• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

再分配对我们的健康有益吗?检验过去 40 年来欧盟各国福利慷慨程度与健康之间的宏观关联。

Is Redistribution Good for Our Health? Examining the Macrocorrelation between Welfare Generosity and Health across EU Nations over the Last 40 Years.

机构信息

University of Connecticut.

University at Albany, State University of New York.

出版信息

J Health Polit Policy Law. 2024 Oct 1;49(5):855-884. doi: 10.1215/03616878-11257040.

DOI:10.1215/03616878-11257040
PMID:38567772
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11822727/
Abstract

CONTEXT

Social determinants of health are finally getting much-needed policy attention, but their political origins remain underexplored. In this article, the authors advance a theory of political determinants as accruing along three pathways of welfare state effects (redistribution, poverty reduction, and status preservation), and they test these assumptions by examining impacts of policy generosity on life expectancy (LE) over the last 40 years.

METHODS

The authors merge new and existing welfare policy generosity data from the Comparative Welfare Entitlement Project with data on LE spanning 1980-2018 across 21 countries in the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development. They then examine relationships between five welfare policy generosity measures and LE using cross-sectional differencing and autoregressive lag models.

FINDINGS

The authors find consistent and positive effects for total generosity (an existing measure of social insurance generosity) on LE at birth across different model specifications in the magnitude of an increase in LE at birth of 0.10-0.15 years (p < 0.05) as well as for a measure of status preservation (0.11, p < 0.05). They find less consistent support for redistribution and poverty reduction measures.

CONCLUSIONS

The authors conclude that in addition to generalized effects of policy generosity on health, status-preserving social insurance may be an important, and relatively overlooked, mechanism in increasing LE over time in advanced democracies.

摘要

背景

健康的社会决定因素终于引起了人们的关注,但是它们的政治起源仍未得到充分探索。本文作者提出了一种政治决定因素理论,认为这些因素可以通过三种福利国家效应的途径(再分配、减贫和维护地位)产生,并通过检验政策宽松度对过去 40 年来预期寿命的影响来验证这些假设。

方法

作者将来自比较福利权益项目的新的和现有的福利政策宽松度数据与经济合作与发展组织 21 个国家 1980 年至 2018 年的预期寿命数据相结合。然后,他们使用横截面差异和自回归滞后模型检验了五种福利政策宽松度措施与预期寿命之间的关系。

发现

作者发现,在不同模型中,总宽松度(一种现有的社会保险宽松度衡量标准)对出生时预期寿命的影响是一致且积极的,出生时预期寿命的增加幅度在 0.10 至 0.15 岁之间(p<0.05),并且对于维护地位的措施(0.11,p<0.05)也是如此。他们发现,对再分配和减贫措施的支持不太一致。

