作者发现,在不同模型中,总宽松度(一种现有的社会保险宽松度衡量标准)对出生时预期寿命的影响是一致且积极的,出生时预期寿命的增加幅度在 0.10 至 0.15 岁之间(p<0.05),并且对于维护地位的措施(0.11,p<0.05)也是如此。他们发现,对再分配和减贫措施的支持不太一致。

结论

作者的结论是,除了政策宽松度对健康的普遍影响外,维护地位的社会保险可能是一个重要的、相对被忽视的机制,可以随着时间的推移增加先进民主国家的预期寿命。

相似文献

10
Public action and the quality of life in developing countries.发展中国家的公共行动与生活质量
Oxf Bull Econ Stat. 1981 Nov;43(4):287-319. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-0084.1981.mp43004001.x.

本文引用的文献

1
Explaining happiness trends in Europe.解释欧洲的幸福趋势。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2022 Sep 13;119(37):e2210639119. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2210639119. Epub 2022 Sep 6.
2
Welfare state decommodification and population health.福利国家去商品化与人口健康。
PLoS One. 2022 Aug 31;17(8):e0272698. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0272698. eCollection 2022.
6
Who dies early? Education, mortality and causes of death in Norway.谁英年早逝?挪威的教育、死亡率和死因。
Soc Sci Med. 2020 Jan;245:112601. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2019.112601. Epub 2019 Oct 19.
7
The politics hypothesis and racial disparities in infants' health in the United States.美国婴儿健康方面的政治假说与种族差异
SSM Popul Health. 2019 Jul 6;8:100440. doi: 10.1016/j.ssmph.2019.100440. eCollection 2019 Aug.
8
The effect of unemployment benefits on health: A propensity score analysis.失业救济金对健康的影响:倾向评分分析。
Soc Sci Med. 2019 Apr;226:198-206. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2019.02.047. Epub 2019 Mar 1.
10
Economic insecurity: A socioeconomic determinant of mental health.经济不安全感:心理健康的社会经济决定因素。
SSM Popul Health. 2018 Sep 15;6:184-194. doi: 10.1016/j.ssmph.2018.09.006. eCollection 2018 Dec.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验