Brooklyn College, Brooklyn, NY, USA11210.
Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, NY, USA11794.
Politics Life Sci. 2024;43(1):99-131. doi: 10.1017/pls.2023.15. Epub 2023 Oct 12.
Recent research suggests that contemporary American society is marked by heightened hostile racial rhetoric, alongside increasing salience of White nationalists who justify an ideology of racial hierarchy with claims of biological superiority. Media coverage of such genetics research has often emphasized a deterministic (or causal) narrative by suggesting that specific genes directly increase negative outcomes and highlighting reported genetic differences between racial groups. Across two experimental studies, we examine the effect of the media's portrayal of scientific findings linking genes with negative health and behavioral outcomes on measures of racism. We find that deterministic genetic attributions for health and behavioral outcomes can lead to more negative racial out-group attitudes. Importantly, we also investigate potential interventions in the presentation of genetic science research. Our research has implications for understanding racial attitudes and racialized ideology in contemporary American politics, as well as for framing scientific communication in intergroup contexts.
最近的研究表明,当代美国社会的特点是激烈的敌对种族言论,以及越来越多的白人至上主义者,他们以声称生物优越性来为种族等级制度的意识形态辩护。媒体对这类遗传学研究的报道常常强调一种决定论(或因果关系)的说法,暗示特定的基因直接增加负面结果,并强调报告的种族群体之间的遗传差异。在两项实验研究中,我们考察了媒体对将基因与负面健康和行为结果联系起来的科学发现的描述对种族主义衡量标准的影响。我们发现,对健康和行为结果的决定论基因归因可能导致对其他种族群体的更负面态度。重要的是,我们还研究了在呈现遗传科学研究时的潜在干预措施。我们的研究对于理解当代美国政治中的种族态度和种族化意识形态,以及在群体间背景下构建科学传播具有重要意义。