结论

作者的结论是,除了政策宽松度对健康的普遍影响外,维护地位的社会保险可能是一个重要的、相对被忽视的机制,可以随着时间的推移增加先进民主国家的预期寿命。

相似文献

1
Is Redistribution Good for Our Health? Examining the Macrocorrelation between Welfare Generosity and Health across EU Nations over the Last 40 Years.再分配对我们的健康有益吗?检验过去 40 年来欧盟各国福利慷慨程度与健康之间的宏观关联。
J Health Polit Policy Law. 2024 Oct 1;49(5):855-884. doi: 10.1215/03616878-11257040.
2
Shorter lives in stingier states: Social policy shortcomings help explain the US mortality disadvantage.吝啬州居民寿命较短:社会政策缺陷有助于解释美国的死亡率劣势。
Soc Sci Med. 2016 Dec;171:30-38. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2016.10.017. Epub 2016 Oct 18.
3
Welfare States, Labor Markets, Political Dynamics, and Population Health: A Time-Series Cross-Sectional Analysis Among East and Southeast Asian Nations.福利国家、劳动力市场、政治动态与人口健康:东亚和东南亚国家的时间序列横截面分析
Asia Pac J Public Health. 2016 Apr;28(3):219-31. doi: 10.1177/1010539516628171. Epub 2016 Feb 3.
4
The role of welfare state principles and generosity in social policy programmes for public health: an international comparative study.福利国家原则与慷慨程度在公共卫生社会政策项目中的作用:一项国际比较研究。
Lancet. 2008 Nov 8;372(9650):1633-40. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(08)61686-4.
5
Welfare generosity and population health among Canadian provinces: a time-series cross-sectional analysis, 1989-2009.加拿大各省的福利慷慨程度与人口健康状况:一项1989 - 2009年的时间序列横断面分析
J Epidemiol Community Health. 2015 Oct;69(10):970-7. doi: 10.1136/jech-2014-205385. Epub 2015 May 7.
6
Measures that increase social equality are effective in improving life satisfaction in times of economic crisis.在经济危机时期,增加社会平等的措施能有效提高生活满意度。
BMC Public Health. 2018 Nov 6;18(1):1233. doi: 10.1186/s12889-018-6076-3.
7
More than just nickels and dimes: a cross-national analysis of working poverty in affluent democracies.不只是几分钱的问题:富裕民主国家工作贫困的跨国分析。
Soc Probl. 2010;57(4):559-85. doi: 10.1525/sp.2010.57.4.559.
8
Priorities for action on the social determinants of health: Empirical evidence on the strongest associations with life expectancy in 54 low-income countries, 1990-2012.健康社会决定因素的行动重点:1990 - 2012年54个低收入国家与预期寿命最强关联的实证证据
Soc Sci Med. 2016 Oct;167:88-98. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2016.08.035. Epub 2016 Aug 22.
9
Protocol: realist synthesis of the impact of unemployment insurance policies on poverty and health.方案:对失业保险政策对贫困和健康影响的现实主义综合分析
Eval Program Plann. 2015 Feb;48:1-9. doi: 10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2014.09.002. Epub 2014 Sep 19.
10
Public action and the quality of life in developing countries.发展中国家的公共行动与生活质量
Oxf Bull Econ Stat. 1981 Nov;43(4):287-319. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-0084.1981.mp43004001.x.

本文引用的文献

1
Explaining happiness trends in Europe.解释欧洲的幸福趋势。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2022 Sep 13;119(37):e2210639119. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2210639119. Epub 2022 Sep 6.
2
Welfare state decommodification and population health.福利国家去商品化与人口健康。
PLoS One. 2022 Aug 31;17(8):e0272698. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0272698. eCollection 2022.
3
COVID-19 Cuts Life Expectancy in Dozens of Countries.新冠疫情缩短了数十个国家的人均预期寿命。
JAMA. 2022 Jan 18;327(3):209. doi: 10.1001/jama.2021.24595.
4
Health Power Resources Theory: A Relational Approach to the Study of Health Inequalities.健康权力资源理论:一种研究健康不平等的关系方法。
J Health Soc Behav. 2021 Dec;62(4):493-511. doi: 10.1177/00221465211025963.
5
The effect of welfare reform on the health of the unemployed: evidence from a natural experiment in Germany.福利改革对失业者健康的影响:来自德国自然实验的证据。
J Epidemiol Community Health. 2020 Mar;74(3):211-218. doi: 10.1136/jech-2019-213151. Epub 2020 Jan 8.
6
Who dies early? Education, mortality and causes of death in Norway.谁英年早逝?挪威的教育、死亡率和死因。
Soc Sci Med. 2020 Jan;245:112601. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2019.112601. Epub 2019 Oct 19.
7
The politics hypothesis and racial disparities in infants' health in the United States.美国婴儿健康方面的政治假说与种族差异
SSM Popul Health. 2019 Jul 6;8:100440. doi: 10.1016/j.ssmph.2019.100440. eCollection 2019 Aug.
8
The effect of unemployment benefits on health: A propensity score analysis.失业救济金对健康的影响:倾向评分分析。
Soc Sci Med. 2019 Apr;226:198-206. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2019.02.047. Epub 2019 Mar 1.
9
The impact of social assistance programs on population health: a systematic review of research in high-income countries.社会援助计划对人口健康的影响:高收入国家研究的系统评价。
BMC Public Health. 2019 Jan 3;19(1):2. doi: 10.1186/s12889-018-6337-1.
10
Economic insecurity: A socioeconomic determinant of mental health.经济不安全感:心理健康的社会经济决定因素。
SSM Popul Health. 2018 Sep 15;6:184-194. doi: 10.1016/j.ssmph.2018.09.006. eCollection 2018 Dec.