• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

解释欧洲的幸福趋势。

Explaining happiness trends in Europe.

机构信息

Department of Economics, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90007.

National Academy of Sciences, Irvine, CA 92617.

出版信息

Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2022 Sep 13;119(37):e2210639119. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2210639119. Epub 2022 Sep 6.

DOI:10.1073/pnas.2210639119
PMID:36067317
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9477395/
Abstract

In Europe, differences among countries in the overall change in happiness since the early 1980s have been due chiefly to the generosity of welfare state programs-increasing happiness going with increasing generosity and declining happiness with declining generosity. This is the principal conclusion from a time-series study of 10 Northern, Western, and Southern European countries with the requisite data. In the present study, cross-section analysis of recent data gives a misleading impression that economic growth, social capital, and/or quality of the environment are driving happiness trends, but in the long-term, time-series data, these variables have no relation to happiness.

摘要

在欧洲,自 20 世纪 80 年代初以来,各国幸福感总体变化的差异主要归因于福利国家计划的慷慨程度——慷慨程度增加与幸福感增加相关,慷慨程度下降与幸福感下降相关。这是对具有必要数据的 10 个北欧、西欧和南欧国家进行时间序列研究的主要结论。在本研究中,对近期数据的横截面分析产生了一种误导性印象,即经济增长、社会资本和/或环境质量正在推动幸福感趋势,但从长期来看,时间序列数据表明这些变量与幸福感无关。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4bea/9477395/61d0803e6040/pnas.2210639119fig01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4bea/9477395/61d0803e6040/pnas.2210639119fig01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4bea/9477395/61d0803e6040/pnas.2210639119fig01.jpg

相似文献

1
Explaining happiness trends in Europe.解释欧洲的幸福趋势。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2022 Sep 13;119(37):e2210639119. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2210639119. Epub 2022 Sep 6.
2
Immigrant-Native Disparities in Happiness among Middle-Aged and Older Adults in Western European Countries: The Moderating Role of Social Capital.移民与本地居民在幸福感上的差异:中老年群体在西欧国家的比较研究——社会资本的调节作用。
J Aging Health. 2021 Jun-Jul;33(5-6):427-441. doi: 10.1177/0898264321990282. Epub 2021 Feb 8.
3
Measures that increase social equality are effective in improving life satisfaction in times of economic crisis.在经济危机时期,增加社会平等的措施能有效提高生活满意度。
BMC Public Health. 2018 Nov 6;18(1):1233. doi: 10.1186/s12889-018-6076-3.
4
Values and economic performance across European welfare state regimes: Direct and indirect effects through social capital, human capital and managerial skills.欧洲福利国家模式下的价值观和经济绩效:通过社会资本、人力资本和管理技能的直接和间接影响。
PLoS One. 2024 Feb 23;19(2):e0298667. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0298667. eCollection 2024.
5
The role of welfare state principles and generosity in social policy programmes for public health: an international comparative study.福利国家原则与慷慨程度在公共卫生社会政策项目中的作用:一项国际比较研究。
Lancet. 2008 Nov 8;372(9650):1633-40. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(08)61686-4.
6
Relationship between social capital and happiness in a Japanese community: A cross-sectional study.日本社区中社会资本与幸福感的关系:一项横断面研究。
Nurs Health Sci. 2019 Jun;21(2):245-252. doi: 10.1111/nhs.12589. Epub 2018 Dec 28.
7
Social and psychological correlates of happiness in 17 European countries.17个欧洲国家幸福度的社会与心理关联因素
Ir J Psychol Med. 2010 Sep;27(3):130-134. doi: 10.1017/S0790966700001294.
8
Right-wing populism and self-rated health in Europe: a multilevel analysis.右翼民粹主义与欧洲自评健康:一项多层次分析。
J Epidemiol Community Health. 2019 Dec;73(12):1116-1121. doi: 10.1136/jech-2018-211995. Epub 2019 Sep 25.
9
Shorter lives in stingier states: Social policy shortcomings help explain the US mortality disadvantage.吝啬州居民寿命较短:社会政策缺陷有助于解释美国的死亡率劣势。
Soc Sci Med. 2016 Dec;171:30-38. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2016.10.017. Epub 2016 Oct 18.
10
Exploring and explaining the "Santa Claus effect": cross-sectional study of jollity in 21 European countries.探索并解释“圣诞老人效应”:21 个欧洲国家欢乐程度的横断面研究。
J Ment Health. 2017 Dec;26(6):538-542. doi: 10.1080/09638237.2017.1370643. Epub 2017 Sep 4.

引用本文的文献

1
Is Redistribution Good for Our Health? Examining the Macrocorrelation between Welfare Generosity and Health across EU Nations over the Last 40 Years.再分配对我们的健康有益吗?检验过去 40 年来欧盟各国福利慷慨程度与健康之间的宏观关联。
J Health Polit Policy Law. 2024 Oct 1;49(5):855-884. doi: 10.1215/03616878-11257040.

本文引用的文献

1
Income, health, and well-being around the world: evidence from the Gallup World Poll.世界各地的收入、健康与幸福:盖洛普世界民意调查的证据
J Econ Perspect. 2008 Spring;22(2):53-72. doi: 10.1257/jep.22.2.53.
2
The social context of well-being.幸福的社会背景。
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2004 Sep 29;359(1449):1435-46. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2004.1522.